Translate

Jun 10, 2010

Why some Jews would rather live in Siberia than Israel - CSMonitor.com

 


By Alfonso Daniels, Contributor / June 7, 2010



--


Dalton's Holocaust Radio Debate on April 24, 2010:

http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/Barrett_10.html

Peace.

Michael Santomauro
Editorial Director
Call anytime: 917-974-6367
ReporterNotebook@Gmail.com

http://www.DebatingTheHolocaust.com

Amazon's: DEBATING THE HOLOCAUST: A New Look At Both Sides by Thomas Dalton

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.


Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.


Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.

.

__,_._,___

'We'll be Back - With Bigger Flotillas'

 


A very good interview with Huwaida Arraf.

 

http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=51753

 

'We'll be Back - With Bigger Flotillas'
Mel Frykberg interviews HUWAIDA ARRAF, a leader of the Free Gaza flotilla

Huwaida Arraf / Credit:Mel Frykberg/IPS
Huwaida Arraf 

Credit:Mel Frykberg/IPS


RAMALLAH, Jun 8, 2010 (IPS) - In an exclusive interview with IPS Huwaida Arraf, the chairwoman of the Free Gaza (FG) movement, which tried to break Israel's crippling blockade on Gaza, explains what happened on the night of May 31 when Israeli commandos raided the FG humanitarian flotilla, shooting nine people dead and injuring dozens more.

Controversy surrounds the events following the deadly commando raid with survivors from among the 700 activists on board the flotilla giving a very different version of events from that of the Israeli government. 

Q: Critics have accused FG of deliberately provoking a confrontation with the Israelis and argued that the attempt to break the siege was political and not just a humanitarian relief operation. 

A: They are correct to say that FG's aim was more than just bringing humanitarian relief. We are deeply disturbed by Israel's deliberate and calculated creation of a humanitarian crisis in the coastal territory and we intended to draw international attention to this. 

We are not interested in simply perpetuating the siege and the humanitarian crisis by bringing in aid alone. Gazans are not interested in being aid dependent either. Eighty percent of Gaza's population is dependent on food aid. This is not the result of a natural disaster but a deliberate and cruel Israeli policy. We are concerned that the human rights of Gazans be respected and they are allowed to live a normal life as human beings. 

Q: Did the activists provoke the Israeli commandos into using deadly force? 

A: This is nonsense. We went out of our way to inform the Israelis that we were an unarmed civilian boat delivering aid, that we presented no threat to them and there was no need to board our vessels. We explained repeatedly who we were and what our mission was. Our boats were checked by different security at the various ports of departure and we also hired independent security personnel to verify that we were arms-free. 

We were attacked in international waters, in the middle of the night when most people were asleep. The Israelis used a highly-trained naval force, not the coastguard, against unarmed civilians. 

Q: But videos show activists beating Israeli navy seals with bars. 

A: Let's not forget the Israelis confiscated all equipment from the media and released selective video footage so as to try and justify their extreme violence. 

Furthermore, this was the response of a small number of individuals out of nearly 700 people. The FG organisers specifically held workshops for passengers prior to departure to explain how to respond in a non-violent way to an attack on the boat. However, the Israelis attacked first by shooting even before the commandos had boarded. 

When such unjustified violence is used against a civilian vessel, in international waters, which poses no threat to Israel's security it is not always possible to control the response of some people who are scared, angry and who may wish to defend themselves. 

Q: You were not on board the 'Mavi Marmara' where the violence took place. How do you know the Israelis attacked first? 

A: I was on board 'Challenger One' which was sailing right next to 'Mavi Marmara'. I saw the Israeli dinghies surrounding the 'Mavi Marmara'. I heard the explosions as they started shooting. They were unable to board because activists trained hoses on them. This was before the helicopters arrived and the navy seals succeeded in boarding. It was after this that people were shot dead. 

Q: Reports are coming out that a number of the dead were shot several times in the head from above. 

A: I've heard this too from eye-witness accounts but am awaiting further information. 

Q: Activists have also claimed that during the first few hours after the assault the dying and seriously injured were deliberately denied medical treatment. 

A: This is true. 

Q: The Israelis state that violence was only used against the passengers on the 'Mavi Marmara' who resisted. Do you agree with this? 

A: This is a lie. The Israelis used excessive force and violence on all the boats even when no resistance was offered. Journalists were attacked, some activists were beaten so badly that they needed to be hospitalised when they arrived in Ashdod. 

An Israeli commando stood on my head with his boot and ground my head into the deck until I screamed. I was handcuffed and a hood was put over my head. Later on in Ashkelon I was hit through the face by a policeman, elbowed in the jaw and dragged by my hair when I refused to get into a police car. 

