Translate

Dec 3, 2009

Demjanjuk--An Evil Campaign to Frame an Innocent Man

 

Review

July 1995

An Evil Campaign to Frame an Innocent Man

  • The Demjanjuk Affair: The Rise and Fall of a Show-Trial, by Yoram Sheftel. London: Victor Gollancz, 1994. 379 pages.
Reviewed by Lesya Jones

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v15/v15n6p45_Jones.html

On July 29, 1993, John Demjanjuk was acquitted by the Israeli Supreme Court of the charge of being the sadistic Treblinka guard "Ivan the Terrible." This book, written by his Israeli attorney, deals with the pivotal Israeli chapter of his 16 year ordeal.

The title says it all, in a nutshell. It is a scathing and uncompromising account of the "trial of the century." Its author, a fervent Zionist and Israeli patriot, spares none of the many players in the Demjanjuk affair, not even the "Ukrainian goyim" who paid for his fees. It is a highly personal account in which the defense counsel, and not the accused, is the star attraction in a courtroom drama that riveted a worldwide audience.

An experienced criminal lawyer and expert in identification cases, with a penchant for adventure (he successfully defended the notorious gangster Meyer Lansky), Sheftel decided to join the defense team after being shown the highly suggestive and biased photo spread used to identify John Demjanjuk as "Ivan the Terrible." On a more personal level, he was motivated to take on the case because he was convinced that "the one and only purpose of this move was to conduct a special 'Israel-style' show trial, to teach Israeli children the story of the Holocaust and heighten Holocaust awareness among the public."

An International Conspiracy

The fast-paced and ebullient style contrasts chillingly with the grim and sinister content. Sheftel amasses incontrovertible evidence which proves that the Demjanjuk affair was not simply a case of mistaken identity but, rather, a deliberate and cold-blooded conspiracy by superpowers United States and former Soviet Union, as well as Germany, Israel and Poland to withhold exculpatory evidence in their possession and send to the gallows an innocent no man's man. These countries did this in pursuit of their respective agendas.

In the United States, the Office of Special Investigation (OSI) at the Department of Justice, which was established to investigate alleged Nazi war criminals residing in the US, was particularly zealous in its efforts to destroy Demjanjuk. Having just lost a series of decisions, the OSI was, in fact, fighting for its life. Congressman Joshua Eilberg, Chairman of the House of Representatives' Subcommittee on Immigration, wrote in August, 1978, to US Attorney General Griffin Bell re the Demjanjuk case: "We cannot afford to risk losing another decision." This anxiety was shared by Alan Ryan Jr., who headed the OSI from its establishment until 1981. In an interview with a local Alabama newspaper in 1991, Ryan reminisced: "If we had lost that case, we probably would have had a very short life span." In other words, "the OSI conspired to shorten Demjanjuk's life in order to lengthen its own."

Evidence Discarded and Manufactured

In fact, the OSI knew as early as August 1978 from Moscow cables sent to the State Department in Washington as well as to the American Embassy in Tel Aviv that John Demjanjuk was not "Ivan the Terrible," and not only did it withhold that evidence from the defense, but dumped some of it, including original documents, into its trash bins. Furthermore, the garbage contents revealed that the OSI did not just conceal exonerating evidence, but manufactured false affidavits in collusion with the Israeli prosecution.

In reading this book, one gets the impression that, far from being intimidated, the author relished being "Satan's lawyer" and "the most hated man in Israel." Courage, not modesty, is Sheftel's cardinal virtue. But then, Demjanjuk's attorney has nothing to be modest about. After all, he took on single-handedly his country's justice system and formidable mass media and won unprecedented decisions on both counts, debunking firmly entrenched myths that Israel possesses a model justice system and an independent, unbiased press.

Neither death threats, unrelenting harassment by the judges, daily vilification in the media, suspicious suicide of a prominent colleague on the eve of the appeal, an acid attack by an alleged Holocaust survivor, which nearly left him blind; not even the wrath of his beloved mother could stay this intrepid attorney from the case. And in the darkest hour, when all seemed lost -- there being no time to prepare the appeal -- fortune and history intervened. A timely heart attack of one of the judges granted a crucial respite and the collapse of the Soviet Union made it possible to access KGB archives which established conclusively Demjanjuk's innocence and forced the Israeli Supreme Court's hand.

Sheftel delights in getting back at his opponents and detractors, especially his nemesis, the presiding Supreme Court Justice Dov Levin. The chapter entitled "Dovele" is written as "sweet revenge" for the many humiliations, trials and tribulations Sheftel endured, and may be of particular interest to the legal community in North America. It will shock those who choose to read it, for the instances of judicial misconduct are legion.

