Translate

Mar 16, 2010

The Holocaust is Now Catholic Dogma

 


Soğutma Büyüsü said on The Holocaust is Now Catholic Dogma

February 4, 2009 at 7:06 pm

Jewish professor Norman Finkelstein writes in his best selling book, The Holocaust Industry:

"Invoking the holocaust is a ploy to delegitimise all criticism of Jews", he adds, "By conferring total blamelessness on Jews the holocaust dogma immunizes Israel and American Jewry from legitimate censure."

See all comments on this post here.


--


Peace.

Michael Santomauro
Editorial Director
Call anytime: 917-974-6367
ReporterNotebook@Gmail.com

Amazon's: DEBATING THE HOLOCAUST: A New Look At Both Sides by Thomas Dalton

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.


Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.


Check out Yahoo! Movies to get a recap of this year's Oscar winners, red carpet looks & nominated film trailers.

.

__,_._,___

Israeli Apartheid and The Nakba-a new brilliant work by Anthony Lawson

 

Israeli Apartheid and The Nakba-a new brilliant work by Anthony Lawson 

Date

  Extract:  There can be absolutely no doubt that Israel has created an inhuman, illegal and utterly disgraceful Apartheid state, and the international community will never be able to excuse itself if it takes no action against this blatant, ongoing and in-plain-sight crime against humanity.

Please join the millions of decent people around the world who are crying out against Israel's ongoing persecution of the Palestinians. Send the link to this video to your elected representative and make sure he or she does something about it. You have to ask yourself: If I keep quiet , will it ever end?

To watch the film:

http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/israeli-apartheid-and-the-nakba-a-new-brilliant-work-by-anth.html

Gaza's Guernica...

"Approximately 1500..." is a 30 meter long anti-war mural painted by 25 young artists in Gaza. The war against Gaza killed ca 1400 people, 431 children were among the victims. 5038 people were injured, 411 of them badly. The artists painted their own experiences from the war: "We hope the mural will encourage people to say "It's enough!"?
 
To watch the film:

 



--


Peace.

Michael Santomauro
Editorial Director
Call anytime: 917-974-6367
ReporterNotebook@Gmail.com

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___

Steve Johnson takes on the Prime Uglies who hate free expression

 

Steve Johnson takes on the Prime Uglies who hate free expression

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBH6_QTglls

 

 

THERE IS NO FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN OUR SOCIETY

 

Hidden agenda!

 

You find that question offensive?

 

 




--

Peace.

Michael Santomauro
Editorial Director
Call anytime: 917-974-6367
ReporterNotebook@Gmail.com

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.


Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.


Check out Yahoo! Movies to get a recap of this year's Oscar winners, red carpet looks & nominated film trailers.

.

__,_._,___

NEW YORK TIMES GUNNING FOR THE POPE?

 

Monday, March 15, 2010 

NEW YORK TIMES GUNNING FOR THE POPE?

 

Catholic League president Bill Donohue takes on the New York Times:

 

On March 10, the New York Times ran an article on sex abuse in the Catholic Church stating that in Austria a priest abused a boy 40 years ago. Yesterday, readers learned of a German case where a man says he was abused in 1979. But when Rabbi Baruch Lebovits was found guilty last week on eight counts of sexually abusing a Brooklyn boy, the Times failed to report it. This is not an accident—it is deliberate.

 

Worse, on Saturday, the Times ran a front-page story saying that in 2002, when the sex abuse scandal in Boston hit, the pope—then Cardinal Ratzinger—"made statements that minimized the problem." No quotes or evidence of any kind were given. "Minimize the problem." Interesting phrase. In 2005, the Times reported that in 2002, Ratzinger believed that "less than 1 percent of priests are guilty" of sex abuse (it was later found that 4 percent was a more accurate figure). The Times characterized his remark by saying he "appeared to minimize the problem." Looks like they got their talking points down just fine.

 

What the Times could have said over the weekend was that on January 9, 2002, three days after the Boston Globe broke the story on sex abuse, it ran a story reporting that Ratzinger had sent a letter to the bishops worldwide saying that "even a hint" of the sexual abuse of minors merited an investigation. But to do so would have compromised the conclusion it sought to reach.

