Dec 15, 2016
Nov 28, 2016
Nov 8, 2016
Nov 7, 2016
Nov 6, 2016
Nov 5, 2016
Oct 28, 2016
Blockbuster Audio From 2006 Of Hillary Clinton Proposing Rigging Palesti...
What's a little election rigging?
“I do not think we should have pushed for an election in the Palestinian territories. I think that was a big mistake,” said Sen. Clinton. “And if we were going to push for an election, then we should have made sure that we did something to determine who was going to win.”
-Hillary R. Clinton
Jul 11, 2016
Jul 3, 2016
Jun 29, 2016
Jun 16, 2016
Jun 14, 2016
Jun 6, 2016
When I Met Muhammad Ali
June 6, 2016
When I met Muhammad Ali
by Michael Santomauro
Back in the year 1978-1979, I was a travel agent for some of Muhammad Ali's flights on the Concorde from New York to London.
I was 19 years old and Muhammad Ali was one of my idols.
I asked to deliver the ticket instead of our new messenger for the office.
When I got to Muhammad Ali's location, I was immediately escorted to the conference room by a Cuban woman with a stunning hour glass figure.
The doorway was extra wide for the two of us to be standing side by side as she interrupted the business meeting:
"Mr. Ali, there is someone who would like your autograph."
He looks at me and looks at her. Repeats the shifting of his head back to her then to me. Keeps doing this for about 30 seconds and there is total confusion in the room. He finally stops shifting his head and screams at me:
"You're so ugly!"
I was devasted. Everyone was staring at me for my reaction--a very tense moment--then Muhammad Ali waives me over and says " I was just joking " then everyone starts to laugh. While shaking his hand, I was amazed it was more than twice the size of mine.
Mr. Ali RIP you will be missed.
Peace.
Michael Santomauro
June 6, 2016
When I met Muhammad Ali
by Michael Santomauro
Back in the year 1978-1979, I was a travel agent for some of Muhammad Ali's flights on the Concorde from New York to London.
I was 19 years old and Muhammad Ali was one of my idols.
I asked to deliver the ticket instead of our new messenger for the office.
When I got to Muhammad Ali's location, I was immediately escorted to the conference room by a Cuban woman with a stunning hour glass figure.
The doorway was extra wide for the two of us to be standing side by side as she interrupted the business meeting:
"Mr. Ali, there is someone who would like your autograph."
He looks at me and looks at her. Repeats the shifting of his head back to her then to me. Keeps doing this for about 30 seconds and there is total confusion in the room. He finally stops shifting his head and screams at me:
"You're so ugly!"
I was devasted. Everyone was staring at me for my reaction--a very tense moment--then Muhammad Ali waives me over and says " I was just joking " then everyone starts to laugh. While shaking his hand, I was amazed it was more than twice the size of mine.
Mr. Ali RIP you will be missed.
Peace.
Michael Santomauro
Jun 4, 2016
May 26, 2016
Apr 27, 2016
Apr 18, 2016
Apr 17, 2016
Apr 9, 2016
Mar 30, 2016
Mar 23, 2016
Hey Brussels: It’s Fun to Fight Wars for the Jews, Isn’t It?
Hey Brussels: It’s Fun to Fight Wars for the Jews, Isn’t It?
Thomas Dalton
Mar 22, 2016
Thomas Dalton
Mar 22, 2016
Earlier today there was a series of attacks in Brussels. It involved two or three explosions, at the airport and a metro station, killing some 30 people, according to initial reports. The Belgian news agency Belga reported that there were “shouts in Arabic” just before the explosions. ISIS has allegedly “claimed responsibility.”
Obviously it is too soon to know many of the details, but even now, we can be certain that this was one of two possibilities: (1) an attack by actual Arabs or Muslims, or (2) a false-flag operation by Zionists or Jews, and made to appear as a Muslim attack. Either way, the Jews had a hand in it. Either way, Europeans have once again fallen victim to Jewish deceit.
In the first case, if it were an actual attack by Muslims or Arabs, they would be fully justified in doing so. The United States and NATO have been leading a murderous assault against Arab and Muslim nations for years. NATO, with its headquarters in Brussels, has been killing people in Afghanistan for 15 years now, ever since 9/11. And it was NATO action that destroyed Libya in 2011, turning that nation into chaos. For over a year, Belgium was an active member in the Combined Joint Task Force fighting ISIS in Iraq and Syria. And Belgium has done little to sanction the criminal apartheid regime in Israel.
