Translate

Nov 14, 2010

CORRECTION: The Anti-Semitic Side Of Zionism

 



THE ANTI-SEMITIC SIDE OF ZIONISM

 

An Israeli two hour documentary entitled "The Anti-Semitic Side of Zionism" explores the dark side of Theodore Herzl's conception of a Jewish state. It contains revealing information not known even to most revisionist students of the subject. Herzl expressed sentiments in his personal diary which would make even hardened anti-Semites blush. At one point in his private musings, Herzl fantasized about a mass conversion of Austria's Jews in the cathedral of Saint Stephen to cure them of their Jewishness. The ceremony was to be blessed by the Pope. At another point, Herzl conceived the idea of an anti-Semitic crusader to strip the Jews of their wealth. After all, stated Herzl, do not all the governments of the world do the bidding of rich Jews? The film makers have a great deal of fun in beguiling Jews on the street with these Herzl quotations. The reactions range from anger at the blatant "anti-Semitism" to befuddlement when they are told that Herzl, not Hitler, made them. A similarly amusing moment comes when the director of the Jabotinsky Institute is read a Jabotinsky quotation that Eastern European Jews who wish to migrate to Eretz Israel shall have to shave their locks and beards and start behaving like normal human beings. He bleats that the opinions are blatantly anti-Semitic. When informed that Vladimir Jabotinsky himself made the statements, he blanches, calls it "impossible" and then asks for the reference – which is immediately provided. 

Aside from the humor and the ignorance of the Jewish public, the documentary has important lessons for students of history. It shows consistently the Social Darwinist nature of the doctrine. The European Jews consistently looked down on the Middle Eastern, oriental Jews and sought to "modernize" them to make them "suitable' Zionist material. The Zionist attitude toward Jewish refugees from Nazi occupied Europe was even more lamentable. As Ben-Gurion himself stated, if he had to choose between moving all the Jewish children in England to Israel and saving only half to build the Zionist state, he would sacrifice the children to the needs of the Israeli state. The documentary quotes from internal memoranda of the Jewish Agency for Palestine about how to distinguish between "acceptable" and "unacceptable" émigrés. The young, strong and healthy were preferred while the elderly and decrepit were expendable. Always, the memorandum emphasizes, the needs of the state were to be primary, the lives and welfare of the refugees were secondary. (Although the documentary avoids the issue, this Zionist intransigence has important implications for the "failure to rescue" Jews charge leveled by the Zionists against various governments to extort reparations. It would appear that the Zionists were waved and stopped by their own example.) 

"The Anti-Semitic Side of Zionism", as an Israeli production, naturally does not challenge the mythical Holocaust. The "gas chamber" hoax is accepted at face value. Still, the production is an outstanding example of what Jews will discuss among themselves, in their real country, while fanatically suppressing the same information in the mainstream U.S. media they control. These facts, little known but historically well documented, would blow the minds of media indoctrinated Americans were they known. "The Anti-Semitic Side of Zionism", amazing as it is, is by no means an isolated example of Israeli productions. Ten years ago an Israeli journalist made a documentary entitled "In Search of the Khazars". The Khazars were, of course, the Finnish-Mongoloid Empire of south Russia /Eastern Europe who converted to Judaism in the Dark Ages. The film explores the long debated issue of whether Russian/Polish Jewry is descended from the Khazar Empire after its break up. Whatever one thinks of the theory, Zionist controlled U.S. TV would never allow such a production. 

The hidden history of Zionism goes into many verboten historical subjects. To return to Theodore Herzl, whose juicy quotations began "The Anti-Semitic Side of Zionism" it is well known that Herzl visualized anti-Semites and Zionists as natural allies. Indeed, Herzl stipulated in "Der Judenstaat" that Zionism could only succeed through its collaboration with anti-Semitic governments, who would be happy to assist Zionism in draining their countries of unwanted Jews. Chaim Weizmann, the prime mover behind the Balfour Declaration, said much the same thing. In his autobiography "Trial and Error", Weizmann declared that "whenever the number of Jews in any country exceeds the saturation point, that country reacts against them." He called it "a universal law of history which cannot be confused with anti-Semitism in the ordinary and vulgar sense." Jacob Klatzkin, another prominent Zionist, was even more blunt. He stated: "Instead of praising the philo-Semites who defend our rights, we should defend the anti-Semites who attack our rights. We are an alien presence in their midst." In actual practice, many anti-Semitic countries in Eastern Europe between the two world wars were quite eager to send their unwanted Jews to Palestine. Fascist regimes, and not just Nazi Germany, were eager to send emissaries to the Zionists. Beck and Lipski in Poland were always willing to export their Jews to accommodate Zionist demands. Betar, Jabotinsky's Revisionist-Zionist organization, flourished in Poland before the German invasion.  