 

If the Times were truly interested in eradicating sex abuse, it not only would report on cases like Rabbi Lebovits, it would not seek to protect the public school establishment. But it does. Here's the proof. Last year, there were two bills being debated in Albany on the subject of sex abuse: one targeted only private institutions like the Catholic Church, giving the public schools a pass; the other covered both private and public. The Times endorsed the former.

 

Contact NYT Public Editor Clark Hoyt: public@nytimes.com

 

Susan A. Fani

Director of Communications

Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights

catalyst@catholicleague.org

New York, NY 10123

212-371-3191

212-371-3394 (fax)

 

http://catholicleague.org/release.php?id=1794

 




--


Peace.

Michael Santomauro
Editorial Director
Call anytime: 917-974-6367
ReporterNotebook@Gmail.com

Amazon's: DEBATING THE HOLOCAUST: A New Look At Both Sides by Thomas Dalton

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.


Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.


Check out Yahoo! Movies to get a recap of this year's Oscar winners, red carpet looks & nominated film trailers.

.

__,_._,___

"ADL's Foxman under Attack"

 




ADL'S FOXMAN UNDER ATTACK

By Rev. Ted Pike
16 Mar 10

The prestige of Abraham H. Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League, has never been lower. A recent biting article by J. J. Goldberg in the Jewish Forward reveals that criticism of Foxman continues to expand, especially from leaders of the American Jewish community. Increasingly, American Jewish intellectuals fear that Foxman, while decrying the anti-Obama "paranoia" of the religious right, may be a victim of his own paranoid obsession with anti-Semitism where it doesn't exist. (See Goldberg article Foxman Fever Doesn't Discriminate)

Goldberg: "Foxman is the country's most prolific anti-Semitism spotter, the gestalt guy who sees Jew-haters under every bed and invents them if he can't find them." He writes of respected journalist James Traub's 2007 New York Times Magazine profile:

In his telling, Foxman is "the hanging-judge of anti-Semitism," an "anachronism" who continues to "harp on Jewish insecurity" in a world where Jews have become "the most widely admired religious group in America, as well as the most successful." Portraying him as a blustering alarmist, Traub seemed bemused by Foxman's warnings about "jihadist" anti-Semitism as a serious threat in today's world and troubled by Foxman's focus on "good for the Jews, bad for the Jews" to the exclusion of broader goals of "promoting tolerance and diversity."

Goldberg says this critique is abounding. Recently,

for example, Republicans have been savaging Foxman for … attacking right-wing extremists even when they support Israel. Last November, for example, Commentary editor Jonathan Tobin wrote that the ADL had "stepped over the line" and was trying to stifle criticism of the Obama administration with the publication of a report, "Rage Grows in America: Anti-Government Conspiracies," which warned of anti-democratic tendencies and intolerance in far-right movements like the Tea Parties and in the rhetoric of media figures like Glenn Beck.

Goldberg relates how in January, Foxman again faced angry conservatives over his accusation that Rush Limbaugh committed "borderline anti-Semitic stereotyping" because he said many Wall Street bankers are Jewish. Normon Podhoretz scoffed, saying Foxman "has a long history of seeing an anti-Semite under every conservative bed" and should "apologize for the defamatory accusation of anti-Semitism that he himself has hurled against so loyal a friend of Israel as Rush Limbaugh."

One activist went so far as to demand "a class-action lawsuit by ADL donors to demand new leadership," reports Goldberg.