For example, immediately after affixing his signature to the verdict, Judge Levin set off on a lecture tour of the United States, undeterred by the fact that the Demjanjuk case was still sub judice. Ohio's Plain Dealer cited one of his many legal gems, namely: "We cannot be impressed by someone claiming 'I am innocent.' Innocence must be proven." Sheftel is angered and embittered by "the cowardice and hypocrisy of the thousands of the Israeli legal community." The only one who dared to speak out publicly was the highly respected, retired Judge Haim Cohen. In an interview with the newspaper Al Hasharon, Judge Cohen stated: "It was a spectacular for the people. Any resemblance to justice was purely coincidental."

'Death to Ukrainians'

The reader will be revolted, along with Lord Denning, revisiting the reading of the sentence after which a jubilant mob danced and shouted: "Death, death," "Death to Ivan," "Death to the defense attorney," "Death to all Ukrainians ..." It may be recalled that Lord Denning condemned the grotesque spectacle in Jerusalem as "contrary to international law" and showing "signs of racial and political vengeance." (The Daily Telegraph [London], April 28, 1988).

The book has flaws. There is no index and there are misspellings of names, as well as some factual errors. For instance, the author confuses The Ukrainian Weekly with a Ukrainian communist newspaper. Sheftel's explosive book has suffered an even worse fate than that by expert witness for the defense, Willem A. Wagenaar, Identifying Ivan: A Case Study in Legal Psychology (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1989). With the exception of Chrystia Freeland's review in The Financial Times (London), December 10-11, 1994, Sheftel's work continues to be ignored, except in Israel where it became an immediate best-seller. Demjanjuk's miraculous acquittal appears to have put a damper on the projected multimillion "Ivan the Terrible"/Demjanjuk entertainment industry. The only ones benefitting are those who conspired to send an innocent man to a horrific death by hanging.

Lessons

In spite of the fact that the Sixth Circuit Court in Cincinnati, Ohio, found "fraud upon the court," the OSI is still in business, and the chief architects of the Demjanjuk affair not only remain unpunished, but have found lucrative employment elsewhere. While in Israel, Judges Zvi Tal and Dalia Dorner were elevated to the Supreme Court.

The book is highly recommended, especially to our legal Ukrainian community. There was quality input by Ukrainian attorneys into Demjanjuk's defense. Paul Chumak of Toronto did a first-rate job as one of a team of Demjanjuk's lawyers and the late Jaroslaw Dobrowolskyj of Detroit played a crucial role in uncovering evidence which cleared John Demjanjuk. Others labored behind the scenes. This reviewer is, therefore, saddened by the fact that our legal community continues to pretend that the Demjanjuk affair involved one individual Ukrainian, and refuses even to acknowledge the existence of a collective indictment against Ukrainians. Let me cite from pages 4 and 7 (English translation) of the Indictment by the State of Israel versus Ivan (John) Demjanjuk, Criminal Case 373/86:

The auxiliaries played an essential role in the annihilation of the Jews; without them, the commanders of Operation Reinhardt could not have carried out their plan... These auxiliaries, in the main Ukrainians, worked with SS personnel in carrying out all the acts of annihilation, murder and oppression committed against the Jewish victims in the camps.

May this indictment, which still stands, serve as a challenge to our legal community to right a historical wrong.


Lesya Jones is the former Secretary of the Canadian Charitable Committee in Defence of John Demjanjuk. This review first appeared in The Ukrainian Voice (Winnipeg), July 31, 1995.


--
NOW AN AMAZON KINDLE BOOK ON YOUR PC, iPHONE OR KINDLE DEVICE:

Debating the Holocaust: A New Look At Both Sides by Thomas Dalton

http://www.amazon.com/DEBATING-HOLOCAUST-Thomas-Dalton-ebook/dp/B002SN9HEW/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1259095221&sr=1-2


Peace.

Michael Santomauro
Editorial Director
Call anytime: 917-974-6367
ReporterNotebook@Gmail.com

__._,_.___
.

__,_._,___

Gilad Atzmon: Accessory vs. Perpetrator

 


Accessory vs. Perpetrator by Gilad Atzmon

DateThursday, December 3, 2009 

German State Prosecutors Hans-Joachim Lutz announced yesterday that Mr John Demjanjuk, 89, is accused of being an 'accessory' of the death of 27,900 Jews.

Many of us may not understand what the legal notion of 'accessory' stands for. An 'accessory' is a person who assists in the commission of a crime, but who does not actually participate in the commission of the crime as a joint principal.

Bearing that in mind. I wonder what Demjanjuk's court case is there to serve?
 
