Speaking of classic books..... [1 Attachment]

 

[Attachment(s) from ReporterNotebook included below]

From: The Patriot Dames <subie-sisters@thepatriotdames.net>
Date: Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 9:12 PM
Subject: Speaking of classic books.....
To: reporternotebook@gmail.com


Michael,

I've attached and printed out here a paper I recently wrote on 'The Emperor's New Clothes.'  If you think it relevant, I hope you pass it around.  I even signed my name to it.

Also, some of the USS Liberty crew members are doing a mass emailing to Glenn Beck on MONDAY December 13th asking that he have the crew members on.  This is a ONE day thing.  His email is:

me@glennbeck.com

I hope you will consider sending this out to your trusted email list so they can each send their own emails.  You'll at least get one from me!  LOL
Susie
 ----------------------------------
Beware of the Weavers
By Susan Purtee


       This article is a comparison between two versions of the story, The Emperor's New Clothes; one by the original author, Hans Christian Andersen (1800s) and the other by Steven Spielberg (1998).  Mr. Spielberg's version severely alters the original Andersen's unadulterated version, but why?
According to Wikipedia, Hollis Robbins, Hollis Robbins, in "The Emperor's New Critique" (2003), argues that the tale is itself so transparent "that there has been little need for critical scrutiny."  Robbins argues that Andersen's tale "quite clearly rehearses four contemporary controversies: the institution of a meritocratic civil service, the valuation of labor, the expansion of democratic power, and the appraisal of art."  Robbins concludes that the story's appeal lies in its "seductive resolution" of the conflict by the truth-telling boy.

In The Annotated Hans Christian Andersen (2008), folk and fairy tale researcher Maris Tatar offers a scholarly investigation and analysis of the story, drawing on Robbins's political and sociological analysis of the tale. Tatar points out that Robbins indicates the swindling weavers are simply insisting that "the value of their labor be recognized apart from its material embodiment", and notes that Robbins considers the ability of some in the tale to see the invisible cloth as "a successful enchantment."

Tatar observes that "The Emperor's New Clothes" is one of Andersen's best known tales and one that has acquired an iconic status globally as it migrates across various cultures reshaping itself with each retelling in the manner of oral folktales.  Scholars have noted that the phrase 'Emperor's new clothes' has become a standard metaphor for anything that smacks of pretentiousness, pomposity, social hypocrisy, collective denial, or hollow ostentatiousness. Historically, the tale established Andersen's reputation as a children's author whose stories actually imparted lessons of value for his juvenile audience, and "romanticized" children by "investing them with the courage to challenge authority and to speak truth to power."

       David Spielberg's movie version, however, imparts different values.  In his movie, with a star-studded cast, Spielberg plays up deceit, vanity, envy and a flurry of Jewish phrases woven not into a story to give children the courage to challenge authority but more to present kind and fair authority as being foolish.   How did he do this?

       To accomplish a change in the original version of the story by Andersen, Spielberg first changed the format of the story.  Andersen's version was short and sweet:  The Emperor was vain and some swindlers came to town with a plot to fool the Emperor with a wild story about some fabric they could weave that only those who were unfit for office or unforgivably stupid could not see.  In Spielberg's version, a moth tells the story and every character in it, including a physician (played by Dr. Ruth Westheimer in the movie), Ladies in Waiting, a Prince and a Princess, a Wizard, and the Honest Boy (played by Steven Spielberg) are either envious of the Emperor or say nothing because they don't want to loose their job.  The mirror, royal throne, his underwear and even the horn have an opinion.  The horn states, "Trust me, you ain't seen nothing yet!  Oy Vey."  Some, like the Prime Minister named Cedric, want to embarrass the Emperor and take over the throne.  Ah, the plot thickens.

       In Andersen's story, only the Emperor was vain and everyone under his command pacified him because they thought something was wrong with them.  Those that were sent by the Emperor to view the cloth thought they must be unfit or stupid if they could not see it.  They questioned themselves and were afraid to let the Emperor know.  Even the Emperor thought his eyes must be deceiving him when he could not see the cloth.  In Spielberg's version, everyone was vain, jealous or condemning of the Emperor and did not tell the Emperor for their own, selfish reasons.

