Memo: From a new book I will publish this summer. The professor who wrote the book will use his REAL name. -- Michael Santomauro Random excerpt: When Congress unanimously established the Holocaust Council, it made no mention of the fact that the revisionist threat was one of the main reasons for the creation of both the "Museum" and the "Days of Remembrance." Once the legislation had been enacted and signed by President Carter, the mask came off. In the Council's meeting in New York on December 10, 1980, Wiesel made it clear that he perceived Holocaust revisionism to be a grave threat both to himself and to the Jewish Holocaust narrative as a whole. He told the members of the Council that "the denial of the Holocaust is a very serious problem. As some of you may know, I was probably the first to alert the American Jewish community to that danger. In the beginning there were only a few articles and two or three books, and nobody listened. Then I said: 'You know, there are already ten books.' Somewhat later I said: 'There are already twenty-four books.' Year after year, the number has increased. The problem has finally caught up with us. I must say that I feel impure when I touch these books. I don't know what to do. Debate them? I would not dignify them with a debate. I would not dignify them with a dialogue." Wiesel then asked in his still wobbly English: "What should be done with them. To ignore them? I do not know how. We cannot. The best thing to do is what we are doing: to write more books, to speak more about the Holocaust in more authentic voice." In other words, since 1980, unable to answer the revisionists, Wiesel, the museum authorities and the Zionist media have simply turned up the volume on their one-sided and propagandistic presentation of the Holocaust. 1980: Another Blow to "the Holocaust:" Serge Klarsfeld Publishes the Auschwitz Album As the U. S. Holocaust Memorial Museum was coming into being, Serge Klarsfeld, who was still a rather obscure French lawyer and Jewish Holocaustian activist, published the so-calledAuschwitz Album, which is also known as the Lili Jacob Album, after the name of the Jewish deportee who discovered it. It is also important to remember that she did not find it at Auschwitz-Birkenau, but at the Dora-Mittelbau camp in south central Germany. The fact that Jacob had suppressed the album from 1945 until 1980, when she donated it to the Yad Vashem Museum in Israel, speaks volumes about what the pictures really show: that there was no Holocaust at Auschwitz-Birkenau. But with the rise of revisionism in the 1970s, Klarsfeld apparently thought that by publishing the pictures, often misleadingly captioned, he could use it as a weapon against the revisionists. Lili Jacob had suppressed these pictures for over three decades because they exposed to ridicule the utter mendacity of the Jewish "survivors." In fact, anyone who looks at them with a critical eye today cannot help but conclude that they do indeed document the fact that there was no Holocaust at the Birkenau camp. But by the time Klarsfeld and the Holocaustians took over the pictures in 1980, the Orwellian world in which we live - a world in which up is down, black is white and peace is war - had evolved to such an extent that these pictures could be published with highly deceptive captions with the certainty that no official historian or other recognized expert would dare to publicly question the outrageous lies contained in them. +++
Chapter IX: 1980s: Wiesel Becomes America's Holocaust High Priest
No comments:
Post a Comment