To read more:


--
NOW AN AMAZON KINDLE BOOK ON YOUR PC, iPHONE OR KINDLE DEVICE:

Debating the Holocaust: A New Look At Both Sides by Thomas Dalton

http://www.amazon.com/DEBATING-HOLOCAUST-Thomas-Dalton-ebook/dp/B002SN9HEW/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1259095221&sr=1-2


Peace.

Michael Santomauro
Editorial Director
Call anytime: 917-974-6367
ReporterNotebook@Gmail.com

__._,_.___
.

__,_._,___

John Demjanjuk Video Clip: Accessory vs. Perpetrator

 

Accessory vs. Perpetrator
THURSDAY, 03 DECEMBER 2009 13:29 GILAD ATZMON

TRANSLATE 

In1986 John Demjanjuk was extradited to Israel where he was put on trial. According to the Israeli prosecutors, Demjanjuk was brought to a German POW camp in Chelmno in July 1942. He then volunteered to collaborate with the Germans and was sent to the camp at Trawniki, where he was trained to guard prisoners and was given a firearm, a uniform, and an ID card with his photograph. The principal allegation was that Demjanjuk was in fact "Ivan the Terrible" the notorious cold blooded murderer of Treblinka. On April 18, 1988, the Israeli court found Demjanjuk guilty of all charges. One week later it sentenced him to death by hanging.

In 1993, five Israeli Supreme Court judges overturned the guilty verdict on appeal. They realised that the case against Demjanjuk was based on 'mistaken identification'. "We restrained ourselves" the Israeli judges wrote, "from convicting the appellant of the horrors of Treblinka. Ivan Demjanjuk has been acquitted by us, because of doubt, of the terrible charges attributed to Ivan the Terrible of Treblinka"

MORE and Video Clip:






--
NOW AN AMAZON KINDLE BOOK ON YOUR PC, iPHONE OR KINDLE DEVICE:

Debating the Holocaust: A New Look At Both Sides by Thomas Dalton

http://www.amazon.com/DEBATING-HOLOCAUST-Thomas-Dalton-ebook/dp/B002SN9HEW/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1259095221&sr=1-2


Read books on your computer:

Get Kindle for PC
Mac version coming soon

http://www.amazon.com/gp/feature.html/ref=kcp_pc_mkt_lnd?docId=1000426311

Peace.

Michael Santomauro
Editorial Director
Call anytime: 917-974-6367
ReporterNotebook@Gmail.com




__._,_.___
.

__,_._,___

Climategate is the symptom, not the disease by Jim Dean

 

Jim Dean
Jim Dean, Heritage TV producer/host

Jim Dean is the producer of Heritage TV and a member of Georgia Heritage Council.


Climategate is the symptom, not the disease
-- Commentary by Jim Dean
 12/02/2009

"Any dictator would admire the uniformity and obedience of the U.S. media." -- Noam Chomsky

Dear Folks,

http://georgiaheritagecouncil.org/site2/commentary/dean-climategate120209.phtml

The ClimateGate Scandal is breaking into the main media now (see Forbes item below) but is still being ignored by network TV. Their best excuse is the urgent coverage on the Tiger Woods story and Obama's Afghanistan troops speech.

The climate hucksters are stalling for time to figure out how to save their credibility bacon. But Obama is off to the climate summit (Copenhagen) which will go on for several weeks. So now will be the time to roast the liars and deceivers. The Hadley Research Center has announced their own investigation but you can rest assured that will not be completed for a good while. They have a lot of egg on their face for hosting the hoaxers with what appears to be zero supervision on either the data or analysis fraud.

If you are wondering what this all means to you and why I am doing several columns on this, it is because this is a classic example of elitist fraud on an international scale, albeit a liberal one. It is taxpayer funded. They want their budget vastly increased, which is has been, so they are well-funded forever. The best way to do that is to scare the hell out of the public.

"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary." --H.L. MenckenIn Defense of Women, 1918

"All over the place, from the popular culture to the propaganda system, there is constant pressure to make people feel that they are helpless, that the only role they can have is to ratify decisions and to consume." --Noam Chomsky

"When the search for truth is confused with political advocacy, the pursuit of knowledge is reduced to the quest for power." --Alston Chase, quoted by Michael Crichton in Why Politicized Science is Dangerous, excerpted from State of Fear

"Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because you're being had." -- Michael Crichton, Caltech Michelin Lecture, January 17, 2003

And next, you publicly destroy any scientific opponents or dissenting opinion. Recently they coined a new term for climate heretics, 'climate change deniers'...a term concocted for the same purposes as homophobe, holocaust denier, Neo-Confederate. It is Neo N-word terminology, the difference being that the new ones are widely used by Liberals, with no embarrassment or apologies, to discredit their ideological, scientific or historical opponents...classic bully stuff. In terms of propaganda technique, it is the classic 'ad hominem' attack on the person to avoid honest debate of the arguments and evidence. Galileo was silenced by calling him a 'heretic' and threatening him with death by fire. As Voltaire might say, it is dangerous to be right when the government or the Church of Global Warming is wrong.

