American Third Position

Media Deception Continues over "Americans" Killed in Mexican Drug Wars

Posted: 02 Nov 2010 05:20 PM PDT

"U.S., Mexico Probe Americans' Border City Deaths" was the Associated Press (AP) and CBS's headline — but the truth was that all four of those killed had distinctly Mexican names.

The latest bout of mass murder to take place in the city of Ciudad Juarez, now known as the "world's deadliest city" after a drug gang war there between the Sinaloa and Juarez cartels, has raised the count of those killed to more than 2,000 people this year.

The casual reader of news websites might well have presumed that the latest four deaths were some silly white American tourists who just happened to wander over the border after ignoring all warnings about the city.

The media went out of its way to try and hide the fact that the dead were either all Mexican immigrants, or descendants of Mexican immigrants.

This is a deliberate ploy by the media to try and convince the white public that once Mexicans cross the border and acquire a U.S. passport, they somehow stop behaving like Mexicans.

Instead (or so they would have us believe), as though they'd been sprinkled with holy water, these Mexicans suddenly lose all the traits which have turned Mexico into the failed state that it is, and become industrious Americans, just like the rest of us who built this great nation up from nothing.

The details released by the Chihuahua state prosecutor's office on the recent killings make it clear, however, just what went on.

Spokesman Arturo Sandoval said that two of the victims, Giovanna Herrera, 26, and Luis Araiza, 15, had criminal records.

They were shot Saturday along with a Mexican man traveling with them just after they crossed an international bridge from El Paso, Sandoval was quoted as saying.

The third victim was named as Edgar Lopez, 35, "of El Paso, Texas." He was killed Sunday along with two other Mexican men when gunmen opened fire on a group standing outside a house.

The fourth victim was a 24-year-old woman and another "El Paso resident" named Lorena Izaguirre, killed Friday inside a tortilla shop. Another Mexican man was also found dead in the store.

The media deception continued: "The attacks represented the deadliest weekend for Americans in Mexico since Feb. 1, when four U.S. citizens were killed in different parts of the country. The largest previous single-city death toll for Americans was in June 2009, when three U.S. citizens were murdered in Tijuana," the AP report continued.

In fact, State Department figures show a steady rise in the number of "Americans" killed in Mexico, with the tally for the first six months of 2010 reaching 49.

Almost all of these murders took place in border cities such as Ciudad Juarez, Tijuana and Mexicali, which have "also been the hardest hit by drug violence," the AP report added as if this was some type of coincidence.

"In some of the killings, the Americans apparently were in the company of Mexican friends, relatives, or acquaintances who were the targets," the AP report let slip.

All crime reports from the border show that the overwhelming majority of drug-related criminal activity is carried out by Mexicans, or nationals of that country who have managed to establish themselves in America.

The American Third Position demands the immediate expulsion of all aliens, legal or otherwise, who are involved in any sort of criminal enterprise.

We are convinced that once this is done, the number of "Americans" being killed in Mexico's drug wars will decline rapidly.

Did Obama Call Whites the "Enemy?"

Posted: 02 Nov 2010 04:40 PM PDT

Did President Obama really mean whites when he called his opponents the "enemy?" Or was he "just" referring to Republicans?

Observers all across the political spectrum have asked this question as America went to the polls under a cloud of racial insults and overt black mobilization by Obama.

A week ago, Obama was speaking in an interview with Univision radio in which he sought to persuade Hispanics to vote for Democratic candidates instead of Republicans.

"If Latinos sit out the election instead of, 'we're going to punish our enemies and we're going to reward our friends who stand with us on issues that are important to us' — if they don't see that kind of upsurge in voting in this election, then I think it's going to be harder," Obama said.

While Republicans played down the racial aspect of the comment and tried to make out he was talking only about Republicans (which in itself is bad enough, considering other Americans to be the "enemy") the reality is that Obama was talking in explicitly racial terms.

After all, he was talking directly to Hispanics and not the general public, about issues which directly affect Latinos, and the "upsurge in voting is also a clear reference to the large nonwhite turnout in his favour which took place in 2008.

This is not the first time that Obama has spoken directly to nonwhites to encourage them to vote as a racial block. In April this year, a video broadcast put onto his official site specifically called on "African-Americans and Latinos" to come out and vote in the current elections in order to secure "our" victories.

Now, who was the "our" to which he was referring? Was it that of white Americans? Or was it the blacks and Latinos he was specifically addressing?

When Obama last addressed the Congressional Black Caucus, he continued with his overtly racial mobilization request.

"I need everybody here to go back to your neighborhoods, to go back to your workplaces, to go to the churches, and go to the barbershops, and go to the beauty shops. And tell them we've got more work to do," Obama said.

The "barbershops" reference was a clear indication that he meant black, as that formed an important part of his 2008 campaign.

Defenders of Obama say that he was talking about Republicans. It is however strange that he never actually mentioned them, referring to only to "the other side." Which "side" would that have been, bearing in mind that he was talking to a blacks-only organization?

Or, conversely, what would the media's reaction have been if a white president had addressed a "white congressional caucus" and told them to get as many whites out to vote to "stop the enemy" from winning.

It is obvious that extreme double standards are at work today and that there is one law for white Americans, and another law for everyone else.