       In Spielberg's version the 'swindlers' were now called 'weavers' and one was a man and the other a woman.  They did not come to town, as Andersen's story states, to get some money out of the Emperor but came to town because the resentful Prime Minister sought them out while they were in jail for theft to hire them for the deception.  It states, "The weavers began their presentation with lots of attitude, explaining that material of such a fine and rare nature could only be seen by visionaries gifted with true taste and imagination."

       The physician said, "Ach, the people in this Empire are dummkopfs.  They whine of aches and pains but they are as healthy as the oxen that pulled my father's plow back in Frankfurt."  She refers to the Emperor with "Herr Emperor!" and the Empress, which was not in the original story, speaks French words and is translated into English with the comment, "For those who have been spared the rigors of intelligence, that's French for 'I'm the Empress.'"  She also walked naked in the procession along with her husband.

       The loom of Andersen's story that was a loom only, now talks in Spielberg's movie as the Spinning Wheel and calls itself the 'Wheel of Fortune.'  There are several comparisons to other modern phrases such as when the Ladies in Waiting, jealous as they were that the Empress married the Emperor, refer to her as 'airhead, her royal bananahead, imperial nitwit, noble dummy, birdbrain boss, dingbat and loopiness.'  None of these insults were used in Andersen's story.

       In the movie, the Jester's talent is passing his "gift of gas" from his "musical behind" for the amusement of the Court.  The Wizard is so deep that no one understands a word he says, which is similar to Alan Greenspan's comment that he used double speak, or Fed Speak as he called it, when giving his speeches on the economy.

       Sprinkled into the movie version of the book, are bits of 'wisdom' such as the mirror that is perfect and shows the Emperor the truth, but he did not listen.  The Honest Boy is a good example of this when he kicks his mother and whispers to her that the Emperor had no clothes on and she told him, "Shut up, already!"  The Boy makes his way to the front of the crowd and YELLS it out.

       The most striking difference between the book and the movie, however, is the ending.  In Andersen's book, the vain Emperor heard that the 'swindlers' could make this magical cloth and he decided he would wear it for the next great celebration.  In Spielberg's version, it was the Emperor's birthday.  Perhaps this was done so that he could use phrases like 'birthday suit' for humor.  In Andersen's book after the boy said, 'But he doesn't have anything on!' to his father, the Emperor realized there really was no cloth, yet he continued proudly walking in the procession until it was over.

       In the movie, the Imperial General sprang into action and contrived a story for the Emperor by congratulating him "on his successful plan to uncover evil influences in the government!" and turn the tables on the Prime Minister and the weavers by exposing himself.  Then the Emperor made the Honest Boy prime minister who then spoke to the crowd, "Yes, honesty's always the best policy:  Tell the whole naked truth when you see what you see.  But I'd never have learned that, I surely suppose, if I hadn't been wearing the Emperor's New Clothes."

       Yes, this is a Jewish version of Hans Christian Andersen's kind and simple story and most of the " star-studded cast " in the movie were indeed Jewish but I believe the strongest message is at the end of the movie when the moth says it all:  "Tell your parents to get rid of those moth balls and cedar chips and who knows?  Maybe I'll wing by for a visit..."

__._,_.___

Attachment(s) from ReporterNotebook

1 of 1 File(s)

Beward_of_the_Weavers_2010.doc

Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic

Messages in this topic (1)

Recent Activity:

Visit Your Group

MARKETPLACE

Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.

---

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.

---

Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.

Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use

.

__,_._,___

Bernhard Frank, + Himmler's daughter

 