"The urge to save humanity is almost always a false-face for the urge to rule it." --H.L. Mencken

"Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. " --Michael Crichton, Caltech Michelin Lecture, January 17, 2003

So I ask you, do you think this is the only major mega hoax that the elitists are scamming us on for the last five or ten years? Is it the only one they are running on us even now? I can tell you most assuredly it is not. We are actually being swarmed, so much of it going on. We really need another citizen controlled intelligence service solely devoted to keeping us informed on how the elites are trying to rob us blind and/or make us all nice little Manchurian candidates or laboratory mice.

The enormous waste of public funds is a slam dunk national security issue in my book. But I don't think the FBI or the CIA would want to get into this if you paid them. We have a HUGE oversight failure here. Forget Congress. They are so overloaded they need a 500% increase in manpower to even begin having the investigative manpower to begin getting a handle on the day to day stuff. Medicaid and Medicare fraud control has been beyond their grasp forever.

But nothing is ever going to be done about it until we scream bloody murder. Special prosecutors are the quickest way to go, but those can be faked by rigging who the special prosecutor is and neither Dems or Repubs are shy about that. I am leaning toward a new 5th branch of government. That is how bad I think the situation is and how little faith I have in current institutions doing anything about it. Their hands are full with just what is on their plate now.

Huge problems can only be dealt with through huge counter measures. What will happen if we don't do something significant? They will continue bleeding us dry. Worldwide Megafrauds are the big thing now. Ethanol is another example. The use of carbon based fuels to produce and ship it more than eliminates any benefit in clean air or reduced carbon footprint. Bush pushed it to run corn prices up as a gift to the MidWest farm belt folks and it ran food prices up around the world. A few benefited at the expense of the many.

Another mega scam is the rising cost of education. It has been increasing almost as fast as health care costs. Now with health care it is easy to see we have an aging population with new and very expensive treatments and drugs available. But have you noticed that there is no 'crisis' reporting going on about education costs, or even any in depth reporting as to why the costs are going up so much? Does it really cost 8 to 10% more each year to produce a rookie teacher or history major. What new technology or expensive equipment are they using?

The reason is the same. Education is an elitist bastion and they want the money to keep pouring. And they don't get too much scrutiny on the quality of their product output. Much of it is grownup babysitting for people taking a break from work. Some of you will remember when the Microsoft certifications at technical schools were a two year program. When a shortage developed during the dotcom boom, primarily in help desk personnel, these courses miraculously were shortened to one year. And then later shortened to six months.

Yes, the two year program was just a scam to get two to four times the money out of you. Six months in school and a six month apprenticeship would be adequate but that would cut the schools out of 50% of their money so they would raise holy hell about that...how they were being destroyed by not overcharging for their services.

Forget about Tiger Woods, the latest missing kid or who shot who. All of that is Roman Circus clutter to waste your time so you cannot spend it learning how to defend yourself against the major threats coming at you. The elites know that we sheepeople would have to be organized effectively to really counter what they are doing to us, and plan on doing. They are using the tried and true tactics of diversion plus divide and conquer. If we do not wise up we will lose, and so far....we are losing.

Jim Dean is the producer of Heritage TV and a member of the Georgia Heritage Council.

Sign Up for weekly updates Now!  Like this? SIGN UP now for weekly email updates in your inbox !!  Sign Up for weekly updates Now! 
Contribute now to help us maintain this website and carry on our mission!

"The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out for himself, without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos." --H.L. MenckenSmart Set, 1919

"No country upon earth ever had it more in its power to attain these blessings than United America. Wondrously strange, then, and much to be regretted indeed would it be, were we to neglect the means and to depart from the road which Providence has pointed us to so plainly; I cannot believe it will ever come to pass." --George Washington, letter to Benjamin Lincoln, 1788

Cringing Over Climategate

Shikha Dalmia, Forbes.com, 12.02.09

"Science and scientific process must inform and guide decisions of my administration on a wide range of issues, including … mitigation of climate change," President Barack Obama declared in a not-so-subtle dig at his predecessor soon after assuming office. "The public must be able to trust the science and scientific process. Public officials should not suppress or alter scientific technological findings."

Last week's Climategate scandal is putting Obama's promise to the test. If he wants to pass, there are two things he should do, pronto: (1) Start singing hosannas to whoever broke the scandal instead of acting like nothing has happened; and (2) Ask eco-warriors at the Copenhagen Climate Change Summit next week to declare an immediate cease-fire in their war against global warming pending a complete review of the science.

