Translate

Jun 10, 2010

New conspiracy theory...

 



The Chronicle of Higher Education


Next

...

June 9, 2010, 04:09 PM ET

Deadly Conspiracies, Fueled by Reputations and Doubts

Merchants-of-Doubt-dust-cover-20101-197x300.jpg After enduring decades of inexplicably persistent news reports casting doubt on the fact that cigarettes cause lung cancer, pollution harms the planet, and nuclear weapons are extremely dangerous, one might be forgiven for wondering if the same mob of misguided mercenaries might be behind them all.

As it turns out—according to the evidence assembled in Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming, just published this month by Bloomsbury Press—they are.

Much the way meteorologists can now demonstrate the clear correlation between increasing carbon emissions and rising global temperatures, the book's authors—Naomi Oreskes, a professor of history and science studies at the University of California at San Diego, and Erik M. Conway, a historian at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena—show the links between a small group of renowned researchers and the public confusion they've skillfully sown since the 1950s about a series of basic and critical scientific facts.

The deniers, according to Oreskes and Conway, are typically well-respected scientists whose strong political convictions led them to repeatedly publicize their beliefs in areas of research outside their fields of professional expertise.

Orchestrated by industry allies and other financial backers, Oreskes and Conway show, these self-appointed experts again and again followed the same basic formula: finding the tiny statistical variation of result that can exist in the final outcome of almost any scientific test, and then exploiting the media's thirst for conflict to miscast that often-insignificant variation into an image of genuine intellectual controversy.

A classic example: The basic causes and widespread implications of acid rain were well understood by 1980, but scientists couldn't be sure exactly what proportions of the problem could be assigned to which specific factors - such as the increasing usage of fossil fuels or the growing tendency of power plants to use of taller smokestacks. The Reagan administration, Oreskes and Conway said, seized upon that largely irrelevant uncertainty to argue that no new regulation was necessary at all.

With formidable forces still in place in 2010 to deny facts such as the man-made nature of global warming, Oreskes and Conway may only be providing confirmation of a conspiracy that many people have already come to recognize. The question they may have left untackled is whether American consumers and voters, increasingly aware of the fact that they've been misled all these years, are now willing to pay the costs that science says they must pay, or if they'll find it more comfortable to just keep playing along with their convenient deceptions.—Paul Basken





--


Dalton's Holocaust Radio Debate on April 24, 2010:

http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/Barrett_10.html

Peace.

Michael Santomauro
Editorial Director
Call anytime: 917-974-6367
ReporterNotebook@Gmail.com

http://www.DebatingTheHolocaust.com

Amazon's: DEBATING THE HOLOCAUST: A New Look At Both Sides by Thomas Dalton

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.


Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.


Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.

.

__,_._,___

An interesting revelation about what Helen Thomas's attackers really believe

 

June 10, 2010

An interesting revelation about what Helen Thomas's attackers really believe

CounterPunch has just published my article about Helen Thomas, and we've also posted an annotated version with links, photos and videos on our news site as well.

It's interesting to see the misreporting on Thomas's words. For example, nowhere did she say the word "Jews."

Another point also tells more about her critics than about her.

When one actually views the video, it appears that Thomas is referring to Israeli settlers. (Truthfully, the correct word should be colonists, but I'll use the commonly employed euphemism).

Her words are: "Tell them to get the hell out of Palestine. Remember, these people are occupied. And it's their land…"

The reference to "occupied" would normally suggest the West Bank and Gaza, the Palestinian Occupied Territories.  However, her attackers almost universally seem to have taken her words as referring to all of Israel.

In other words, in a sort of Freudian slip, her attackers acknowledge that all of the land of Palestine is occupied.

Interesting.


http://alisonweir.org/journal/2010/6/9/an-interesting-revelation-about-what-helen-thomass-attackers.html



--
Alison Weir
Executive Director
If Americans Knew
office: (202) 631-4060

"Nobody made a greater mistake than he who did nothing because he could only do a little."
- Edmund Burke

Daily News compilation:
http://israel-palestinenews.org



--


Dalton's Holocaust Radio Debate on April 24, 2010:

http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/Barrett_10.html

Peace.

Michael Santomauro
Editorial Director
Call anytime: 917-974-6367
ReporterNotebook@Gmail.com

http://www.DebatingTheHolocaust.com

Amazon's: DEBATING THE HOLOCAUST: A New Look At Both Sides by Thomas Dalton

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.


Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.


Get real-time World Cup coverage on the Yahoo! Toolbar. Download now to win a signed team jersey!

.

__,_._,___

ISRAEL'S 'SELF DEFENSE' IS DESTROYING THE WORLD

 


ISRAEL'S 'SELF DEFENSE' IS DESTROYING THE WORLD

Israel right to self defense

by Sameh A. Habeeb

Israel has been pursuing its cry-wolf policy since its inception. Successive Israeli
regimes have followed the same tactic of presenting their own nation as the victim of aggression. All the major news firms and corporations have taken the same line. "Israel as victim', has filled the headlines. These days there are more examples than ever.

Israel has been justifying its attacks and deadly wars against Palestinians and Arabs in terms of their right to self-defense. Here are some of the messages we hear from the Israelis over and over again:

"We are encircled by the Arabs."

"We are encircled by terrorists."

"We are living in the tough area of the Middle East."

"We are fighting for our existence."

"Our nukes are for the purpose of protection."

"The Gaza siege is a legal means to stop rocket attack."

"Settlements are a legal means to protect our Jewish Identity."

Any audience worldwide hearing only this account might believe what they hear. It is normal for any body and everybody to seek safety and security as a basic need. People worldwide and specifically in America, which is the foremost supporter of Israel, will be convinced.
For as long as these fictions are promulgated along media wires and echoed by reputable institutions, Israel will continue to defy international law and humanitarian charters. More human rights will be violated.

In the 1967 war, Israel captured hundreds of Egyptian soldiers. According to international law, Israel should have protected them before taking them to court or banishing them to prison. But Israel massacred them in the desert. We never heard of any subsequent
investigation by the international community. Whose rights of self defense were infringed on that occasion?

Massacres, like Sabra and Shatila, have been perpetrated in Lebanon. The Israeli version of this story is that, "we invaded Lebanon to kick out Palestinian fighters. Or to protect our borders. It's all about self defense." But disproportionate force was used by Israel:
thousands of Palestinians/Lebanese were killed in such massacres. In 1996 and 2006 in its wars on Lebanon, Israel bombarded the UN compounds and killed hundreds of civilians and UN forces. All this was on the grounds of self defense.

The siege of Gaza and the one-sided war was part of Israeli self defense strategy. Very limited attacks have been launched against Israel but the Israeli response has always been deadly. The useless rockets of Hamas have been used as a pretext by Israel to launch its
attacks. They are the reason given for imposing the siege. However, the facts on the ground are different.

Israeli self-defense

The legal dictionary of Gerald N. Hill and Kathleen T. Hill (1981-2005 by) defines self-defense as," self-defense n. the use of reasonable force to protect oneself or members of the family from bodily harm from the attack of an aggressor, if the defender has reason to believe he/she/they is/are in danger. Self-defense is a common defense by a person accused of assault, battery, or homicide. The force used in self-defense may be sufficient for protection from apparent harm (not just an empty verbal threat) or to halt any danger from attack, but cannot be an excuse to continue the attack or use excessive force."

You only have to look at the last six decades. Before its establishment; Israel ethnically cleansed more than 800,000 Palestinians. More than 530 villages were viciously destroyed before it even existed. Wars then were launched against Syria, Egypt, Lebanon and Jordan. Attacks and military operations of Israel in the name of self defense reached Tunisia, Iraq, Algeria and Morocco. Add to that, a hundred or more operations that took place across Asia, Africa, Europe and North America.

From 1967 to 2008 more than 800.000 Palestinians were imprisoned by Israel.

From 29/9/200 to 31/12/2008 more than 5901 Palestinians were killed. The same period witnessed up to 40,000 injured people. On the other side, around 1000 Israeli were killed. There is a huge and vast gap between the numbers. Additionally, 1440 Palestinians were killed in Gaza. The ratio is around 8 Palestinians killed for each Israeli.

Rockets Issue and Self-defense

The official website of the Israeli Foreign Affairs ministry states that 1,750 rockets and 1,528 mortar bombs fired from the Gaza Strip struck southern Israel in 2008. This is understandably shocking for anyone who reads this. The term rocket or mortar or missile induces fear in any ordinary onlooker. Israel uses such statistics and numbers to deflect the attention of the international mainstream media and those who consume it. If we suppose Israel is right about this, then why don't we see Israel giving more details about these rockets? Why
does Israel not show the pictures of the victims of these rockets? Why don't we see the damaged cities, town, and village?

