Michael Santomauro says:
October 21, 2010 at 3:08 AM
Hi Folks,
Remember the New York Magazine cover story: “The Jewish Brain: Are Jew’s smarter?”
(LINK on my name for the article. Otherwise the letter I wrote to Ms. Senior, who wrote the article, won’t make sense. )
Oct. 19, 2005
Re: Are Jews Smarter?
Dear Ms. Senior:
Why is it okay for white Jews (Ashkenazim) to sub-divide themselves from the Sephardic lower IQ? (Forty-five percent of Israel’s population has the Sephardic IQ of 88.)
And it is not okay for other White ethnics to be able to do the same when reporting IQ scores? For example, at the very minimum, it would show Northern and Western Europeans to be comparable if not slightly higher than the Jewish-white IQ, when you eliminate the Eastern European IQ. In some categories the European-White IQ is way higher, such as in spatial reasoning, even for all White ethnics including the Eastern European. This is rarely reported in the mass media. I wonder why? It reminds me of a joke from the Jewish comedian David Steinberg, who is married to an Italian-Catholic: “Whenever I go to family gatherings, the Jewish side breaks things, and the Italian side fixes them!”
In folk psychology and folk sociology, when it comes to E. Q., even my Jewish supremacist acquaintances and friends will think they have been culturally short changed, thinking of themselves as an unhappy lot.
In aesthetics Jews “seem” to have an inferiority complex when it comes to physical aptitude, which I have argued with my Jewish friends, is absolutely uncalled for! For instance, in “folk talk,” my Jewish girlfriends believe what is often said (even by Bobby Fischer) about Jewish men in the “below the belt” department, that they have been short changed from all that inbreeding.
And what about Jewish women? Again, referring to David Steinberg’s promulgation of the joke: “What moves more Jell-O or Jewish women in bed”. The rate of Jewish men running away to marry “shiksa’s” for the under 35 age category is as high as 35-50%, depending on which data you want to embrace.
Are we to make a correlation from any of this?
The point being, it is hard to define what is a “Jewish brain” in the secular world. You mention the high percentage of Jewish Nobel Prize winners since its inception in 1901, yet about two-thirds of the Jewish winners come from inter-faith/inter-ethnic backgrounds. For centuries before 1901, the portion of Jewish contributions to the high sciences is almost void.
To refer to chess master Bobby Fischer (another one of those 1/2 Jews), is slanderous to Jews. Your readers should be aware that he hates Jews with a fervent passion, and blames virtually any bad that is happening in the world on organized Jewry.
You wrote: “Of course, there’s another side to this shining coin. Jewish cleverness has also been an enduring feature of anti-Semitic paranoia.”
The implication here for your readers misunderstanding is that anti-Semitism is the result of Jewish intellect. Historically it has been as a result of resource competition, belief in a moral and intellectual superiority and a fierce policy of non assimilation with the host countries which initially offered you admittance with friendliness. Anti-Semitism is not in any way a mental illness.
Western Civilization is a European-white accomplishment and Judaism has always been an appendage. Not the other way around.
We are a better world today because Western Civilization took the road to Athens over the road to Jerusalem.
If we had a proper scientific study involving IQ tests that are not skewed to fit one group in particular (by, for example, including musical intelligence tests that are currently excluded because some people “don’t believe in” musical intelligence) then all this Jewish intellectual narcissism would disappear up its own arsehole. Which is precisely why we will never see such a thing, for it would be truly “anti-Semitic”.
As long as we’re playing with racism and stereotypes, where do Jews rank in the greed and power scale? Or the bad landlord scale? Or the cause of social inequality, war and exploitation of lesser people scale?
One last thing, it’s too much of a reach to think that Charlemagne “lured” Jews there to lend money. Give me a break!
Peace.
Michael Santomauro
ReporterNotebook@gmail.com
Helvena says:
October 21, 2010 at 3:35 AM
Thank you Michael. I bet your letter didn’t make it into the New York magazine. Please provide us with the links or names of the research that demonstrates the information you give up above such as Sephardic IQ and Northern/Western European IQ. Thank you.
eurodele says:
October 21, 2010 at 8:45 AM
Yes, Michael – great link, and great commentary!