Perhaps the hardest hit against Foxman came from former ADL vice chairman Joel Sprayregen. Describing recent ADL history, Sprayregen says, "ADL stumbled so egregiously. As observed by many, including myself, who have left the organization, the ADL has declined into an autocracy where no opinion counts other than that of its long-time national director Abraham Foxman, whom the New York Times described as "a one-man Sanhedrin for life." When Foxman hatches a crackpot idea like the "Rage Report," no one can restrain him…Foxman is driven to justify his half-million dollar-plus salary (matched in virtually no other Jewish organization)…To generate publicity for himself, he launches (and then summarily drops) foolish initiatives, such as his attack on Christian evangelicals, Israel's most consistent supporters…" (See Ex-ADL Leader Blasts ADL/Foxman)

Decline of ADL Power

Such criticism of ADL among Jews is unheard of in ADL's 97-year history. In 1982, Israel saturation-bombed Lebanon, killing tens of thousands of innocent refugees. But criticism from evangelicals was virtually nonexistent. Apart from a few voices— particularly Rep. Paul Findley, the Washington Report on Mideast Affairs and the Spotlight newspaper (now American Free Press)—major American media considered Israel beyond reproach. There was no substantive movement to halt or even criticize Israel's mistreatment of Palestinians.

As Israel's formidable PR representative, ADL had never ridden higher than at this time. If anyone dared speak the truth—particularly about anti-Christian/Gentile hatred in rabbinic Judaism's sacred Talmudic scriptures or such taboo realities as Jewish control of big media, Jewish origins of communism, or Jewish control in Congress—ADL descended in fiery attack from one of its 34 regional offices. It would enlist local media, particularly Messianic Jews, to destroy the offending "anti-Semite's" reputation.

When I released my first major video, The Other Israel, in 1987, it spoke the whole truth about Talmudic Judaism through an explosive new medium. Since publication of my book, Israel: Our Duty, Our Dilemma, in 1984, I had been treading further on untested ice than anyone in nearly a half century. The Spotlight said The Other Israel was so hot they would sell me advertising but not review the film. The most important question to me was how populist America would react. Zionist critic Michael Hoffman II told me I would be setting a record if I sold 50 copies. After three months, I had sold over ten thousand! (Watch The Other Israel here.)

ADL went on high alert. In Seattle they summoned a special conference, including local clergy, to consider this unprecedented threat. They boasted that in a year and a half they would destroy the National Prayer Network.

In Portland, my father's daily radio program, The Claude Pike Report, aired on Oregon's largest Christian radio station, KPDQ, and was an important focal point for Christian/conservative activism in our state. After we showed my film at a meeting of several hundred Christian conservatives and leaders in Portland, ADL leapt into action. It activated the Jewish-owned Oregonian newspaper to sound the alarm against the "virulent anti-Semitism" we represented. ADL's smears against us set off a stampede among Christian conservative leaders in Oregon to put as much distance between themselves and the Pikes as possible. Lew Davies, popular KPDQ talk show host, spent two and a half afternoons on air portraying me as a raving anti-Semite, virtually no higher than a child molester. He frankly said he never read my book or saw my video but, with ADL, the Oregonian and respected figures marshaled against me, no one seemed bothered by the omission. Asked if he would allow Ted Pike to give his side, Davies replied that I was beneath representation. My father was thrown off KPDQ and our reputations destroyed among tens of thousands of evangelicals in Oregon and Washington. This was typical of the mistreatment anyone might expect from ADL if they publicly criticized Israel or matters Jewish through most of the 20th century.

How different it is today! Bedeviled by criticism, ADL and the Jewish state it represents fight to keep operational their historically most effective tool for self-defense and advancement: their power to defame as "anti-Semites" anyone who criticizes them.

Yet, Eric Fingerhut, in the Jerusalem Post, reports that an increasing number of Israel's critics now consider it a badge of honor to be labeled "anti-Semitic" by Israel!

In the late 1980s at their annual New York conference, ADL focused on Ted Pike and racist Tom Metzger as the two greatest threats to their agenda. Now, surrounded by a host of adversaries, ADL has gradually stopped giving me such priority. ADL does have 11 pages of nonsense against me at their website (Read my rebuttal, My Response to ADL's Attack). But today my voice in criticism of Zionist control and oppression has been joined by figures of such stature as former President Jimmy Carter, academics Mearsheimer and Walt, Norman Finkelstein, jurist Samuel Goldstone and many others including the United Nations and European countries. (Half of Europeans are now critical of Israel, as are three quarters of Spaniards are.) With Israel's brutality against the Palestinians increasingly condemned, the Anti-Defamation League can no longer diversify its damage control in order to defame lesser critics.