"The Anti-Semitic Side of Zionism", naturally, cannot go into all the covered up aspects of Zionism. But it does enough to show that both Jewish, gentile and Christian-Zionist conceptions of the doctrine are fundamentally false. That is a gigantic step in the right direction. The fact that the exposure comes from an Israeli TV documentary helps defuse accusations of anti-Semitism and rewriting the historical record. The historical record does indeed need to be rewritten but by facts agreed to by all sides of the political spectrum. 
 
 
 


--

Being happy–is it good for the Jews? "Before Professor Dershowitz accused me of being an anti-Semite (news to me), I was a happy person. Since then, I'm still a happy person". –Michael Santomauro

An antisemite condemns people for being Jews, I am not an antisemite.--Michael Santomauro

Most of us are mentally trapped to think Jewish. Actually, it is safe to say that virtually every mainstream publication or or other type of media organ is "nothing more than a screen to present chosen views." The great battle over the last century has been a battle for the mind of the Western peoples, i.e., non-Jewish Euros. The chosen won it by acquiring control over essentially the complete mainstream news, information, education and entertainment media of every type, and using that control to infuse and disseminate their message, agenda and worldview, their way of thinking, or rather the way they want us to think. Since at least the 1960s this campaign has been effectively complete. Since then they have shaped and controlled the minds of all but a seeming few of us in varying degree with almost no opposition or competition from any alternative worldview. So now most of us are mentally trapped in the box the chosen have made for us, which we have lived in all our lives. Only a few have managed to avoid it or escape it, or to even sometimes see outside of it, and so actually "think outside of the (Jewish) box." --Michael Santomauro

Thank you and remember: 

Peace is patriotic!

Michael Santomauro
253 W. 72nd Street
New York, NY 10023

Call anytime: 917-974-6367

E-mail me anything:
ReporterNotebook@Gmail.com

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.


Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.


Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.

.

__,_._,___

Hate in Holy Land: Christians caught in Jewish-Muslim crossfire

 

Hate in Holy Land: Christians caught in Jewish-Muslim crossfire



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FdceGCc6FvU




--

Being happy–is it good for the Jews? "Before Professor Dershowitz accused me of being an anti-Semite (news to me), I was a happy person. Since then, I'm still a happy person". –Michael Santomauro

An antisemite condemns people for being Jews, I am not an antisemite.--Michael Santomauro

Most of us are mentally trapped to think Jewish. Actually, it is safe to say that virtually every mainstream publication or or other type of media organ is "nothing more than a screen to present chosen views." The great battle over the last century has been a battle for the mind of the Western peoples, i.e., non-Jewish Euros. The chosen won it by acquiring control over essentially the complete mainstream news, information, education and entertainment media of every type, and using that control to infuse and disseminate their message, agenda and worldview, their way of thinking, or rather the way they want us to think. Since at least the 1960s this campaign has been effectively complete. Since then they have shaped and controlled the minds of all but a seeming few of us in varying degree with almost no opposition or competition from any alternative worldview. So now most of us are mentally trapped in the box the chosen have made for us, which we have lived in all our lives. Only a few have managed to avoid it or escape it, or to even sometimes see outside of it, and so actually "think outside of the (Jewish) box." --Michael Santomauro

Thank you and remember: 

Peace is patriotic!

