Translate

Oct 2, 2010

What Really Happened?

 

9/11

Index of What Really Happened



http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/wrh_9-11_index.html


--


Being happy–is it good for the Jews? "Before Professor Dershowitz accused me of being an anti-Semite (news to me), I was a happy person. Since then, I'm still a happy person". –Michael Santomauro

An antisemite condemns people for being Jews, I am not an antisemite.--Michael Santomauro



Most of us are mentally trapped to think Jewish!!
Actually, it is safe to say that virtually every mainstream publication or or other type of media organ is "nothing more than a screen to present chosen views." The great battle over the last century has been a battle for the mind of the Western peoples, i.e., non-Jewish Euros. The chosen won it by acquiring control over essentially the complete mainstream news, information, education and entertainment media of every type, and using that control to infuse and disseminate their message, agenda and worldview, their way of thinking, or rather the way they want us to think. Since at least the 1960s this campaign has been effectively complete. Since then they have shaped and controlled the minds of all but a seeming few of us in varying degree with almost no opposition or competition from any alternative worldview. So now most of us are mentally trapped in the box the chosen have made for us, which we have lived in all our lives. Only a few have managed to avoid it or escape it, or to even sometimes see outside of it, and so actually "think outside of the (Jewish) box." --Michael Santomauro

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___

Video Clips: Rick Sanchez: Jews Run CNN & All Media

 




--

Being happy–is it good for the Jews? "Before Professor Dershowitz accused me of being an anti-Semite (news to me), I was a happy person. Since then, I'm still a happy person". –Michael Santomauro

An antisemite condemns people for being Jews, I am not an antisemite.--Michael Santomauro



Most of us are mentally trapped to think Jewish!!
Actually, it is safe to say that virtually every mainstream publication or or other type of media organ is "nothing more than a screen to present chosen views." The great battle over the last century has been a battle for the mind of the Western peoples, i.e., non-Jewish Euros. The chosen won it by acquiring control over essentially the complete mainstream news, information, education and entertainment media of every type, and using that control to infuse and disseminate their message, agenda and worldview, their way of thinking, or rather the way they want us to think. Since at least the 1960s this campaign has been effectively complete. Since then they have shaped and controlled the minds of all but a seeming few of us in varying degree with almost no opposition or competition from any alternative worldview. So now most of us are mentally trapped in the box the chosen have made for us, which we have lived in all our lives. Only a few have managed to avoid it or escape it, or to even sometimes see outside of it, and so actually "think outside of the (Jewish) box." --Michael Santomauro

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.


Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.


Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.

.

__,_._,___

Israel's Jewish Character Is Subject for Debate

 






Palestinian-American freelance journalist

Posted: September 30, 2010 03:49 PM



Benjamin Netanyahu and Barack Obama have spent a great deal of energy trying to forestall any discussion of Israel's Jewish character and what that actually means. The Israelis want the feckless and illegitimate Palestinian Authority head, Mahmoud Abbas, to affirm Israel's "right to exist as the Jewish state." But that raises the question: Does Israel have a right to continue as a race-exclusive state?

Israel is the Jewish state for the Jewish people. It came to be through an act of ethnic cleansing -- creating the world's most protracted refugee crisis in the process. Today, the Jewish state is home to about 1.5 million non-Jews. To be a non-Jew in the Jewish state is to be a second-class citizen. The ideology that underpins the existence of the Jewish state -- Zionism -- is a racist doctrine.

Zionism is the belief that Jewish people ought to be privileged in Palestine/Israel solely because of their race. Moreover, non-Jewish indigenous people -- the Palestinians -- must be forced off the land so that it can be settled by Jews. That's what happened in 1948 and that's what's happening today in East Jerusalem and the West Bank. Many liberal Zionists don't like to acknowledge it, but the process that yielded the land west of the green line was just as wrong as anything the setters have done. Its scale was also several magnitudes larger.