In effect, Belgium has been meekly following along with the Jewish/Zionist line: attack Arabs and Muslims ruthlessly, in their home nations, for no reason other than that they pose a theoretical threat to Israel. Seeing Arabs and Muslims as their only real competition, and holding a three-millennia attitude of racial superiority over them, Jews would like nothing more than to make the whole world hate them as much as they do. But neither Europeans nor Americans have any intrinsic reason to be enemies of Islam. In fact, precisely the opposite: Muslim and Arab nations have the oil resources that the West badly needs. Rationally speaking, we should strive to be on the best possible terms with these nations. Instead, we send our warplanes and killer drones to assault them ruthlessly. And then we are shocked when they strike back in the only way they can—with ‘terrorist’ attacks and suicide bombers.
If, on the other hand, it were some Jewish-led (Israeli or Mossad) operation to incite hatred against Muslims and foment terror generally, as was likely the case in both Paris attacks, then the Jews are directly to blame. We must keep in mind that Jews have a two-fold mission in Europe: to flood the continent with Arabs in order to sow turmoil and racial hatred, and to get Europeans to play an active role in slaughtering them in the Middle East, North Africa, and elsewhere around the world. And they are succeeding on both fronts. These actions are in turn part of a broader strategy of exploiting European society, milking it for Holocaust reparations, and in the end reducing it to the level of the Third World.
We must realize the strength of the Jewish Lobby in Belgium. That country has, proportionately, one of the largest Jewish contingencies in Europe. At present, there are about 30,000 Jews in Belgium. Though this represents just 0.3% of the nation—and is dwarfed by the 650,000 Muslims there—Belgian Jews are able to steer foreign policy in their favor. On a percentage basis, only France (0.7%) and the UK (0.5%) have more Jews, among West European nations. As everywhere, Jewish strength is not in numbers, but in wealth and influence. Their organization there is considerable: the Belgian League against Anti-Semitism, the Belgian branch of the European Jewish Association, the CCOJB, the European Jewish Congress, Radio Judaica, the CCIB, and so on. Through such organizations internally, and thanks to Jewish pressure externally, Belgium repeatedly yields to Jewish demands. They fight wars against Muslims. They pay $170 million in Holocaust reparations, as recently as 2008. They pass laws against questioning the Holocaust. They refuse to sanction Israel in the UN. They continue to do business with the racist apartheid state.
Belgium, then, just like Germany, France, the UK, and most of Europe, is effectively what the Nazis called a Judenknecht—a slave to the Jews. They follow the Jewish line, yield to Jewish demands, allow them to dominate their government, and fight their wars. Now they are paying the price.
The solution is clear, and involves several steps. First, drive out all combatants. The age-old war of Jews against Arabs has moved to the streets of Europe, and if Europe wants to restore order, they must expel the fighters. In other words, drive out the Arabs, and drive out the Jews. Belgium’s considerable Arab minority—primarily Moroccans and Turks—should be given six months to depart peacefully, or face deportation. Unlike in the US, these people are not Belgian citizens. Most of them have no legal right to even stay in the country. And yet the government simply looks the other way, thanks to Jewish pressure. Recall: Jews want to see Muslims in Europe. They tolerate a Muslim presence in their midst because they think it will make the public hostile to Islam, and in any case will degrade society generally. Once Europe is thoroughly wrecked, the Jews can always jump ship, just as they have done for centuries. For their part, the Jews seem like they are ready to leave anyway, so Belgium and the other nations should give them a ‘helping hand’ right out the door.
Second, stop serving as a slave to the Jews. Stop killing Arabs and Muslims in faraway lands that pose no threat to Belgium or Europe. Sanction fully and completely the criminal regime in Israel. Use the power of the UN to bring the Jewish State to its knees.
Third, expose all aspects of Jewish power. Identify and sanction powerful individual Jews. Block them out of business activity, or tax them out of existence. Close down the many, powerful Jewish organizations that only serve to promote Jewish power. Ultimately, drive them out.