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3995490,00.html

11:57 , 12.07.10

Print Nazi Sercrets Exposed Bernhard Frank. Signed order calling to kill thousands of Jews  click here to enlarge text				SS officer admits signing extermination order  For 65 years Bernhard Frank hid chilling past, including signing first order instructing Jewish genocide and close ties with Hitler, Himmler. Personal interviews with US Jew disguised as Neo-Nazi reveal dark secrets leading to upcoming lawsuit Eldad Beck  BERLIN - He was a senior assistant to SS and Gestapo Commander Heinrich Himmler, and befriended Adolf Hitler as well. He was responsible for signing the first order of the Reich instructing the mass murder of hundreds of thousands of Jews, later turning into the Nazi systematic extermination machine. No Justice? Himmler's daughter helps Nazi escape justice / Ynet As member of Nazi charity, SS chief's daughter tries to prevent Klaas Faber's extradition to Holland Full Story   But for the past 65 years since the end of World War II, Dr. Bernhard Frank managed to hide his direct involvement with the Jewish genocide, walking around freely in Germany and never being prosecuted for his actions.   Now, at the age of 97, he is being exposed for the first time by an American Jew who pretended to be a neo-Nazi.   In the upcoming days a lawsuit is expected to be filed in the United States against Frank, the most senior Nazi criminal still alive today. The suit, which will probably also call for his extradition, will be filed on behalf of US citizens whose families were murdered during WWII as part of the cruel order signed by Frank. The suit claims he is responsible for genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity.   One of the prosecutors, a young 43-year-old American Jew by the name of Mark Gould, was actually the one who managed to expose Frank's past. In a special Yedioth Ahronoth interview Gould talks about how he was able to connect the puzzle pieces and uncover the chilling past of an old Nazi criminal.   Secrets Uncovered Gould took advantage of his Aryan looks – tall, blond hair, blue eyes – in order to get close to the Nazi officer. He impersonated a neo-Nazi and met with Frank over the years, interviewing him for long hours at a time, sometimes documenting the meeting on video. This material is likely to serve as legal evidence against Frank during the trial.   Over time, the two developed a trusting relationship, and Frank began to confess to Gould about his SS past.   Frank was responsible for the Nazi language code used by the SS to disguise the 'special treatment' given to Jews during the German occupation of USSR territories. He was also one of the senior officers in charge of consolidating and distributing the racist Nazi ideology.   Frank was selected by Himmler to serve in a special commando unit responsible for SS operations in occupied USSR territories in the summer of 1941. As part of his new position, as Himmler's senior assistant, he was personally responsible for signing the July 28 1941 order called "Comando Stadt Order". This was the first actual SS order instructing to kill hundreds of thousands of Jews, including women and children, preceding the Commissar order. It was the first stage of the massive Jewish extermination process.   At the time, Frank was instructed by Himmler to keep an SS war journal, gathering all reports of SS activities, including the Jewish genocide.    Hiter's personal order In 1943, Frank was appointed head of security at the SS base of Obersalzberg, the beloved mountain residence of Adolf Hitler located in southern Germany.   It was then that Frank was given a personal order by Hitler to kill Hermann Göring, a high ranking Nazi officer who announced his intention to take over the German leadership, due to Russia's closure of Hitler's bunker in Berlin. Frank refused to go through with it, but he did arrest him for treason.   Frank later signed Obersalzberg's surrender letter to the US, hoping he could prevent its complete destruction.   Over the years he wrote books about his service in the SS and gave television interviews, but always made sure to hide any information regarding his SS service under Himmler.   Loved by Himmler During one of his long interviews with Gould, Frank said he and Himmler had a great relationship and that the latter loved him very much. Frank went on to say that the SS commander was a "good man."   Frank told Gould that when he was young he had Jewish friends, but that the political events at the time forced him to cut ties with them. He claimed that the Jews played a major role in German oppression and "dug their own graves." Frank added that the war was the outcome of decision made by governments, and the Nazis were only fulfilling their duties.   When the relationship between the two grew stronger, Gould confronted Frank with the extermination orders he had signed. After short hesitation, Frank admitted the signature on the documents was, in fact, his, but claimed he had only approved the linguistic content.   "He defended himself, saying the order was necessary, because Jews in those areas were involved in guerilla warfare against Germans," said Gould in an exclusive Yedioth Ahronoth interview. "In retrospect, we are talking about the first act of genocide by the SS. It was before the trains began making their way to extermination camps. It was also the first actual mass murder test run. The command wanted to see if SS soldiers would murder Jewish citizens, including women, children and elders. Frank was responsible for wording the orders in such a way that the troops on location, especially those who had undergone ideological training, could understand what do to. It was written in the spirit of Reinhard Heydrich (a high-ranking SS official, the first to be in charge of the 'Final Solution' operation)."   A rifle by his side "Frank justified the orders, claiming they were given during the war, when there were a lot of partisan Jews, outlaws and robbers," added Gould. "When asked if the women and children murdered were also partisans and robbers, he shrugged his shoulders and didn't respond. I caught him lying a lot during the interviews. He admitted to some of the lies. Eventually he let me do anything I wanted with the materials. A rifle was by his side during many interviews, so he could have shot me if he wanted to. When I confronted him I feared what he might do to me or to himself. But my impression was that Frank wished to receive recognition for all the things he had done while serving in the SS. He hid it for so many decades. He was very proud of his actions and the fact that I was able to expose what he had done made him appreciate me. He gave me all the material which could convict him, including private journals, love letters and other documents he had written."   Gould arrived at Frank's house in Frankfurt last weekend to personally deliver the lawsuit against him. Frank's spouse attacked Gould and he needed to get medical attention at a nearby hospital.   "A civil lawsuit filed against Frank in the US will allow us to make sure a man doesn't get away with crimes he had committed and not dodge the punishment," said the prosecutor, Attorney Nitzana Darshan-Leitner. "Even after his death, the lawsuit will continue for his inheritance and his family will have to pay the price."   Follow Ynetnews on Facebook             Back