Q: The Israelis claim that some on board were 'terrorists' and had ties to 'terrorist' organisations including al-Qaida and Hamas. What is your response? 

A: This is part of their propaganda and an attempt to discredit FG. They can't de-legitimise the hundreds on board, who included European Union parliamentarians, international journalists and ordinary citizens from over 40 countries as 'Jihadists', so they focused on a few individuals. I don't know all of the activists personally so I don't know what their political views are but the FG is not connected to any political organisation. 

The Turkish charity Isani Yardim Vakfi or IHH which helped organise the flotilla, and had volunteers on board, provides humanitarian aid all over the world. It has an office in Gaza and probably has to deal with the Hamas authorities there as they are in charge. So do all the other international NGOs including the Red Cross and the U.N. It is just a fact of life in Gaza. There is no military association. 

Q: The Israelis distributed doctored videos which they confiscated from journalists on board, as well as an edited audio tape which they later retracted and corrected. In the audio an 'activist' is alleged to tell the Israelis, amongst other slurs, "to go back to Auschwitz." What are your comments? 

A: I was near the VHF radio the entire time the captains communicated with the Israelis. The captains were the only people who spoke with the Israelis apart from myself. They spoke in a professional manner and I can confirm none of those slurs were made. The so-called 'activist' who made the alleged slurs spoke in a phony American accent from the south. We had no Americans on board from the south. They also said I was on board the 'Mavi Marmara' but I was on the 'Challenger One'. 

Furthermore, the Israelis were forced to retract and correct the original tape. A new one was released five days later but there are still discrepancies. 

Q: Do you believe that despite the bloodshed and loss of life that the FG campaign has helped highlight the humanitarian situation in Gaza? 

A: I believe increased international attention has been drawn to Israel's inhumane siege of Gaza and that there will be more pressure on Israel to ease the blockade. This is part of an overall snowball effect to Israel's occupation of the Palestinian territories in general following campaigning by grassroots activists. This in turn has led to political involvement on an international and diplomatic level. 

Q: The Israelis possibly hoped that the extreme force they used would prevent future FG boats trying to reach Gaza. Have they succeeded? 

A: Quite the opposite actually. We have been inundated with people from all over the world, from various organisations, wanting to participate in future flotillas. People everywhere are outraged by Israel's behaviour. 

Q: What are the future plans of GF? 

A: More boats and bigger flotillas until we break the siege on Gaza completely. We will be back. 

(END)
 


--


Dalton's Holocaust Radio Debate on April 24, 2010:

http://www.americanfreedomradio.com/Barrett_10.html

Peace.

Michael Santomauro
Editorial Director
Call anytime: 917-974-6367
ReporterNotebook@Gmail.com

http://www.DebatingTheHolocaust.com

Amazon's: DEBATING THE HOLOCAUST: A New Look At Both Sides by Thomas Dalton

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.


Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.


Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.

.

__,_._,___

Another Ponzi scammer

 



From: Manuel Sotil <msotil@gmail.com>
Date: June 10, 2010 3:09:02 PM EDT

What if the chosen had taken up basketball instead?

"Scott Rothstein had admitted selling shares in fabricated legal settlements and using some of the money to pay previous investors in a Ponzi scheme."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/us_and_canada/10281116.stm


__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.


Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.


Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.

.

__,_._,___

Kevin MacDonald: Shocker! Abe Foxman is a hypocrite. « The Occidental Observer Blog

 

http://theoccidentalobserver.net/tooblog/?p=2190

Peace.
Michael @ 917-974-6367

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.


Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.


Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.

.

__,_._,___

The Occidental Observer Newsletter - Caryl Johnston: Remembering Douglas Reed PLUS Blogs by Joe Webb and Kevin MacDonald

 
__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.


Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.


Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.

.

__,_._,___

"Kristallnacht" - another false road flare?

 



Kristallnacht in Perspective

In November 1938 a Jew, Herschel Grynspan, shot a low level German diplomat in Paris, Ernst Vom Rath, killing him. Shortly thereafter a huge pogrom against Jews erupted in Germany called Kristallnacht, (or Crystal Night) . Synagogues and Jewish businesses were attacked, a huge amount of property damage was done and 91 Jews were killed.

The French authorities planned to put Grynspan on trial. The trial was forestalled by the German invasion of France the following year. Grynspan then turned himself in to the French authorities in Toulouse in Vichy occupied France. The Germans demanded his extradition to Germany; the French complied.