I don't believe that militia that purged my people from their lands to create a racially pure Jewish state had a right to do so. I don't believe that the Jewish state has a right to exclude me from living as an equal citizen on the lands of my forefathers. I have a right to exist in Be'er Sheeva -- that's where my family is from. But, I am barred from doing so because I am not Jewish.

And that's really what all of this is about. I believe strongly that all people are equal, irrespective of race or religion. Israel was founded on just the opposite view. Most people agree that no state that takes racial supremacy as its foundational germ has a right to resist reform. So why is Israel the exception? Well, it's not.

It's astonishing that this is a controversial view in the 21st century. It's surely a feat of Zionist historicizing that otherwise intelligent and moral people in the West continuously affirm the "right of Israel to exist as the Jewish state." The racism inherent in this statement -- Jewish privilege exists through ethnic cleansing and apartheid -- is appalling. Yet, people uncritically affirm that "right."

Frankly, it is perverse and absurd to ask a brutalized people, a people who have been ethnically cleansed from their homes at the ends of European Zionist guns, to affirm the "right of the Jewish state to exist."

Barack Obama recently told the UN General Assembly that "Israel's existence should not be subject for debate." The American president should be reminded that as Leader of the Free World, his mandate ends with Palestine; the Palestinians are not free. Furthermore, as the principal enabler of Jewish Likudik policies, Obama is hardly a disinterested party to the conflict. He has a vested interest in a robust Israeli occupation. The Israel lobby threatens to derail his bid for reelection, and the lobby endorses Jewish privilege. That's how Obama ends up stumping for a racist state at the UN.

The existence of colonial entities is always subject for debate, and Obama should understand that. When he took the Oval office, he famously returned the bust of Winston Churchill to the British authorities. He was right to do so. Churchill was a rabid colonialist and was Prime Minister when Britain suppressed the Kenyan Mau Mau rebellion. Obama's grandfather was tortured by the colonial British authorities for resisting colonialism and fighting for his freedom.

The elder Obama had it right. Freedom is a human prerogative which propels people to resist overwhelming power, even in the face of torture. One wonders how the grandfather would react to see his grandson come down so forcefully on the side of racial oppression and colonialism.

It is time for the world to reject Zionism and Jewish privilege in Palestine/Israel. It is time for all the people in Palestine/Israel to live as equals. It worked in South Africa, and it has to work there.

I will never affirm the right of a Jewish person to purge my grandparents from their lands for being the wrong race. But I will work with that Jewish person's grandchild to create a non-racist, egalitarian future for all of us. What I'm talking about is the one-state solution, where all the people of Palestine/Israel live as equals under the law. Is that really so controversial?





--

Being happy–is it good for the Jews? "Before Professor Dershowitz accused me of being an anti-Semite (news to me), I was a happy person. Since then, I'm still a happy person". –Michael Santomauro

An antisemite condemns people for being Jews, I am not an antisemite.--Michael Santomauro



Most of us are mentally trapped to think Jewish!!
Actually, it is safe to say that virtually every mainstream publication or or other type of media organ is "nothing more than a screen to present chosen views." The great battle over the last century has been a battle for the mind of the Western peoples, i.e., non-Jewish Euros. The chosen won it by acquiring control over essentially the complete mainstream news, information, education and entertainment media of every type, and using that control to infuse and disseminate their message, agenda and worldview, their way of thinking, or rather the way they want us to think. Since at least the 1960s this campaign has been effectively complete. Since then they have shaped and controlled the minds of all but a seeming few of us in varying degree with almost no opposition or competition from any alternative worldview. So now most of us are mentally trapped in the box the chosen have made for us, which we have lived in all our lives. Only a few have managed to avoid it or escape it, or to even sometimes see outside of it, and so actually "think outside of the (Jewish) box." --Michael Santomauro

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.


Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.


Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.

.