Fourth, allow open and honest discussion about Jewish power, the Holocaust, and the global Jewish Lobby. End the embarrassing laws proscribing ‘Holocaust denial.’ Regain some dignity and stand up to the criminal Jewish Lobby in all its manifestations.
Sooner or later, the European public will wake up. Sooner or later, they will realize that, for centuries, Jews have stirred up trouble, incited wars and revolutions, turned nation against nation and friend against friend, simply for profit and power. There is good reason why Joseph Goebbels called them “the incarnation of evil,” “plastic demons of decay,” and “bearers of an international culture-destroying chaos.” He was simply recalling history—a history that has been covered up and distorted beyond recognition. In their alternate universe, Jews are always and everywhere the innocent victims of hateful oppression. Peacefully minding their own business, they are good, law-abiding citizens. They promote tolerance, liberality, and progress. Posing no threat to anyone, they are humble and innocent lambs. And yet, as Nietzsche recognized more than a century ago, “When Jews step forward as innocence itself, then the danger is great.”
Indeed—the danger is great. The Palestinians have known this for over 70 years. The Lebanese, Syrians, Iraqis and Iranians for much longer. And the Europeans are now finding this out. May they have the strength and the fortitude to take action, to defend themselves, and to restore civility to their nations.
________________________________
Thomas Dalton, PhD, is the author of Debating the Holocaust (2nd ed, 2015), and numerous articles related to the above topic. See, for example, his on-line essays “Eternal Strangers,” “The Jewish Hand in the World Wars,” and “The Great Holocaust Mystery.”
Thomas Dalton, PhD, is the author of Debating the Holocaust (2nd ed, 2015), and numerous articles related to the above topic. See, for example, his on-line essays “Eternal Strangers,” “The Jewish Hand in the World Wars,” and “The Great Holocaust Mystery.”
Mar 13, 2016
Mar 11, 2016
Mar 10, 2016
Mar 1, 2016
The only thing that holds America together is material prosperity.
Dear Friend,
The only thing that holds America together is material prosperity.
Basically the country is not a nation at all but a federation of antagonistic racial, ethnic and financial groups.
The money is beginning to run out. The standard of living has been declining for the past 30 years but it hasn't been a drastic or universal decline. Americans are by nature optimistic so millions of them have gone on believing that their standard of living will go up again.
But it is beginning to dawn on the "sheep", that it's not going to get better.
If Americans in general ever come to believe that the good times are over, the country will erupt into an explosion of racial, ethnic and class hatreds that may make Bosnia look like child's play.
Peace.
Michael Santomauro
Cell: 917-974-6367
+TWITTER: http://twitter.com/#!/Santomauro
The only thing that holds America together is material prosperity.
Basically the country is not a nation at all but a federation of antagonistic racial, ethnic and financial groups.
The money is beginning to run out. The standard of living has been declining for the past 30 years but it hasn't been a drastic or universal decline. Americans are by nature optimistic so millions of them have gone on believing that their standard of living will go up again.
But it is beginning to dawn on the "sheep", that it's not going to get better.
If Americans in general ever come to believe that the good times are over, the country will erupt into an explosion of racial, ethnic and class hatreds that may make Bosnia look like child's play.
Peace.
Michael Santomauro
Cell: 917-974-6367
+TWITTER: http://twitter.com/#!/Santomauro
no plus ones
... they came for the iPhone users, and I did not speak out—
... they came for the iPhone users, and I did not speak out—
First they came for the Holocaust Revisionists, and I did speak
out---Because I am not a Holocaust Revisionist.
Then they came for the Bloggers , and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Blogger.
Then they came for the Facebook users, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Facebook user.
Then they came for the iPhone users, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a iPhone user.
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
Peace.
Michael Santomauro
917-974-6367
Feb 25, 2016
Feb 24, 2016
"Only Bradley Smith Can Make God a Holocaust Revisionist."
Smith was born exactly 86 years before he died on his birthday, on February 18th, 1930-2016.
Bradley Smith will always be remembered as a man of integrity, worthy of the highest form of love--TRUST.
My Memory of Bradley Smith from Michael Santomauro, Febuary 24, 2016
I would spend 1-3 hours of intense phone conversations with him, the last time I spoke to him was last month in January and I wanted to wish him an early happy birthday the day before his death on his 86th birthday. I could not because I had a bad Internet connection with my iPhone---Bradley forgive me.