 

--

Being happy–is it good for the Jews? "Before Professor Dershowitz accused me of being an anti-Semite (news to me), I was a happy person. Since then, I'm still a happy person". –Michael Santomauro

An antisemite condemns people for being Jews, I am not an antisemite.--Michael Santomauro

Most of us are mentally trapped to think Jewish. Actually, it is safe to say that virtually every mainstream publication or or other type of media organ is "nothing more than a screen to present chosen views." The great battle over the last century has been a battle for the mind of the Western peoples, i.e., non-Jewish Euros. The chosen won it by acquiring control over essentially the complete mainstream news, information, education and entertainment media of every type, and using that control to infuse and disseminate their message, agenda and worldview, their way of thinking, or rather the way they want us to think. Since at least the 1960s this campaign has been effectively complete. Since then they have shaped and controlled the minds of all but a seeming few of us in varying degree with almost no opposition or competition from any alternative worldview. So now most of us are mentally trapped in the box the chosen have made for us, which we have lived in all our lives. Only a few have managed to avoid it or escape it, or to even sometimes see outside of it, and so actually "think outside of the (Jewish) box." --Michael Santomauro

Thank you and remember: 

Peace is patriotic!

Michael Santomauro

253 W. 72nd Street

New York, NY 10023

Call anytime: 917-974-6367

E-mail me anything:

ReporterNotebook@Gmail.com

__._,_.___

Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic

Messages in this topic (1)

Recent Activity:

Visit Your Group

Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use

.

__,_._,___

Send a Christmas card to Zundel

 

>
> ****
>
> SEND A CHRISTMAS CARD TO ERNST ZUNDEL - LET HIM KNOW YOU CARE!
>
> by Michael Hoffman | Dec. 7, 2010 | www.revisionisthistory.org
>
> On March 1, 2010 prisoner of conscience Ernst Zundel was released from
> Mannheim prison in Germany, after having served seven years, some of it
> in solitary confinement in jails and prisons in the U.S., Canada and
> Germany.
>
> The wicked crime that led to his imprisonment? He doubts the stories
> about the homicidal gas chambers of World War II Germany.
>
> For that thought "crime," he lost seven years of his life. Now 71, Mr.
> Zundel resides in Germany in his family's ancestral home.
>
> The real crime here, the crime against Ernst's human rights as a
> dissident is not an issue for the White House, the European Union, the
> U.N. or the New York Times. They were all content to watch a heretic
> lose his freedom and rot in jail for doubting Holocaustianity, the last
> truly believed religion in the otherwise agnostic West.
>
> We live in a world which has witnessed the strategic capture of the
> language of human rights by the partisans of Israeli Zionism and
> Talmudic Judaism. The resulting partisanship has blinded western
> intellectuals, churchmen and activists to the intellectual dishonesty of
> jailing dissidents and criminalizing doubts about 65-year-old Judaic and
> Allied dogmas.
>
> We in the West are free to doubt every once-sacred tenet of
> Christianity. We can laugh at Christ's miracles and deny His
> resurrection, but in Europe, Australia and Canada to do the same to the
> miracle stories and relics of Holocaustianity is a one-way ticket to
> media defamation, loss of employment, crippling fines and even
> imprisonment.
>
> In the U.S., according to the Vassar college newspaper, this year
> Deborah Lipstadt announced that she intends to make the "denial" of
> execution gas chambers "socially unforgivable" in America. Who appointed
> this lady commissar of social life in America?
>
> Ernst Zundel could have recanted; he could have cut a deal and who would
> have blamed him? Instead, he sat for years, alone, in a freezing dungeon
> in Canada, labeled a "national security threat." Then he was keelhauled
> to his native Germany, where the German judges and prosecutors who sell
> their inheritance for a bowl of Zionist-media approbation, sentenced him
> to several more years of imprisonment.
>
> On March 1, when the dungeon doors finally opened, Ernst was
> photographed smiling!
>
> The typical Christmas card of average-sized dimensions weighs one ounce
> and costs 98 cents air mail postage to Germany. (Larger or heavier cards
> will require additional postage).
>
> If you think this man merits your recognition and acknowledgement, let
> him know!
>
> Mr. Ernst Zundel
> Richard Wagner Str. 64
> 75313 Bad Wildbad
> Germany
>
>
>