You make a good and often-ignored point. In visual/spatial/mechanical reasoning, the average Jew is rather a dunce. It’s in Talmudic legalistic wordsplitting and “shekel algebra” that Jews tend to excel.
This is why, when we look at Jewish culture over time, we see a backward bunch of usurious quibblers; when we look at Western European and American culture over time, we see a long series of quasi-divine discoveries and inventions that (for the most part) have bettered the quality of human life.
It’s a very good point that Jewish Nobels have been contemporaneous with Jewish outbreeding to Western Europeans; add this to the fact that Jews are “self-selecting” when it comes to prizes, honoraria, and material rewards, and it’s no mystery whose genes are still mainly responsible for most Nobel-caliber achievement.
One minor point of disagreement, however. First you say
“my Jewish girlfriends believe what is often said (even by Bobby Fischer) about Jewish men in the “below the belt” department, that they have been short changed from all that inbreeding.”
Then you say
“Western Civilization is a European-white accomplishment and Judaism has always been an appendage. Not the other way around.”
In fact, if White appendages were Judaic in nature, they’d be much smaller than they actually are. :) :) wink-wink
Michael Santomauro says:
October 21, 2010 at 11:03 AM
Hi Helvena and Eurodele,
LINK by clicking on my name.
From Wikipedia
Dr. Richard Lynn:
IQ and the Wealth of Nations
Peace.
Michael Santomauro
ReporterNotebook@gmail.com
Call anytime: 917-974-6367
The above exchange here.
What sort of TRUTH is it that crushes the freedom to seek the truth?
eurodele says:
October 21, 2010 at 11:52 AM
It’s important to note, regarding national tables like the one on this page, that “nation” no longer implies common genetic ancestry:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IQ_and_the_Wealth_of_Nations
When one looks at the figures for an Asian nation, for example, one usually sees the average IQ of a nearly genetically homogeneous population. But when one looks at the figures for Western European nations, one sees the effects of cumulative genetic contamination deliberately forced on the native populations of those nations by Jewish multiculturalists as they worked to make their host societies safe for their trademark brand of social parasitism, e.g., by pushing for insane levels of non-White immigration and welfare-funded population explosions of low-IQ “minorities”.
For this reason, it should not be inferred on the basis of such tables that Jews enjoy ANYWHERE NEAR the average IQ advantage they claim, even in verbal and numerical IQ alone, over Whites of pure Western European ancestry. They are much closer to the global mean than they pretend…if anything, inferior to Whites of pure Western European ancestry in factors supporting the development, maintenance, and expansion of technological civilization.
Many of us are getting quite sick of this “Jewish intellectual superiority” canard. The history of Western civilization tells a very different story. As usual, we can chalk most of this nonsense up to Jewish infestation of the media and education systems.
"In 1908," notes the Jerusalem Post, "Jews were 25 percent of the four million residents in New York City but 50% of the prison population." [HENRY, M., 10-4-01] That same year, the police commissioner of New York City, Theodore A. Bingham, publicly noted that half of all the criminals in his city were Jewish. "Jewish leaders," notes Robert Rockaway, "worried that Jewish gangsters provided ammunition for Jew-haters. Consequently, they steadfastly refused to acknowledge the problem in public." [ROCKAWAY, R., 1993, p. 51] As stories of Jewish crime in New York City became increasingly publicized in the mainstream mass media, initially the "Yiddish press challenged the veracity of the evidence," [GOREN, p. 141] but "beginning in 1909 and reaching a climax in 1912," says Arthur Goren, "widely publicized disclosures of vice and crime among Jews created dismay and then alarm in Jewish circles. Protests of innocence were now impossible." [GOREN, p. 135]
ReplyDeleteLINK for above:
http://www.jewishtribalreview.org/09crime.htm
PS: Today: Jewish-Americans are 2%, yet they are 9% of the Federal Prison population amongst White ethnies.