It's an ideal time to destroy ADL!

Evangelicals still Terrified of ADL

More than any force except Jewish media, ADL is destroying the moral underpinnings of our nation and civilization. ADL now boasts that it is architect of 45 US state hate laws as well as the federal law. Are evangelicals seizing this moment to weaken ADL's destructive influence? No.

In his article, Goldberg says "Republicans" are heaping criticism on Foxman for his "Rage Report." Actually, Republican leaders who did so, at least initially, were few. Jonathan Tobin blasted ADL in Commentary. Joseph Farah wrote a piece for World Net Daily basically warning ADL, "Don't call me anti-Semitic!" I wrote a salvo of articles alerting America to ADL's attack which soared to reprints on over 100 blogs and websites. In contrast, a cowering religious right remains eerily silent about ADL's characterization of millions of conservatives as "conspirators." Evangelicals still remember ADL's previously unrestrained powers of recrimination.

But such power is fading and could end if evangelicals emerge from hiding—and give chase! It's time to drive this bullying, corrupting, illegal agent of a foreign power from the only remaining country able to be a beacon of freedom and free speech to the world. At this auspicious moment, Christian conservatives can make no greater contribution to liberty than to speak out boldly in criticism of ADL.

ADL must go the way of the dinosaur—particularly that dinosaur most like ADL, Tyrannosaurus Rex.



~~~~~~~~~

Rev. Ted Pike is director of the National Prayer Network, a Christian/conservative watchdog organization.

TALK SHOW HOSTS: Interview Rev. Ted Pike on this subject. Call (503) 631-3808.


NATIONAL PRAYER NETWORK, P.O. Box 828, Clackamas, OR 97015
www.truthtellers.org



--


Peace.

Michael Santomauro
Editorial Director
Call anytime: 917-974-6367
ReporterNotebook@Gmail.com

Amazon's: DEBATING THE HOLOCAUST: A New Look At Both Sides by Thomas Dalton

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.


Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.


Check out Yahoo! Movies to get a recap of this year's Oscar winners, red carpet looks & nominated film trailers.

.

__,_._,___

Tikun Olam : 'Moral Politics' TV Interview on Mossad Dubai Assassination

 

Tikun Olam-תקון עולם: Make the World a Better Place

March 15, 2010 10:59 PM

'Moral Politics' TV Interview on Mossad Dubai Assassination


Watch Mossad Assassination in Dubai.

Yesterday, I filmed a 30 minute interview with Bill Alford for his Moral Politics TV show about the Mossad assassination of Hamas leader Mahmoud al-Mabouh in Dubai.  It's a handy introduction to the many posts I've written on the subject and roves over territory like targeted assassinations, the Mossad's trampling on




--


The World's Most Important Visual Holocaust Revisionist Website!

Peace.

Michael Santomauro
Editorial Director
Call anytime: 917-974-6367
ReporterNotebook@Gmail.com

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.


Check out Yahoo! Movies to get a recap of this year's Oscar winners, red carpet looks & nominated film trailers.


Check out Yahoo! Movies to get a recap of this year's Oscar winners, red carpet looks & nominated film trailers.

.

__,_._,___

Anti-Semitism: Zionism’s indispensable alibi

 



Anti-Semitism: Zionism's indispensable alibi

aletho | March 15, 2010 at 5:00 pm | Categories: Deception, Ethnic Cleansing, Racism, Zionism | URL: http://wp.me/pIUmC-1My
By Maidhc Ó Cathail | 15 March 2010

Although Zionism typically represents itself as the solution to anti-Semitism, the truth is less flattering. In fact, hostility toward Jews is indispensable to the cause of Jewish nationalism. If anti-Semitism didn't exist, Zionists would have to invent it. And in many cases that is precisely what they have done.

Contrary to the widespread perception that Zionism opposes anti-Semitism, its adherents have occasionally revealed a more ambivalent attitude to Jew-hatred. In 1895, Theodor Herzl, the founder of modern Zionism, prophetically wrote in his Diaries: "Anti-Semites will become our surest friends, anti-Semitic countries our allies." Even the suffering inflicted on European Jewry by the Nazi holocaust doesn't seem to have unduly tempered such cynicism. In 1995, Jay Lefkowitz, an American government official, told the New York Times Magazine: "Deep down, I believe that a little anti-Semitism is a good thing for the Jews— reminds them who they are."