Clearly these rockets are ineffective and useless. According to the BBC, since 2001, when the rockets were first fired, more than 8,600 have hit southern Israel, nearly 6,000 of them since Israel withdrew from Gaza in August 2005. The rockets have killed 28 people and
injured hundreds more.

This is 28 people killed and hundreds injured too many. But note that there is a huge gap between the number of victims and the number of rockets. If this leads us to any conclusion, it must be that these rockets are primitive, inexact and ineffective. The rockets are just
another scapegoat that Israel uses to justify its ongoing attacks against Palestinian civilians.

Some Palestinian factions have now stopped firing these rockets as Hamas did, from June to December 2009. What happened? A full- scale war was launched in late 2009 that took the lives of more than 1440 Palestinians, mostly civilians. The arithmetic is like this: 28
Israelis killed by rocket attacks in nine years while 1440 Palestinians were killed in only 3 weeks in the last war on Gaza. There is no way to compare the two sides. The self defense argument deployed by Israel should be renamed its policy of aggression. Self defense empowers victims to use sufficient power to defend themselves. But from the Israeli government we only see excessive force used against civilians.

Written FOR

Add a comment to this post



--


Dalton's Holocaust Radio Debate on April 24, 2010:

http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/Barrett_10.html

Peace.

Michael Santomauro
Editorial Director
Call anytime: 917-974-6367
ReporterNotebook@Gmail.com

http://www.DebatingTheHolocaust.com

Amazon's: DEBATING THE HOLOCAUST: A New Look At Both Sides by Thomas Dalton

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___

Are the defenders of ‘Antisemitism’ losing their edge ?

 


Dear Editor:

The world, Abe Foxman and Zionism are long overdue for this message.  I think I have touched on all the necessary bases, firmly.

I have, thrust the spear of challenge directly into the teeth of the beast, and expect some rather harsh and direct response.  They will probably not be satisfied to sit back and try to sneer me off the page with mild epithets such as those of which I have just disarmed them.

Please read on.....


Are the defenders of 'Antisemitism' losing their edge ?



--

Debbie Menon
http://mycatbirdseat.com/
http://www.intifada-palestine.com!!
"Shaking off" is the literal translation of: Intifada




--


Dalton's Holocaust Radio Debate on April 24, 2010:

http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/Barrett_10.html

Peace.

Michael Santomauro
Editorial Director
Call anytime: 917-974-6367
ReporterNotebook@Gmail.com

http://www.DebatingTheHolocaust.com

Amazon's: DEBATING THE HOLOCAUST: A New Look At Both Sides by Thomas Dalton

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.


Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.


Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.

.

__,_._,___

Helen Thomas and Truth too hot

 


>>
>> ***
>>
>> HELEN THOMAS AND A TRUTH TOO HOT TO HANDLE
>>
>> by Michael Hoffman | June 8, 2010
>> Copyright (c) 2010 by RevisionistHistory.org
>>
>> This column is online at: http://revisionistreview.blogspot.com
>>
>>
>> --^----------------------------------------------------------

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.


Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.


Get real-time World Cup coverage on the Yahoo! Toolbar. Download now to win a signed team jersey!

.

__,_._,___

Jun 9, 2010

Kevin MacDonald Reviews James Edwards’ New Book, “Racism Schmacism” | American Third Position

 

http://american3p.org/?p=760

Peace.
Michael Santomauro @ 917-974-6367

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.


Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.


Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.

.

__,_._,___

Australian flotilla survivors describe brutality: "I've never met anyone whose heart has become so hard ... in my life"

 


Australian flotilla survivors describe brutality: "I've never met anyone whose heart has become so hard ... in my life"

pulsemedia.org | June 10, 2010 at 3:17 am | Categories: Israel, Palestine, Video | URL: http://wp.me/ppCFZ-6lT

Shot Australian Ahmed Luqman recalls flotilla ordeal on Australian public broadcaster ABC with his wife Jerry Luqman. Also check out Alison Weir's excellent piece, While Israel Maims and Kills: the Outrage at Helen Thomas (h/t Aletho News). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZWmWZluknY

Read more of this post

Add a comment to this post


__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.


Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.


Get real-time World Cup coverage on the Yahoo! Toolbar. Download now to win a signed team jersey!

.

__,_._,___