__._,_.___

Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic

Messages in this topic (1)

Recent Activity:

Visit Your Group

Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use

.

__,_._,___

ROBERT FAURISSON: The Nuremberg trial (1945-1946) is the crime of crimes

 

Subject: ROBERT FAURISSON: The Nuremberg trial (1945-1946) is the crime of crimes

World-changing stuff, if spread about.

http://robertfaurisson.blogspot.com/2010/11/nuremberg-trial-1945-1946-is-crime-of.html

__._,_.___

Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic

Messages in this topic (1)

Recent Activity:

Visit Your Group

Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use

.

__,_._,___

New guidelines add protection for USA Jewish students

 

http://m.jta.org/news/article/jta/2010/10/26/2741452/new-guidelines-will-protect-jewish-students

Updated 02:40 PM EDT 10.26.10

New guidelines add protection for Jewish students

(JTA) -- New federal anti-bullying guidelines for U.S. educators will increase the protection of Jewish students from anti-Semitism.

Secretary of Education Arne Duncan issued a letter Tuesday that in effect applies Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to the protection of Jewish students from anti-Semitism on campuses. Title VI prohibits discrimination based on "race, color or national origin" but does not include religion.

Under the Department of Education guidelines, the Civil Rights Act can be invoked if anti-Jewish behavior is considered to be based on shared ethnic characteristics.

U.S. Rep. Brad Sherman (D-Calif.) and Sen. Arlen Specter (D-Pa.) introduced legislation last month that would amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964, whose Title VI prohibits discrimination based on "race, color, or national origin" to also include religion. The Zionist Organization of America also has led efforts to bring about legislative changes to Title VI, including lobbying members of Congress.

In a statement following the release of the guidelines, Sherman said that "The policy is now clear: colleges and universities will no longer be permitted to turn a blind eye when Jewish students face severe and persistent anti-Semitic hostility on their campuses. The schools will now be compelled to respond."

The Department of Education also announced that it would use Title IX of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of gender, to protect lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) students, and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act to protect students with disabilities from harassment on campus. 
 

• 
 
• 
 
• 
 
• 
 
• 
 
• 
 
• 

Peace.

Michael Santomauro 

@ 917-974-6367 

What sort of TRUTH is it that crushes the freedom to seek the truth?

__._,_.___

Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic

Messages in this topic (1)

Recent Activity:

Visit Your Group

MARKETPLACE

Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.

---

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.

---

Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.

Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use

.