__,_._,___

Texas school board to ditch pro-Islam textbooks

 






news.gif
afp_logo_51.png

Texas school board to ditch pro-Islam textbooks

Fri Sep 24, 6:54 pm ET


CHICAGO (AFP) – The Texas board of education voted Friday to to reject any textbooks which paint Islam in too favorable of a light, vowing to curtail what it sees as a "pro-Islam/anti-Christian" bias in school books.
The move comes months after the socially-conservative board enacted new social studies standards which championed capitalism and Republican party values and questioned whether the country was truly founded on the separation of church and state.
Texas is the largest textbook market in the United States and its rules influence what children across the country will learn at school.
The resolution adopted Friday cites "politically-correct whitewashes of Islamic culture and stigmas on Christian civilization" in current textbooks and warns that "more such discriminatory treatment of religion may occur as Middle Easterners buy into the US public school textbook oligopoly."
It vowed to reject any future textbooks which devote more space to teaching about Islam than Christianity, include "sanitized definitions of 'jihad,'" or display bias by describing Christian crusaders as "invaders" when Muslim "conquest" is called "migration" by "empire builders."
Critics said the resolution, which passed 7-6, was a further attempt to politicize education and was based on false claims.
"It is hard not to conclude that the members who voted for this resolution were solely interested in playing on fear and bigotry in order to pit Christians against Muslims," said Kathy Miller, president of the Texas Freedom Network, which aims to counter the religious right and protect individual liberties.
The move comes amid a rise of anti-Islamic rhetoric in parts of the United States which has sparked violent protests and riots around the world.
An obscure Florida pastor sparked widespread outrage after he vowed to burn hundreds of Korans on the anniversary of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.
While he eventually recanted, US officials said the nation's reputation had been significantly damaged.
The nation has also been embroiled in a politically-charged debate over the establishment of an Islamic center near Ground Zero in New York, one of the sites of the 2001 attacks.
The resolution was slammed by its opponents on the board during a contentious meeting, the paper reported on its website.
"This makes us look cuckoo. It's crazy," said board member Rick Agosto. "We are allowing ourselves to be distracted by this narrow-minded resolution, which is itself biased. We should have taken the higher ground on this."
Board member Lawrence Allen, a practicing Muslim, called the language in the resolution "offensive."
"These are baseless accusations, and this resolution is unfair," he was quoted as saying.
The resolution sends a warning to publishers, but does not alter current standards which are not up for review for several years.
"This resolution will ensure upfront that potential biases are taken care of before these books reach the board," the Dallas Morning News quoted chairwoman Gail Lowe as saying.


pixel.gif





--

Being happy–is it good for the Jews? "Before Professor Dershowitz accused me of being an anti-Semite (news to me), I was a happy person. Since then, I'm still a happy person". –Michael Santomauro

An antisemite condemns people for being Jews, I am not an antisemite.--Michael Santomauro



Most of us are mentally trapped to think Jewish!!
Actually, it is safe to say that virtually every mainstream publication or or other type of media organ is "nothing more than a screen to present chosen views." The great battle over the last century has been a battle for the mind of the Western peoples, i.e., non-Jewish Euros. The chosen won it by acquiring control over essentially the complete mainstream news, information, education and entertainment media of every type, and using that control to infuse and disseminate their message, agenda and worldview, their way of thinking, or rather the way they want us to think. Since at least the 1960s this campaign has been effectively complete. Since then they have shaped and controlled the minds of all but a seeming few of us in varying degree with almost no opposition or competition from any alternative worldview. So now most of us are mentally trapped in the box the chosen have made for us, which we have lived in all our lives. Only a few have managed to avoid it or escape it, or to even sometimes see outside of it, and so actually "think outside of the (Jewish) box." --Michael Santomauro

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___

“They Talked to Me so Hateful that I Just Quit”: Whites Blamed for Black Farmer Failure

 


American Third Position


Why Do We Pay Congress?

Posted: 01 Oct 2010 03:43 AM PDT

The base salary of a U.S. Congressman and Senator is $174,000 plus benefits and official expenses which totals around $1.5 million per year each. Yet these leaders can't even be bothered to do the work for which they are so well-paid.

The shocking state of affairs was revealed for the world to see this week when Congress "ended" its current sitting without even completing its most basic job, that of approving a budget for the government year.