Last month's January phone call was the shortest phone conversation we ever had. He felt weak--but his mind and wit was still sharp. Bradley you were a man with tremendous guts and intelligence.
Bradley Smith was blessed with extra abilities. He was in touch with your sense of intuition or compassion able to see things others can't or create projects others don't dream of. Bradley you did it with class.
I told him in my last phone call with him something I never told him before. That he was the first revisionist I ever heard on the airwaves. It was late at night around midnight some time in the late 1980s I was laying on my futon in my New York City apartment in Manhattan; he was on the Barry Farber radio talk show. I told Bradley how I thought he was a kook questioning the Holocaust. He got humored by the story. Bradley, that is how I thought at the time.
But, the Jewish host of the show was receptive and fair to Bradley which shocked my brain that the very ethnocentric Jew Barry Farber, was open-minded to revisionism. I could not believe my ears how balanced Barry Farber was in interviewing him. Bradley, after the show I still thought you were a kook.
I continued to tell him, in my last phone call with him, that it was not till I got my first computer to navigate the World Wide Web, that I came across him again. That is when I was first exposed to serious Holocaust Revisionist literature. Bradley, because of your work on the Internet, you helped revolutionize my world.
I met Bradley in the year 2000, at an IHR conference. He inspired me, with confidence, to be a blogger on the World Wide Web. Bradley, thank you for teaching me not to compromise my integrity for anyone or anything.
Bradley, my last words to you, if there's a heaven, God will think you are a kook, but only someone of your caliber will make God a Holocaust Revisionist.
Thank you for letting me ride on your coat-tails while you were on earth, with the dozens of hours of the some of the most important conversations I've ever had.
Life will not be the same without you. I love you. Thank you for the memories. Your spirit is in me to continue blogging "inconvenient truths."
My Memory of Bradley Smith from Michael Santomauro, Febuary 24, 2016
Smith was born exactly 86 years before he died on his birthday, on February 18th, 1930-2016.My Memory of Bradley Smith from Michael Santomauro, Febuary 24, 2016Bradley Smith will always be remembered as a man of integrity, worthy of the highest form of love--TRUST.I would spend 1-3 hours of intense phone conversations with him, the last time I spoke to him was last month in January and I wanted to wish him an early happy birthday the day before his death on his 86th birthday. I could not because I had a bad Internet connection with my iPhone---Bradley forgive me.Last month's January phone call was the shortest phone conversation we ever had. He felt weak--but his mind and wit was still sharp. Bradley you were a man with tremendous guts and intelligence.Bradley Smith was blessed with extra abilities. He was in touch with your sense of intuition or compassion able to see things others can't or create projects others don't dream of. Bradley you did it with class.I told him in my last phone call with him something I never told him before. That he was the first revisionist I ever heard on the airwaves,. It was late at night around midnight some time in the late 1980s I was laying on my futon in my New York City apartment in Manhattan; he was on the Barry Farber radio talk show. I told Bradley how I thought he was a kook questioning the Holocaust. He got humored by the story. Bradley, that is how I thought at the time.But, the Jewish host of the show was receptive and fair to Bradley which shocked my brain that the very ethnocentric Jew Barry Farber, was open-minded to revisionism. I could not believe my ears how balanced Barry Farber was in interviewing him. Bradley, after the show I still thought you were a kook.I continued to tell him, in my last phone call with him, that it was not till I got my first computer to navigate the World Wide Web, that I came across him again. That is when I was first exposed to serious Holocaust Revisionist literature. Bradley, because of your work on the Internet, you helped revolutionize my world.I met Bradley in the year 2000, at an IHR conference. He inspired me, with confidence, to be a blogger on the World Wide Web. Bradley, thank you for teaching me not to compromise my integrity for anyone or anything.Bradley, my last words to you, if there's a heaven, God will think you are a kook, but only someone of your caliber will make God a Holocaust Revisionist.Thank you for letting me ride on your coat-tails while you were on earth, with the dozens of hours of the some of the most important conversations I've ever had.Life will not be the same without you. I love you. Thank you for the memories. Your spirit is in me to continue blogging "inconvenient truths."