Jewish History, Jewish Religion:
ReplyDeleteThe Weight of Three Thousand Years
By Professor Israel Shahak
Random excerpts:
A chief deceiver in this case, and a good example of the power of the deception, was Martin Buber. His numerous works eulogizing the whole Hassidic movement (including Habbad) never so much as hint at the real doctrines of Hassidism concerning non-Jews. The crime of deception is all the greater in view of the fact that Buber’s eulogies of Hassidism were first published in German during the period of the rise of German nationalism and the accession of Nazism to power. But while ostensibly opposing Nazism, Buber glorified a movement holding and actually teaching doctrines about non-Jews not unlike the Nazi doctrines about Jews. One could of course argue that the Hassidic Jews of seventy or fifty years ago were the victims, and a ‘white lie’ favoring a victim is excusable. But the consequences of deception are incalculable. Buber’s works were translated into Hebrew, were made a powerful element of the Hebrew education in Israel, have greatly increased the power of the blood-thirsty Hassidic leaders, and have thus been an important factor in the rise of Israeli chauvinism and hate of all non-Jews. If we think about the many human beings who died of their wounds because Israeli army nurses, incited by Hassidic propaganda, refused to tend them, then a heavy onus for their blood lies on the head of Martin Buber.
The second dominant feature of the dispensations is that they are in large part obviously motivated by the spirit of profit. And it is this combination of hypocrisy and the profit motive which increasingly dominated classical Judaism. In Israel, where the process goes on, this is dimly perceived by popular opinion, despite all the official brainwashing promoted by the education system and the media. The religious establishment – the rabbis and the religious parties – and, by association, to some extent the Orthodox community as a whole, are quite unpopular in Israel. One of the most important reasons for this is precisely their reputation for duplicity and venality. Of course, popular opinion (which may often be prejudiced) is not the same thing as social analysis; but in this particular case it is actually true that the Jewish religious establishment does have a strong tendency to chicanery and graft, due to the corrupting influence of the Orthodox Jewish religion. Because in general social life religion is only one of the social influences, its effect on the mass of believers is not nearly so great as on the rabbis and leaders of the religious parties. Those religious Jews in Israel who are honest, as the majority of them undoubtedly are, are so not because of the influence of their religion and rabbis, but in spite of it. On the other hand, in those few areas of public life in Israel which are wholly dominated by religious circles, the level of chicanery, venality and corruption is notorious, far surpassing the ‘average’ level tolerated by general, non-religious Israeli society.
LINK:
http://radioislam.org/historia/shahak/english.htm
Peace.
Michael Santomauro
ReporterNotebook@gmail.com
917-974-6367
Jewish History, Jewish Religion:
ReplyDeleteThe Weight of Three Thousand Years
By Professor Israel Shahak
Random excerpt:
It is important to note that all the supposedly ‘Jewish characteristics’ – by which I mean the traits which vulgar so-called intellectuals in the West attribute to ‘the Jews’ – are modern characteristics, quite unknown during most of Jewish history, and appeared only when the totalitarian Jewish community began to lose its power. Take, for example, the famous Jewish sense of humor. Not only is humor very rare in Hebrew literature before the 19th century (and is only found during few periods, in countries where the Jewish upper class was relatively free from the rabbinical yoke, such as Italy between the 14th and 17th centuries or Muslim Spain) but humor and jokes are strictly forbidden by the Jewish religion – except, significantly, jokes against other religions. Satire against rabbis and leaders of the community was never internalized by Judaism, not even to a small extent, as it was in Latin Christianity. There were no Jewish comedies, just as there were no comedies in Sparta, and for a similar reason.8 Or take the love of learning. Except for a purely religious learning, which was itself in a debased and degenerate state, the Jews of Europe (and to a somewhat lesser extent also of the Arab countries) were dominated, before about 1780, by a supreme contempt and hate for all learning (excluding the Talmud and Jewish mysticism). Large parts of the Old Testament, all nonliturgical Hebrew poetry, most books on Jewish philosophy were not read and their very names were often anathematized. Study of all languages was strictly forbidden, as was the study of mathematics and science. Geography,9 history – even Jewish history – were completely unknown. The critical sense, which is supposedly so characteristic of Jews, was totally absent, and nothing was so forbidden, feared and therefore persecuted as the most modest innovation or the most innocent criticism.
LINK:
http://radioislam.org/historia/shahak/english.htm
Peace.
Michael Santomauro
ReporterNotebook@gmail.com
917-974-6367