In addition, legislators also simply postponed votes on a number of vital issues, including an economic stimulus measure, the health care law, and global warming legislation, amongst other things.

In any other profession, a failure to complete those basic tasks which are vital to the central core of a job would result in instant dismissal. But the august gentlemen and ladies of Congress and the Senate seem to be immune from this rule which applies to the rest of us.

So what is the real reason for their refusal to do even the most basic of tasks for which they are paid?

The answer is more obvious than one might at first consider: they are cowards without the courage of their convictions to make decisions for which the voters might find them accountable.

The Congress and Senate have deliberately put off votes on all issues which are "political hot potatoes" until after the November elections so their voting choices cannot be used against them in the campaign.

The game was given away by Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., who admitted to the Associated Press (AP) that "It would be one thing if you have a chance to pass something, then by all means have a vote. But it was pretty clear that it was going to be mutually assured destruction."

Senate Majority leader Harry Reid confirmed this reasoning by telling the AP that "We may not agree on much, but I think, with rare exception, all 100 senators want to get out of here and get back to their states."

Even more interesting was the decision to delay the ethics trials of Reps. Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., and Maxine Waters, D-Calif., until after the elections.

The reason for the postponement is that both these cases will reveal how legislators "legally" abuse the system for their own benefit. This in turn will demonstrate how many of their colleagues are shamelessly, but probably legally, ripping off the taxpayers.

Instead of passing a budget for the year, Congress passed a stopgap bill to keep the government functioning until after November in a move which the AP correctly described as a "reminder of the dismal performance by Congress in doing its most basic job, passing an annual budget and the spending bills for agency operations."

According to the AP, only "two of a dozen annual appropriations bills have passed the House this year and none has passed the Senate as Democratic leaders have opted against lengthy floor debates and politically difficult votes on spending."

"They Talked to Me so Hateful that I Just Quit": Whites Blamed for Black Farmer Failure

Posted: 01 Oct 2010 02:11 AM PDT

Black farmers in America, formally organized into the overtly racial "National Black Farmers Association" or NBFA, are set to get billions of dollars of taxpayers' money after claiming that "white racism" is the reason why they have failed in their enterprises.

The astonishing development, which will most likely take place once Congress reconvenes after the upcoming elections, is the result of a bill which will allege that "racism" is the reason why so many black farmers have gone bankrupt, particularly in the South.

A June 2008 convention of litigants, organized by Rep. Artur Davis, D-Ala, provided an insight into the mindset which is driving the bill and its supporters.

An Associated Press report from the time takes up the story:

Ronnie Clark, 50, was among the first to sue. He said he tried to grow corn and peanuts in the 1980s but gave up after being denied loans from the government.

"I went and tried to get a loan and they talked to me so hateful that I just quit," said Clark, who is from Brundidge, Ala., and now works on a transportation maintenance crew for the state. "They told me I had to own so much land for collateral. I just quit trying to borrow."

The Obama administration has, not surprisingly, indicated that it is going to set aside $1.2 billion to pay out "discrimination" claims such as these. With more than 70,000 claimants, the total bill is however expected to be in excess of $3 billion.

This is not the first time that these obviously bogus "discrimination" claims by black farmers have ripped off the taxpayers.

In 1999, a $2 billion settlement was made by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) after the NBFA's president testified before the United States House Committee on Agriculture and NFBA representatives met with President Bill Clinton at the White House.

That settlement has now been attacked by the NFBA as "incomplete" because a further 70,000 claimants were "excluded." The current legislation will provide for these "new" cases.

There are a number of interesting points to emerge from this shameful episode:

- Once again, utterly spurious and obviously artificially invented "white racism" is being blamed for black failure.

If black farmers have failed because they are unable to meet basic loan requirements, that is hardly the fault of the government in general and white people in particular.

- The existence of a National Black Farmers' Association and its official recognition at the highest level of government is clear proof that the only real "racism" is against white people.

Would a "National Association of White Farmers" be granted permission to testify before the Senate and be hosted in the White House? Unlikely, to say the least. Instead, such an organization would be hounded out of town as "racist."