Feb 23, 2016
Revisionist Bradley R. Smith Has Passed Away | Renegade Tribune
Revisionist Bradley R. Smith Has Passed Away | Renegade Tribune: The famous revisionist Bradley R. Smith is no longer with us. He started down the difficult road of exposing the lies of the 'Holocaust' in 1979 and never looked back.
Feb 22, 2016
Feb 10, 2016
I endorse Bernie Sanders for the nomination. --Michael Santomauro, 2/10/16
I endorse Bernie Sanders for the nomination. --Michael Santomauro, 2/10/16
Clinton Deploys B Team
By Dick Morris on February 10, 2016
Published on TheHill.Com on February 9, 2015Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign is falling apart. Bernie Sanders soared in New Hampshire and now two polls have him tying her nationally. It’s a disaster.Now she’s called in the B Team — the cynical, paranoid and wacky twins Sidney Blumenthal and David Brock — to bail her out. And here comes the elderly, diminished and livid former President Bill Clinton to lead the duo’s frantic attacks on Sanders.The attacks are rooted in nothing more than a list of dirty names they call the Vermont senator every day. Having found little in his record to attack, they have consulted the thesaurus to turn up ugly sounding accusations.Sanders has a coherent, consistent and concise message: Incomes are stagnant because the economy is rigged by the top one-tenth of 1 percent that controls politics through massive campaign contributions.Clinton has no competing message, just the charge that Sanders’s supporters are “sexist and vulgar.” Brock adds that one of Sanders’s ads was racist because it had too many white people in it.Their strategy is laughable. After losing 84 percent of young voters in Iowa — and failing to recover them in New Hampshire — they sent in two aging fossils of feminism to insult and threaten young women.The 81-year-old feminist Gloria Steinem charged that young women are only backing Sanders because that’s where they can meet boys. And 78-year-old Madeleine Albright threatened to consign to a “special place in hell” women who don’t back female candidates like Clinton.Those are two great ways to attract young voters.The aging and raging ex-president, meanwhile, speaking to a half-filled gym in a New Hampshire school, ranted about Sanders’s “hypocrisy” in condemning his wife’s paid speeches. Sanders, too, has given paid speeches, Bill Clinton claimed.He’s got a point. In 2013, for example, Sanders made all of $1,500, which he donated to charity as required by federal law. In 2014, he raked in $1,850 for paid speeches. By contrast, Clinton made, and kept, over $21 million during the same time period. Sanders was only reimbursed for coach class airfare, while Clinton demanded private jets. Sanders’s hosts were the TV show “Real Time with Bill Maher,” Avalon Publishing and a machinists union. Clinton’s were Goldman Sachs, the big banks and the pharmaceutical and energy industries. What hypocrisy for Sanders to use that as an issue!Both Brock and Blumenthal share the former first lady’s enthusiasm for discussing the “vast right-wing conspiracy” in America. Now that they’ve been outed as being back on her team, it’s easy to understand why Clinton sees conspiracies everywhere. This paranoia, egged on by the B Twins, explains her failure to grasp the cataclysmic changes her own misconduct has wrought on her image, to say nothing of the societal and economic tectonic shifts at work. No, it’s all the GOP’s fault.Blumenthal worked to spin Monica Lewinsky as a crazed stalker of an innocent president, and his hundreds of gossipy emails urged Clinton to do all she could to topple Moammar Gadhafi when she was secretary of State without realizing that it would open the door and let the terrorists waltz in. He hides in the shadows, ducking subpoenas and frantically emailing his crazy self-serving ideas while flattering his way into Clinton’s affections.Brock first came into the Clinton camp as a convert from conservatism. Before he did so, he outed Paula Jones, triggering Bill Clinton to lie to a grand jury, resulting in close to $1 million in payments to Jones and thousands to the court in fines, as well as disbarment and impeachment scandals. Now he serves to destroy Hillary Clinton’s career as well by counseling a scorched-earth policy that savages Sanders and alienates the very young people who must provide Clinton her political base in the general election.Neither the B Twins nor Bill Clinton’s rage can save the bewildered former secretary of State, who cannot understand why a funny thing is happening on her way to her coronation. Voters looked at her and ran screaming.