Someone--a whistleblower or a hacker--got into the computers of University of East Anglia Climate Research Unit in England, also known as the Hadley Research Center, and revealed reams of e-mailsshowing that its leading climatologists had engaged in all kinds of scientific shenanigans including manipulating data, destroying evidence that didn't support their conclusions and keeping contrarian scientists from being published in peer-reviewed journals.

The revelations are significant because the Hadley Center is no marginal outfit. It is among the most influential research organizations in the field whose work forms the basis of all official global warming reports, including those of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the U.N. body that serves as the Vatican of global warming.

One e-mail as recent as last month acknowledged that global temperatures plateaued in 1998, something that skeptics have been pointing out for years and warming warriors have been pooh-poohing. "The fact is that we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment," the e-mail confessed. But instead of celebrating the good news that the planet may not ineluctably fry to a crisp, the e-mail continues with its gloom and doom, blaming an "inadequate observing system" for not picking up on the warming.

This wouldn't be such a big deal if other e-mails didn't show even worse malfeasance. "I've just completed Mike's Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (i.e., from 1981 onwards) and from 1961 for Keith to hide the decline [of temperatures]," one said. To most people with normal IQs, the words "trick" and "hide" in the same sentence would suggest manipulation of data. But the brainiacs at Hadley claim that these are just standard colloquialism that scientists use to describe completely innocent operations.

Really? Then how do they explain this 2005 e-mail by Phil Jones, the director of the center, to the aforementioned Mike. "The two MMs have been after the CRU station data for years. If they ever hear there is a Freedom of Information Act now in the U.K., I think I'll delete the file rather than send to anyone… We also have a data protection act, which I will hide behind." The "two MMs" refers to Canadian researchers Stephen McIntyre and Ross McKitrick. And--lo and behold--when one of them asked Jones for his data, what did he do? He hid behind the data protection act. But no, there is nothing premeditated here!

Why was Jones so afraid of the two MMs? Because they had debunked Mike's--or Michael Mann of Penn State University's--infamous "hockey stick" graph that supposedly offered proof positive that humans were warming the earth. It showed that global temperatures had remained flat for a millennium only to spike sharply in the 20th century following the industrial revolution. But McIntyre and McKitrick found that the innocent "tricks" that Mann was performing on the data were so riddled with methodological errors that even the IPCC was forced to remove the graph from its official reports.

One would have thought that the hockey-stick episode would have instilled some humility in the Hadley gang, prompting them to invite ever greater scrutiny and debate of their work. That is, after all, what real scientists would do. Think again. In fact, the e-mails show that they did the exact opposite. Around the time the "two MMs" went public with their analysis in 2003, Mann urged his colleagues to blacklist Climate Research, a journal that had published research by skeptics. "I think we have to stop considering 'Climate Research' as a legitimate peer-reviewed journal," he wrote. "Perhaps we should encourage our colleagues in the climate research community to no longer submit or cite papers in this journal."

This is precisely the kind of perfidy that undermines public trust in the scientific process that Obama pledged to restore. So if Obama had his priorities straight, he would end his radio silence and thank the authors of Climategate for performing a great public service. Indeed, if President Bush had been so lucky, perhaps fate would have contrived a WMDgate for him before he launched the Iraq invasion and saved him from the worst mistake of his presidency.

It is worth recalling that Bush too was relying on an international consensus--especially reports by U.N. arms inspectors--that Saddam Hussein was sitting atop stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction as a justification for war. "Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised," Bush said in a 2003 prewar declaration calculated to escalate the hysteria level against Saddam. After a two-year-long wild goose chase through the deserts of Iraq, Bush was finally forced to admit that Saddam no longer possessed weapons of mass destruction. But at least the phony consensus on which he based his decision was intact at the eve of the war.

However, Climategate is fast shattering the global warming consensus, and so Obama won't have even that to hide behind should he go ahead and sign up the U.S. to cut its carbon emissions 80% below 2005 levels by 2050 at Copenhagen next week. There is zero chance right now that Congress will endorse these cuts, which will dwarf the trillion-dollar Iraq price tag. So Obama won't really be able to advance his foolish crusade, but he will lose the opportunity to protect his own integrity by joining the growing chorus of voices--some of them of global warming believers--demanding a thorough investigation of this episode. Former Chancellor Lord Lawson is asking the British government to launch a formal inquiry about it. Sen. James Inhofe, an Oklahoma Republican, is doing the same here in the U.S. Penn State is launching an investigation of Mr. Hockey Stick Mann's conduct. Calls for Phil Jones resignation are rising in England.