- The lack of a "National Association of White Farmers" means that there are no statistics available on the number of white farmers who have been denied loans.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) claims that there are about 960,000 persons who claim farming as their principal occupation, and a similar number of farmers who claim some other principal occupation.

According to the EPA, for "the purposes of the U.S. Census, a farm is any establishment which produced and sold, or normally would have produced and sold, $1,000 or more of agricultural products during the year. (Government subsidies are included in sales.) By that definition, there are just over 2.1 million farms in the United States.

"It has been estimated that living expenses for the average farm family exceed $47,000 per year. Clearly, many farms that meet the U.S. Census' definition would not produce sufficient income to meet farm family living expenses. In fact, fewer than 1 in 4 of the farms in this country produce gross revenues in excess of $50,000," the EPA reported, adding that "an economically viable crop/livestock operation in the Corn Belt would have between 2,000 and 3,000 acres of row crops and between 500 and 600 sows."

From these EPA figures, it is clear that farming is an extremely hard occupation and subject to intense financial pressures. It is a simple cop-out for blacks to blame whites for their own failure in maintaining and running these highly complex operations.

It is time that blacks and other nonwhites stopped blaming whites for all the ills which affect their communities and accept responsibility for their own actions.




--

Being happy–is it good for the Jews? "Before Professor Dershowitz accused me of being an anti-Semite (news to me), I was a happy person. Since then, I'm still a happy person". –Michael Santomauro

An antisemite condemns people for being Jews, I am not an antisemite.--Michael Santomauro



Most of us are mentally trapped to think Jewish!!
Actually, it is safe to say that virtually every mainstream publication or or other type of media organ is "nothing more than a screen to present chosen views." The great battle over the last century has been a battle for the mind of the Western peoples, i.e., non-Jewish Euros. The chosen won it by acquiring control over essentially the complete mainstream news, information, education and entertainment media of every type, and using that control to infuse and disseminate their message, agenda and worldview, their way of thinking, or rather the way they want us to think. Since at least the 1960s this campaign has been effectively complete. Since then they have shaped and controlled the minds of all but a seeming few of us in varying degree with almost no opposition or competition from any alternative worldview. So now most of us are mentally trapped in the box the chosen have made for us, which we have lived in all our lives. Only a few have managed to avoid it or escape it, or to even sometimes see outside of it, and so actually "think outside of the (Jewish) box." --Michael Santomauro

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.


Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.


Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.

.

__,_._,___

Oct 1, 2010

Movie Review - 'Nuremberg' - The Nuremberg Trials in Stuart Schulberg’s Reconstructed Film - NYTimes.com

 



http://movies.nytimes.com/2010/09/29/movies/29nuremberg.html?nl=movies&emc=mua5

frank scott
email: frankscott@comcast.net

Frank Scott writes  political commentary which appears in  The Independent Monitor and  at the blog Legalienate

http://legalienate.blogspot.com



--

Being happy–is it good for the Jews? "Before Professor Dershowitz accused me of being an anti-Semite (news to me), I was a happy person. Since then, I'm still a happy person". –Michael Santomauro

An antisemite condemns people for being Jews, I am not an antisemite.--Michael Santomauro



Most of us are mentally trapped to think Jewish!!
Actually, it is safe to say that virtually every mainstream publication or or other type of media organ is "nothing more than a screen to present chosen views." The great battle over the last century has been a battle for the mind of the Western peoples, i.e., non-Jewish Euros. The chosen won it by acquiring control over essentially the complete mainstream news, information, education and entertainment media of every type, and using that control to infuse and disseminate their message, agenda and worldview, their way of thinking, or rather the way they want us to think. Since at least the 1960s this campaign has been effectively complete. Since then they have shaped and controlled the minds of all but a seeming few of us in varying degree with almost no opposition or competition from any alternative worldview. So now most of us are mentally trapped in the box the chosen have made for us, which we have lived in all our lives. Only a few have managed to avoid it or escape it, or to even sometimes see outside of it, and so actually "think outside of the (Jewish) box." --Michael Santomauro

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___