If Zionist extremists can't provoke the desired level of anti-Semitism to advance their goals, they are even prepared to fake it. A 1952 article in Davar, the official organ of Mapai, the party of the then Israeli Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion, suggested sending a team of saboteurs "to help redeem Jews" from the countries where they are "absorbed in sinful self-satisfaction".

"The task of these young men," the article explained, "would be to disguise themselves as non-Jews, and, acting upon the brutal Zionism, plague these Jews with anti-Semitic slogans, such as 'Bloody Jew', 'Jews go to Palestine' and similar 'intimacies'."

Lest anyone doubt that the Israeli government would ever contemplate carrying out such a cynical plot to encourage Jews to move to Israel, the "rescue" of about 125,000 Iraqi Jews in the early 1950s involved far worse acts. "In attempts to portray the Iraqis as anti-American and to terrorize the Jews," wrote former CIA officer Wilbur Eveland in Ropes of Sand, "the Zionists planted bombs in the US Information Service library and in synagogues. Soon leaflets began to appear urging Jews to flee to Israel."

Whatever about posing as "Arab anti-Semites", one might think that Zionists would draw the line at a post-holocaust sponsorship of Nazism. Yet this is exactly what a leading Canadian Zionist organization has been accused of. "In the 1960s, the Canadian Jewish Congress (CJC) paid John Garrity, a small-time mercenary, to build up the fledgling Canadian Nazi Party," reveals Ezra Levant in Shakedown. When the embarrassing truth emerged, it was justified by the CJC as an attempt to learn more about neo-Nazism. However, the real purpose, according to the Jewish Canadian writer, was to provide "a pretext for the addition of 'hate' laws to the criminal code".

While "hate" sounds like something that all decent people would condemn, one man's hate may be another man's righteous indignation. Zionists, for example, tend to conflate anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism, and, therefore, as something that could be considered a "hate crime".

But are Professors John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt engaged in hate propaganda by documenting the harmful influence of the Israel lobby over US foreign policy? Or is former US President Jimmy Carter a "bigot" for comparing the Israeli occupation of Palestine to apartheid South Africa? Are the survivors of the USS Liberty who refuse to remain silent about Israel's deliberate attack on their ship merely motivated by hatred of Jews? Is Professor Norman Finkelstein a "self-hating Jew" for exposing the holocaust Industry's corruption of history and memory in the service of an extortion racket? And is UN special rapporteur Richard Falk also "self-hating" for likening Israel's actions against the besieged Gazans to what the Nazis did to Jews in the Warsaw Ghetto?

In each of these cases, by no means an exhaustive list, the charge of anti-Semitism, rather than serving to protect Jewish people from defamation, has been used to obscure Zionist crimes.

However, as Zionist criminality becomes increasingly transparent, there will most likely be a sharp rise in anti-Semitism worldwide. No doubt much of it will be the result of genuine, albeit misdirected, anger as the extent of Zionist crimes against humanity becomes more widely known. But considering Zionism's history of faking attacks on Jews, we can expect at least some of this "hate" to be the work of Jewish extremists who disingenuously claim to be fighting anti-Semitism.

Perhaps it's time for those who are genuinely concerned about combating hatred in the world to heed the words of Israel Shahak. As the great Israeli humanist concluded in his classic Jewish History, Jewish Religion: "Although the struggle against anti-Semitism (and of all other forms of racism) should never cease, the struggle against Jewish chauvinism and exclusivism ... is now of equal or greater importance."

Add a comment to this post

--

Peace.

Michael Santomauro
Editorial Director
Call anytime: 917-974-6367
ReporterNotebook@Gmail.com

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.


Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.


Check out Yahoo! Movies to get a recap of this year's Oscar winners, red carpet looks & nominated film trailers.

.

__,_._,___