But the issues go beyond the misconduct of just one outfit. One of the dirty little secrets of the field revealed by the scandal is that climate scientists, though they are publicly funded, don't as a matter of routine make their raw data publicly available. This makes it exceedingly difficult for their peers to replicate their findings, subverting the scientific method at its core. Judy Curry of Georgia Tech, a stalwart in the field who is convinced that global warming is real, is exhorting her colleagues to end this incestuous tribalism and open their work to scrutiny, even of skeptics." Make all your data, metadata and codes openly available," she urges. Meanwhile, George Monbiot--the British media's alarmist-in-chief who has called global warming the "moral question of the 21st century"--is demanding areanalysis of the climate science data.

A complete airing of the science of global warming, which is looking less and less avoidable by the day, might eventually vindicate the claims of climate warriors. Or it might not. The only thing Obama can control in this matter is which side he will support: The truth, or--what he accused his predecessor of--ideology.

Shikha Dalmia is a senior analyst at Reason Foundation and a biweekly columnist at Forbes.

www.forbes.com/2009/12/01/climategate-scandal-science-obama-opinions-columnists-shikha-dalmia.html


Related Links
GHC's HATE WATCH - GeorgiaHeritageCouncil.org (Get the scoop on SPLC and others!)

Interview with Santa Claus on Naughty Climate Change Brown Shirts - Jim Dean, 12/1/09

Fred Singer on the BBC on Climategate and the Science Regarding Global Warming - video, 12/1/09

The Death Blow to Climate Science - Dr. Tim Ball, CFP, 11/29/09

An Inconvenient Truth - Geoff Metcalf, NWV, 11/29/09

The "Scientific" Fraud of Climate Doomsday Mongering - David Theroux, beacon, 11/28/09

Climate Conspiracy: U.K., U.S. "ClimateGates" - Jonathan Bean, beacon, 11/23/09

U.S. to pay $6 Trillion in 'Climate Reparations'? - Dan Gainor, TH, 11/19/09

Barack Obama's Suicide Mission to Copenhagen - Tom DeWeese, NWV, 11/19/09

Galileo Silenced Again - Willie Soon & David Legates, TH, 11/17/09

Predictions of climate change induced natural disasters falling flat - Tony Hake, examiner.com, 11/7/09

Obama's Fireproof Pants
by Jim Dean

Iranian Nuke Hype
by Jim Dean

Wolves in Watchdog Clothing: SPLC & Fellow Travelers
by Jim Dean

Homeland Security Veteran Smear
by Jim Dean

SPLC's Reputation as Frauds & Conmen Grows
by J.A. Davis & Steve Scroggins

Uncle Jo vs. Uncle Mo - X-Files parody

SPLC advises DHS in Secret Meeting - X-Files parody

CasaBunco - X-Files parody

EMAIL THIS    PRINT THIS

Copyright © 2003-2009, GeorgiaHeritageCouncil.org
Georgia Heritage Council | P-6 2363 North Cliff Colony Drive
Gainesville, GA 30501 | Phone: 770.297.4788
Email:   chairman@GeorgiaHeritageCouncil.org

--
NOW AN AMAZON KINDLE BOOK ON YOUR PC, iPHONE OR KINDLE DEVICE:

Debating the Holocaust: A New Look At Both Sides by Thomas Dalton

http://www.amazon.com/DEBATING-HOLOCAUST-Thomas-Dalton-ebook/dp/B002SN9HEW/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1259095221&sr=1-2


Peace.

Michael Santomauro
Editorial Director
Call anytime: 917-974-6367
ReporterNotebook@Gmail.com

__._,_.___
.

__,_._,___

Dec 2, 2009

YOUTUBE: George Carlin - Saving the Planet

 


YOUTUBE: George Carlin - Saving the Planet

Carlin:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eScDfYzMEEw


The Latest Narishkeit from Abe Foxman (or as I call him, the Jewish "Jesse Jackson")

Abe Foxman, America's resident religion baiter, was causing tsooris again. The American Defamation League's notorious noodnik went whining to the officials at the University of California-Santa Barbara to demand that theyinvestigate:

"…[Sociology Professor William] Robinson for introducing materials critical of Israeli state policies in a course on globalization in January.

The materials included a photo essay that Robinson forwarded to students from the Internet and that had been circulating in the public realm. The photos compared images of Israeli abuse against Palestinians during the recent military invasion of Gaza with Nazi abuses during the holocaust. Two students took offense at the images and withdrew from the course, prompting the Anti-Defamation League to pressure the university to investigate Robinson for "anti-Semitism."

Oy! The "nerve" of that no-goodnik Professor Robinson not clearing his curriculum with ADL Gauleiter Foxman before teaching his course. Such "chutzpah"!

When it comes to Abe Foxman, a line from the film Norma Rae says it best: "Kvetchkvetchkvetch."







