RePortersNoteBook.com: Re: Helen Thomas: In Appreciation : ICH

Hello,

I'm quite intrigued about the "Helen Thomas Affair." I once caught her bolstering the 19-Arabs-with-Box-Cutters 9/11 scenario, admittedly in a passing way, but such ways are often how a story is made to establish itself as fact, so I wondered: Could a person dedicated to being a news correspondent, never mind the White House adjective, in the United States fail to notice that the planes have never been forensically identified, or that well over a thousand architects and engineers dispute the official story about how the Towers and WTC 7 came down, and all the rest of it?

Either answer must mean that such a person was either:

a) Useless as an observer of what was going on around her, or

b) Was content not to mention these glaringly obvious discrepancies in the official story.

After all, many good men, women and children have died because no one who mattered stood up and cried: "This is wrong!", either just after 9/11 or during the massive weapons-of-mass-destruction swindle that was carried out in plain sight, from within the Oval Office and Downing Street, and which was then brought into the United Nation's Security Council as absolute fact.

Shouldn't Helen Thomas to be castigated for her silence on those issues, as well as many others, while praising her for her question to Obama about Israel's nuclear weapons and her forthrightness about the Palestine issue?

Anthony

On 18 June 2010 01:15, Michael <RePorterNoteBook@gmail.com> wrote:

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article25733.htm

Peace.
Michael Santomauro
Editorial Director
@ 917-974-6367

What sort of Truth is it that crushes the freedom to seek the truth?

Let's End Thought Crimes in the Twenty-first Century. -- to separate historical fact from propaganda…peace is patriotic!