_
Feb 4, 2016
Feb 2, 2016
Jan 27, 2016
Jan 25, 2016
NOW You Can Wish Robert Faurisson a Happy Birthday in the Comment Section.
Robert Faurisson
For more than 40 years, Robert Faurisson has been Europe's foremost Holocaust revisionist scholar. He was born on January 25, 1929, in Shepperton, England. His father was French and his mother was Scottish. As a boy and young man, he attended schools in Singapore, Japan, and in France. He was educated at a Lycée in Paris, and at the renowned Sorbonne. He received his "State Doctorate" in letters and the humanities from the Sorbonne in 1972, where he also taught from 1969 to 1974. From 1974 until 1990, Faurisson was a professor of French literature at the University of Lyon II. He is a recognized specialist of text and document analysis, and is the author of four books on French literature. After years of private research and study, Dr. Faurisson first made public his skeptical views about the Holocaust extermination story in two items published in December 1978 and January 1979 in the influential Paris daily Le Monde. In the archives of the Auschwitz State Museum in Poland , Faurisson discovered the technical and architectural drawings of the Auschwitz morgues, the crematories and other installations. He is the first person to publicize these important documents, and to point out their significance. Since 1978, Dr. Faurisson has presented his critical view of the Holocaust extermination story in numerous articles, in many interviews, in several books, and in stunning April 1979 debate on a Swiss television network with prominent defenders of the "exterminationist" view. Many of his scholarly articles have been published in English in The Journal of Historical Review. A four-volume collection of many of his writings, Écrits Révisionnistes (1974-1998), was published in 1999. Dr. Faurisson worked closely on the French revisionist quarterly, Annales d'Histoire Revisionniste, during the three years of its existence. He also worked on the successor quarterly, Revue d'Histoire Revisionniste. A cogent summary of his skeptical view of the “Holocaust” is his lengthy article, “Impact and Future of Holocaust Revisionism,” published in The Journal of Historical Review, Jan.-Feb. 2000. (It is posted online at http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v19/v19n1p-2_Faurisson.html ) Faurisson played an important role in both the 1985 and 1988 “Holocaust trials” in Toronto of Ernst Zundel. His role in those legal battles went far beyond his testimony on the stand as a witness. Especially during the 1985 trial, he spent hundreds of hours -- often working all day and very late into the night -- preparing questions used by defense attorney Doug Christie in his devastating interrogations of Raul Hilberg, Rudolf Vrba and other prosecution witnesses. Faurisson's most important contribution to the defense in the 1988 trial may well have been his key role in securing the participation of Fred Leuchter, an American gas chamber specialist. Faurisson played an important role in arranging for Leuchter's on-site investigation in Poland of supposed extermination gas chambers, and in making public the American’s remarkable findings. Much about Faurisson’s role in the 1988 “Holocaust trial” in Toronto, Canada, can be found in the 562-page book edited and compiled by Barbara Kulaszka, Did Six Million Really Die?: Report of the Evidence in the Canadian 'False News' Trial of Ernst Zündel. For years various government agencies and influential organizations have waged a concerted campaign to silence him. He has been obliged to defend himself many times in French courts for his forthright writings and statements. He has had to contend with numerous court convictions. His bank account has been frozen, and court officials have repeatedly visited his home threatening him and his wife with seizure of their furniture to pay for financial "damages" imposed for his “heretical” remarks. Because of this campaign, his family life has been repeatedly disrupted and thrown into turmoil. His health has suffered terribly. During an interview in December 1980 with the French radio network "Europe 1," Faurisson summarized the result of his historical research in one sentence of 60 French words. Here is that sentence, in English: “The alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews constitute one and the same historical lie, which made possible a gigantic financial-political fraud, the principal beneficiaries of which are the State of Israel and international Zionism, and whose principal victims are the German people -- but not their leaders -- and the entire Palestinian people.” That sentence, he declared 23 years later, “requires no changes.” For these provocative words, Faurisson was brought to trial on criminal charges of racial defamation and incitement to racial hatred. In July 1981 he was found guilty and given a suspended three month prison sentence, fined several thousand francs, and ordered to pay 3.6 million francs for