--
NOW AN AMAZON KINDLE BOOK ON YOUR PC, iPHONE OR KINDLE DEVICE:

Debating the Holocaust: A New Look At Both Sides by Thomas Dalton

http://www.amazon.com/DEBATING-HOLOCAUST-Thomas-Dalton-ebook/dp/B002SN9HEW/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1259095221&sr=1-2


Peace.

Michael Santomauro
Editorial Director
Call anytime: 917-974-6367
ReporterNotebook@Gmail.com

__._,_.___
.

__,_._,___

Controversy Erupts on Holocaust Denial Scene

 


  http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=1101#

Revisionism, Interrupted

Controversy Erupts on Holocaust Denial Scene
By Heidi Beirich
 
 
The small, bizarre world of Holocaust denial — where anti-Semites use shoddy science and tortured historical analyses to try to undermine what they sarcastically call the "Holohoax" — is in an uproar. The brouhaha was set off in January, when Mark Weber, who heads the Institute for Historical Review (IHR), the oldest and for decades the most important American denial outfit, published an explosive essay asking "How Relevant Is Holocaust Revisionism?"

Weber's unexpected conclusion: not very.

Weber's essay argues that the decades-long "Holocaust revisionist" effort has been "as much a hindrance as a help" in fighting what he has now decided is the real enemy — "Jewish-Zionist power." Weber advocates a shift in the movement toward "the real world struggle" against Jewish power. For Weber, debating the existence of the World War II Holocaust of European Jewry has become a waste of time.

Weber's recent speeches have reinforced his move from Holocaust denial — a sort of once-removed assault on the Jews — to a more direct attack on Jews and also Israel. At a July IHR meeting held in Costa Mesa, Calif., Weber hauled out plainly anti-Semitic conspiracy theories, complaining about those "who control political and cultural life, including the education system and the mass media." From the looks of his audience, Weber has ditched his usually professorial-looking denier allies for hard-core anti-Semites, neo-Nazis and heavily tattooed racist skinheads.

Weber did not respond to repeated requests for comment.

Weber's indictment of Holocaust denial as a lost and ultimately unimportant battle has fractured the denialist community and put Weber's future at IHR in doubt. Since its founding in 1978, IHR has been the leading American purveyor of denial propaganda. Created by veteran anti-Semite Willis Carto, IHR published the premier periodical on the topic, The Journal of Historical Review, with the look and feel of a real academic publication but without any of the usual academic standards. In 1993, Weber helped wrest IHR away from Carto in a nasty legal battle that even featured a standoff at the group's then-headquarters in Newport Beach, Calif.

Until Weber took over, IHR was known predominantly for two things: the Journal and, starting in 1979, nearly annual Holocaust denial conferences that included prominent movement figures and featured anti-Semites like Wolf Rudiger Hess, son of Hitler deputy Rudolf Hess, and Maj. Gen. Otto Ernst Remer, an officer under Hitler whose anti-Semitic activities resulted in his 1986 conviction under German hate-crime laws.

Both efforts would fall by the wayside once Weber took over IHR as its director in 1995. In 2002, Weber stopped publishing the Journalbecause of a "lack of staff and funding." IHR now has been reduced to little more than publishing Web commentary on news articles and various posts from Weber, who also gives a few speeches each year. And the group has held only two conferences since 1994.

Though Weber's failure to bring IHR's journal back from the dead had been criticized, most notably in a 2002 essay by imprisoned denier Germar Rudolf, most of Weber's fellow travelers kept their concerns private. Most importantly, IHR's board stood by him. But Weber's January essay changed that.

In the essay, Weber wrote that the movement had achieved "little success in convincing people that the familiar Holocaust story is defective." He berated denialists for being of little use in defeating the more serious problem facing the world — "a phenomenal increase in Jewish influence and power." Noting that IHR's sales of materials related to the Holocaust were in steady decline while requests for interviews and materials on "the role of Jews in society" were on the rise, Weber argued that denial no longer played "a central role" in the battle against Jewish influence, which should now focus on fighting "Jewish-Zionist power."

Perhaps more heretically, Weber's essay went on to affirm that at least some of the Holocaust actually occurred. Citing Nazi Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels, Weber wrote, "Jews in Europe were, in fact, singled out during the war years for especially severe treatment." Weber concludes that Jews in Europe were "wiped out" and, when the war ended in 1945, most of them "were gone."

The Counterattack
Days after Weber posted his essay, the former editor of IHR's Journal, Theodore O'Keefe, mocked Weber for turning his back on "breakthroughs" — the result of years of hard work by deniers — in exchange for "a few more radio interviews and speaking invitations." O'Keefe assailed Weber for abandoning the truth for a "Halfocaust." He said Weber deserved no sympathy after "the responsibility that he has shirked, and the trust he has betrayed in his striving to replace veracity with expediency."