__,_._,___

Please Donate to Bradley Smith and NOT to Mark Weber

 

From: Bradley Smith / Codoh <bradley1930@yahoo.com>
Date: December 7, 2010 6:25:07 PM EST

Having trouble viewing this email? Click here

Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust I got a lot of funny looks some thirty years ago when I first started talking to people about Holocaust revisionism and the taboo that says you are not supposed to talk about it. Let's just say some people were skeptical of the notion that it needed to be talked about, others that it should be talked about in only one way. For me, there was a simple purpose in talking about it. To share new scholarship in every direction that was good news for Jews and for Germans alike. No hope for riches. No political agenda. No strings attached. Two decades after founding CODOH there are some 800,000 references to Denial and Revisionism in the New Media, the World Wide Web. Soon to be a million-for starters. CODOH isn't anything like a commercial website. It is a community creation maintained, edited, and largely written by volunteers, risking everything including bankruptcy, social condemnation, and in Europe and Israel, imprisonment. You are most likely a part of this community. I am writing today to ask you to protect and sustain CODOH. Together we will keep it free of charge and free of advertising. We can keep it open-you can use the information in CODOH any way you want. We can keep it growing-spreading intellectual freedom everywhere, inviting participation from everyone. Each year at this time we reach out to ask you and others all across the CODOH community to help sustain our joint enterprise with a modest, or magnificent, donation-whatever is right for you. If you value CODOH as a source of information-and a source of inspiration-I hope you will choose to act right now. All the best (with a tip of the hat to Jimmy Wales), Bradley Smith CODOH Founder DONATIONS

__._,_.___

Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic

Messages in this topic (1)

Recent Activity:

Visit Your Group

MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.

---

Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.

---

Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.

Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use

.

__,_._,___

Classic book - “The Great Holocaust Trial” - now back in print!

Classic book - "The Great Holocaust Trial" - now back in print!

Out of print since 1995!

Announcing a new edition of Michael Hoffman's classic work:

THE GREAT HOLOCAUST TRIAL

The Landmark Battle for the Right to Doubt the West's Most Sacred Relic

With new material added

A great educational tool!

The record of the persecution of German-Canadian heretic Ernst Zundel by a de facto Sanhedrin, for publishing the book, Did Six Million Really Die? is almost too fantastic to countenance. Zundel faced two years in prison if convicted. His defense was initially regarded by the press and public as preposterous. "How can anyone deny the Holocaust?" was the incredulous response to the news that Zundel would vigorously defend himself and the free speech rights of all Canadians. The trial was expected to be a quick and ignominious rout of Zundel and his supporters. But in a startling reversal, the "survivors" who had appeared in court in order to send him to jail, had to submit their "testimony" to scrutiny, the rules of evidence and cross-examination, something that had never happened before and has never happened since. 

Canadians grew ever more surprised and shocked at the amazing admissions which the defense team elicited from the supposed "eyewitnesses" to the homicidal gas chambers. As a result, television reporters and print journalists who covered the trial for more than eight weeks in 1985 produced broadcasts and news reports that turned Canada upside down. 

The Great Holocaust Trial is the only revisionist account of Ernst Zundel's first trial, one of the few times in history when so-called "Holocaust survivors" were subjected to cross-examination by a counsel for the defense as astute, fearless and well-informed as Douglas Christie. 

The first trial also pitted Dr. Raul Hilberg, who provided "expert historical" testimony intended to send Zundel to prison, against the learned Dr. Robert Faurisson, adviser to defense attorney Christie. It is not an exaggeration to say that, guided by Faurisson's knowledge and the researchers from around the world who aided this French scholar, Mr. Christie's cross-examination demolished the credibility of an academic who, at the time, was considered the world's leading authority on "The Holocaust" and the chemical "killing chambers" of Auschwitz-Birkenau. 

In 1995 Hoffman expanded the book to include an account of the second trial of 1988, when Ernst Zundel produced the Leutcher Report, an unprecedented, on-site forensic examination of Auschwitz by "Mr. Death" - Fred Leutcher - the U.S. prison system's own capital punishment engineer. 

In addition to Hoffman's new introductory essay, "There Should be no Talmudic Hierarchy of Victimhood," this 2010 edition contains an aftermath chronology which updates the reader on major occurrences in revisonism since 1995, including Mr. Zundel's lengthy imprisonment in Canada and Germany. It also includes two appendices: the first by Fred A. Leutcher Jr.; the second concerning a documentary film about Mr. Leutcher made by Errol Morris. 

For several years revisionist colleagues have urged us to bring this important history back into print, and thanks to donations from dedicated truth-seekers, we are gratified to have accomplished this objective, twenty-five years after the first trial, as testimony to a flame that will not die, even in the darkest penal hole.