the cost of making public the verdict on television and in periodicals. However, in June 1982 an appeals court threw out the charge of incitement to racial hatred and eliminated the 3.6 million franc payment. Among his other legal travails, in June 1995 a Paris court ordered Faurisson to pay a fine of $3,000 for writing Réponse à Jean-Claude Pressac sur le problème des chambres à gaz ("Response to Jean-Claude Pressac on the problem of the gas chambers"), a book that disputes claims of Second World War mass killings in German gas chambers. Henri Roques, another French revisionist, was likewise fined $3,000 by the court for distributing the work. (Roques is also the author of The 'Confessions' of Kurt Gerstein.) On September 25, 1997, Faurisson came to trial for a statement made in April 1996 about the Garaudy-Abbé Pierre affair in which he mentioned "the imposture of the Nazi gas chambers." During the trial he told the court: "We are only three years away from the year 2000, and there are billions of people who are asked to believe in something they have never seen and don't even know how it worked!" The prosecutor asked for a new kind of sentence: either imprisonment or a fine, to which Faurisson responded by declaring: "I hereby make a commitment that I shall not buy and shall not pay for my freedom. No one has ever bought me and no one will ever buy me." As expected, the Paris court handed down a guilty verdict. On October 23, 1997, it ordered Faurisson to pay 120,600 francs ($20,000), divided into three parts: 50,000 francs as a fine, 20,600 francs for a Jewish attorney, and 50,000 to pay for the publication of the summary of the court's judgment in two daily newspapers, as well as (unprecedentedly) in the Journal officiel de la République française. Faurisson paid the Jewish lawyer and was paying the fine in installments. However, he did not have to pay to promulgate the court judgment because, he has learned, the anti-revisionist organizations decided that they did not wish to see the publication of the words "the imposture of the Nazi gas chambers." In December 1997 Faurisson received a summons from a Paris court official for an essay, "The Horned Visions of the Holocaust," that had been posted on a website without his prior knowledge or approval. In this piece Faurisson wrote that "The Holocaust of the Jews is a fiction." He responded to the summons with a stern letter in which he defiantly declared his refusal to "collaborate" with French justice authorities and police in the repression of revisionism. On March 16, 1998, Faurisson had to appear before a Paris court to stand trial for a short definition of "revisionism," as inaccurately reported in a newspaper. On April 8, 1998 Faurisson was set to stand trial in Amsterdam for the publication in 1991 in Dutch of his detailed critical analysis of the Anne Frank Diary. (This analysis has been published in various editions, including in the Summer 1982 Journal of Historical Review, under the title “Is the Diary of Anne Frank Genuine?”). The Anne Frank Museum in Amsterdam and the Anne Frank Fonds in Basel, Switzerland, jointly brought the legal action. The Museum complained that it has been obliged to provide special training for its guides to respond to Faurisson's arguments, and that his critique might reduce the number of its visitors. On October 3, 2006, a Paris court found Faurisson guilty of “Holocaust denial” for having said, during an interview with Iranian television, that “there was never” a single execution gas chamber used by the Germans during World War II. That remark, the court found, was a violation of France’s “Holocaust denial” statute, the 1990 “Gayssot” law that makes it a crime to dispute or contest crimes against humanity, as defined by the joint military commission of the victorious Allied powers that met as a tribunal at Nuremberg 1945-46. After finding that Faurisson’s remark during the interview constituted “complicity in contesting the existence of a crime against humanity,” as determined by the Nuremberg inter-Allied tribunal, the court gave Dr. Faurisson a suspended prison sentence of three months, and fined him 7,500 euros (about $9,500). For his views Faurisson has repeatedly been a victim of physical assault. Between November 1978 and May 1993 he was a victim of ten attacks, at least nine of them carried out by Jewish thugs. None of the criminal assailants in any of these assaults has ever been brought to justice. The most savage was a nearly fatal attack on September 16, 1989, for which a group calling itself "The Sons of the Memory of the Jews" claimed responsibility. (For more, see "Jewish Militants: Fifteen Years, and More, of Terrorism in France ,” posted at http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v16/v16n2p-2_Faurisson.html , and The Zionist Terror Network, posted at http://www.ihr.org/books/ztn.html .) |
Jan 20, 2016
Jan 11, 2016
Jan 8, 2016
Jan 6, 2016
Jan 3, 2016
Jan 2, 2016
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)