O'Keefe's sentiments were reiterated by many other deniers, including Arthur Butz, a well-known Holocaust denier who teaches engineering at Northwestern University and is the author of The Hoax of the Twentieth Century: The Case Against the Presumed Extermination of European Jewry. Butz wrote that "Weber is not a revisionist" and "not one of us." Richard Widmann, webmaster of the denialist Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust (CODOH), said IHR "is no longer part of our struggle. The time has come to move on." And French denier Serge Thion reacted viscerally to Weber's use of the word "hindrance" to describe Holocaust denial. "A Hindrance? Certainly not," Thion wrote, adding that denial was a "hammer for many anvils."

In February, a more personal attack came from the wife of Ernst Zundel, a man who is a prolific neo-Nazi publisher and propagandist now serving time in Germany for Holocaust denial. The Zundels had been close to Weber, whom they at one time employed as a spokesman. Saddened by it all, Ingrid Rimland Zundel slammed Weber in her newsletter,Power: Personal Opinions of Ingrid Zundel. Under the title "'Friendly Fire' from unexpected quarters," Rimland Zundel denounced Weber for his "act of duplicity," "perplexing" views, and "having run IHR right into the ground." She also reproduced excerpts of several other attacks on Weber.

Rimland Zundel declined to comment on the conflict, telling the Intelligence Report that it was "a family quarrel."

The clearest condemnation of all came from Robert Faurisson, a French Holocaust denier who was fined for defamation by a French court in 1983 when his revisionist writings were found to violate hate-speech laws. In the March edition of CODOH's Smith's Report, Faurisson wrote a lengthy attack on Weber entitled "Mark Weber Must Resign from the Institute for Historical Review."

Faurisson demanded that Weber leave IHR and create a different institution to fight "Jewish-Zionist power." Faurisson implied that a cowardly Weber was leaving the movement for fear of being jailed, writing that Weber is "fully aware that it's always highly dangerous" to question the Holocaust. Faurisson's conclusion was that Weber "disgraced himself" and "must therefore resign."

By June, a new website had appeared under the title of "Mark Weber Must Go." That same month, both Weber and Bradley Smith, the American denier who founded and runs CODOH, were interviewed for a four-part story that ran in the pages of Tablet, a liberal online magazine of Jewish news, ideas and culture. Most of the story consisted of each man calling the other a fraud. Weber denounced Smith and Faurisson as having "their identities tied to Holocaust revisionism in a way that isn't healthy." The Tablet article did confirm, after years of rumors, that Weber indeed has a sister who converted to Judaism.

Weber & Friends
Though hot and heavy in the Holocaust denial community, the controversy over Weber's views didn't even come up at his July speech in Costa Mesa, Calif., where he spoke about the non-Jewish victims of World War II, or what he called "the unknown Holocaust of non-Jews," along with Jewish control of such things as the media. Weber also told the audience that California now has a "third-world population" due to immigration from Latin America.

That seemed to suit the audience just fine and none of them asked him about his January essay denouncing Holocaust denial. That's probably because the hotel conference room where Weber spoke was filled with extremists who would certainly agree that the Jews in general are a better target than the Holocaust. A particularly notable audience member was Kevin MacDonald, the California State, Long Beach, professor who says that Jews are genetically driven to undermine white society by pushing liberal policies such as non-white immigration. Also there was white nationalist activist Jamie Kelso, who for years worked for former Klansman David Duke and, more recently, as a moderator of the racist website Stormfront.org.

The other speaker on the bill that day was David Irving, probably the best-known Holocaust denier in the world. Irving started his talk by alleging that the numbers of dead in the Allied bombing of Dresden, Germany, were severely undercounted. He then described a bizarre conspiracy involving Enigma coding machines and a massive British spy operation after the war that gave Britain access to the secret message traffic of several small nations in the Southern hemisphere. Telling the audience "many people in this room will not want to hear this," Irving, like Weber, admitted that more than 1.2 million Jews were killed at several camps. But he added that he thought this was all the work of Heinrich Himmler. Hitler, he said, merely wanted "to move Jews to Madagascar."

 

--
NOW AN AMAZON KINDLE BOOK ON YOUR PC, iPHONE OR KINDLE DEVICE:

Debating the Holocaust: A New Look At Both Sides by Thomas Dalton

http://www.amazon.com/DEBATING-HOLOCAUST-Thomas-Dalton-ebook/dp/B002SN9HEW/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1259095221&sr=1-2


Peace.

Michael Santomauro
Editorial Director
Call anytime: 917-974-6367
ReporterNotebook@Gmail.com

__._,_.___
.

__,_._,___