TABLE OF CONTENTS: Hoffman's Preface to the Twenty-Fifth Anniversary (Fourth) Edition: "There Should be no Talmudic Hierarchy of Victimhood"; Preface to the Third Edition; The Great Holocaust Trial (1985): Genesis; Inquisition; The Image; The Relentless Crusade. The Second Great Holocaust Trial (1988): The Context. Aftermath 1995-2010. Appendix I: The Ordeal of Fred Leutcher. Appendix II: Two Views of the film, "Mr. Death"; Bibliography and reference resources

ORDERING INFORMATION

The Great Holocaust Trial: The Landmark Battle for the Right to Doubt the West's Most Sacred Relic

Illustrated with rare photos and newspaper clippings. 

Large size, 7 x 10 quality paperback. 182 pages. 

This book is not available through our online store. You can purchase it by mail with a US Check, US Money Order, International Postal Money Order or VISA or Mastercard (include your name, the account number, expiration date and the last three numbers on the back of the card).

Please note: prices are different for each region

U.S. CUSTOMERS send $19.95 plus $3.50 shipping for the first book and $1.00 shipping for each additional copy. Wholesale: 3 copies for $55 postpaid in the U.S. Ten copies for $165 postpaid in the U.S. (the Wholesale price is not available outside the U.S.) Idaho residents add 6% tax.

CANADIANS send $19.95 plus $8.00 shipping for the first book and $4.00 shipping for each additional copy. (We cannot be held responsible for seizures of the book by Canadian Customs).

OVERSEAS customers send $19.95 plus $11.00 shipping for the first book and $6.00 shipping each additional copy.

Order from: Independent History and Research, Box 849, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83816 USA

Send a Christmas card to Ernst Zundel - Let him know you care!

by Michael Hoffman 

On March 1, 2010 prisoner of conscience Ernst Zundel was released from Mannheim prison in Germany, after having served seven years, some of it in solitary confinement in jails and prisons in the U.S., Canada and Germany.

The wicked crime that led to his imprisonment? He doubts the stories about the homicidal gas chambers of World War II Germany.

For that thought "crime," he lost seven years of his life. Now 71, Mr. Zundel resides in Germany in his family's ancestral home.

The real crime here, the crime against Ernst's human rights as a dissident is not an issue for the White House, the European Union, the U.N. or the New York Times. They were all content to watch a heretic lose his freedom and rot in jail for doubting Holocaustianity, the last truly believed religion in the otherwise agnostic West.

We live in a world which has witnessed the strategic capture of the language of human rights by the partisans of Israeli Zionism and Talmudic Judaism. The resulting partisanship has blinded western intellectuals, churchmen and activists to the intellectual dishonesty of jailing dissidents and criminalizing doubts about 65-year-old Judaic and Allied dogmas.

We in the West are free to doubt every once-sacred tenet of Christianity. We can laugh at Christ's miracles and deny His resurrection, but in Europe, Australia and Canada to do the same to the miracle stories and relics of Holocaustianity is a one-way ticket to media defamation, loss of employment, crippling fines and even imprisonment. In the U.S., according to the Vassar college newspaper, this year Deborah Lipstadt announced that she intends to make the "denial" of execution gas chambers "socially unforgivable" in America. Who appointed this lady commissar of social life in America?

Ernst Zundel could have recanted; he could have cut a deal and who would have blamed him? Instead, he sat for years, alone, in a freezing dungeon in Canada, labeled a "national security threat." Then he was keelhauled to his native Germany, where the German judges and prosecutors who sell their inheritance for a bowl of Zionist-media approbation, sentenced him to several more years of imprisonment.

On March 1, when the dungeon doors finally opened, Ernst was photographed smiling!

The typical Christmas card of average-sized dimensions weighs one ounce and costs 98 cents air mail postage to Germany. (Larger or heavier cards will require additional postage).

If you think this man merits your recognition and acknowledgement, let him know!

Mr. Ernst Zundel 

Richard Wagner Str. 64 
75313 Bad Wildbad 
Germany

(Hoffman is the author of The Great Holocaust Trial: The Landmark Battle for the Right to Doubt the West's Most Sacred Relic, which was published this month by Independent History and Research).