Grynspan supposedly acted alone in assassinating Vom Rath. But there are legitimate reasons for doubting it. Grynspan was poor and had no visible means of support. Yet Grynspan, a Polish Jew, was in contact in Paris with an organization, the LICRA, ("The League Against Racism and Anti-Semitism") before he shot Von Rath. After he shot Vom Rath, it was "The League" which provided his lawyer, Morro Giaferri, free of charge.

Did the LICRA, a known Zionist organization, hire Herschel Grynspan to assassinate Vom Rath? A German lady, Ingrid Weckert, argues this thesis very convincingly in her book, "Flashpoint". [Feuerzeichen in German]

To understand why the Zionists would hire a Jew to assassinate a German diplomat, one must understand the political alignments of the time. In November 1938 when the assassination took place, the British Empire, then in control of Palestine, was considering cutting off further Jewish immigration to the Holy Land. Such immigration was alienating the Arabs. In the spring/early summer of 1939 the British issued their famous White Paper proclaiming that no Jewish state would be created in Palestine and that no further Jewish immigration would be permitted after five years without Arab consent.

The Zionists in November 1938 knew what was coming. Their contacts within the British Government had alerted them. The Zionists needed a way to pressure HMG into allowing continued immigration.

Enter Herschel Grynspan and the LICRA. If the German government could be provoked into an anti-Semitic outrage through the premeditated murder of a German diplomat, then the resulting persecution in Germany could be used to keep immigration to Palestine open. "The Jews are being persecuted in Germany! How dare the British deny the Jews refuge in Palestine!" would be the battle cry. And, of course, Nazi persecution of the Jews had always been useful to the Zionists from day one of the Hitler regime. Jewish aliyah, or return to Palestine, had been in sharp decline during the 1920's, until Nazi persecution revived it.

Did the LICRA and international Zionism put Herschel Grynspan up to the murder? We will never know. As to Grynspan himself, his denouement in Germany is quite interesting. Originally the Nazis intended to put him on trial to prove that international Jewry had forced Germany into the war. However, there were problems. Von Rath had been a known homosexual. Grynspan's lawyer, Giaferri, had concocted a story that Grynspan and Vom Rath had been having an affair. Although this was false, to have the fact of Vom Rath's homosexuality brought out at trial would have been embarrassing.  (Under French law, political assassination was a guillotine offense. If Giaferri could have demonstrated that Grynspan acted as a jilted lover, that might have spared him the guillotine.) Moreover, the German courts were not entirely convinced that they had the legal authority to try Grynspan. Grynspan was not a German citizen; he was a Polish Jew who had migrated to Germany on a passport and then moved to Paris. His crime had been committed on French, not German soil.

In the event, Herschel Grynspan was never put on trial. Some believe that he was eventually executed by the Germans in Sachsenhausen concentration camp according to the testimonies of certain inmates; others believe he survived the war under an assumed identity.

Whatever really happened to Herschel Grynspan, he was merely a pawn in a much bigger game. Whether Ingrid Weckert is right or not, Grynspan's foolish act served larger purposes.

Kristallnacht did not intimidate the British into reopening Palestine to Jewish immigration, even if that had been the hidden Zionist intent. The shot which killed Ernst Vom Rath was not the "shot heard round the world". It was, however, a shot which concealed much deeper political intrigues, intrigues whose parameters continue to the present day. Those intrigues are as little understood by the man-un-the-street now as they were then.

Source:  E-Mail sent to the Zundelsite.

=====

[Editorial Comment:  While I don't know the details of this story, I can report what I heard from many different sources - namely, that Kristallnacht was a false flag operation to brand Hitler as a "Jew Hater" for all the world to see.  In other words, it was a calculated smear campaign to show the Germans up as brutes and the Jews as the eternal victims.  The last thing Hitler needed in 1938 was this monumental public relations disaster - from which his regime, as a matter of record, never recovered.]
_______________________________________________


__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.


Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.


Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.

.

__,_._,___

The Crucifixion of Kindness

 


The Crucifixion of Kindness by Gilad  Atzmon

Killing Christ is realised symbolically as an assault on goodness, a crime against kindness and innocence. The cold blooded slaughter of peace activists in international waters has a very similar effect. It is an assault on compassion, righteousness and humanism. It is an attack on everything Christianity and Islam happen to value. As much as Israelis, Zionists and Neocons are insisting on  spreading the deceptive myth of a Judeo-Christian alliance, it is this last Israeli crime that made it clear that the Jewish State shares nothing with humanism, Christianity or Islam. Israel in fact stands against any recognised Western value.
 
To read more:
 


 

       

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.


Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.


Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.

.

__,_._,___