Michael Santomauro
253 W. 72nd Street
New York, NY 10023

Call anytime: 917-974-6367

E-mail me anything:
ReporterNotebook@Gmail.com

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___

The Anti-Semitic Side Of Zionism [1 Attachment]

 
[Attachment(s) from ReporterNotebook included below]

From: braveheart <billguru1@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 2:34 AM
Subject: The Anti-Semitic Side Of Zionism
To: billguru1@gmail.com


    THE ANTI-SEMITIC SIDE OF ZIONISM

 

An Israeli two hour documentary entitled "The Anti-Semitic Side of Zionism" explores the dark side of Theodore Herzl's conception of a Jewish state. It contains revealing information not known even to most revisionist students of the subject. Herzl expressed sentiments in his personal diary which would make even hardened anti-Semites blush. At one point in his private musings, Herzl fantasized about a mass conversion of Hungary's Jews in the cathedral of Saint Stephen to cure them of their Jewishness. The ceremony was to be blessed by the Pope. At another point, Herzl conceived the idea of an anti-Semitic crusader to strip the Jews of their wealth. After all, stated Herzl, do not all the governments of the world do the bidding of rich Jews? The film makers have a great deal of fun in beguiling Jews on the street with these Herzl quotations. The reactions range from anger at the blatant "anti-Semitism" to befuddlement when they are told that Herzl, not Hitler, made them. A similarly amusing moment comes when the director of the Jabotinsky Institute is read a Jabotinsky quotation that Eastern European Jews who wish to migrate to Eretz Israel shall have to shave their locks and beards and start behaving like normal human beings. He bleats that the opinions are blatantly anti-Semitic. When informed that Vladimir Jabotinsky himself made the statements, he blanches, calls it "impossible" and then asks for the reference – which is immediately provided. 

Aside from the humor and the ignorance of the Jewish public, the documentary has important lessons for students of history. It shows consistently the Social Darwinist nature of the doctrine. The European Jews consistently looked down on the Middle Eastern, oriental Jews and sought to "modernize" them to make them "suitable' Zionist material. The Zionist attitude toward Jewish refugees from Nazi occupied Europe was even more lamentable. As Ben-Gurion himself stated, if he had to choose between moving all the Jewish children in England to Israel and saving only half to build the Zionist state, he would sacrifice the children to the needs of the Israeli state. The documentary quotes from internal memorandum of the Jewish Agency for Palestine about how to distinguish between "acceptable" and "unacceptable" émigrés. The young, strong and healthy were preferred while the elderly and decrepit were expendable. Always, the memorandum emphasizes, the needs of the state were to be primary, the lives and welfare of the refugees were secondary. (Although the documentary avoids the issue, this Zionist intransigence has important implications for the "failure to rescue" Jews charge leveled by the Zionists against various governments to extort reparations. It would appear that the Zionists were waved and stopped by their own example.) 

"The Anti-Semitic Side of Zionism", as an Israeli production, naturally does not challenge the mythical Holocaust. The "gas chamber" hoax is accepted at face value. Still, the production is an outstanding example of what Jews will discuss among themselves, in their real country, while fanatically suppressing the same information in the mainstream U.S. media they control. These facts, little known but historically well documented, would blow the minds of media indoctrinated Americans were they known. "The Anti-Semitic Side of Zionism", amazing as it is, is by no means an isolated example of Israeli productions. Ten years ago an Israeli journalist made a documentary entitled "In Search of the Khazars". The Khazars were, of course, the Finnish-Mongoloid Empire of south Russia /Eastern Europe who converted to Judaism in the Dark Ages. The film explores the long debated issue of whether Russian/Polish Jewry is descended from the Khazar Empire after its break up. Whatever one thinks of the theory, Zionist controlled U.S. TV would never allow such a production. 

The hidden history of Zionism goes into many verboten historical subjects. To return to Theodore Herzl, whose juicy quotations began "The Anti-Semitic Side of Zionism" it is well known that Herzl visualized anti-Semites and Zionists as natural allies. Indeed, Herzl stipulated in "Der Judenstaat" that Zionism could only succeed through its collaboration with anti-Semitic governments, who would be happy to assist Zionism in draining their countries of unwanted Jews. Chaim Weizmann, the prime mover behind the Balfour Declaration, said much the same thing. In his autobiography "Trial and Error", Weizmann declared that "whenever the number of Jews in any country exceeds the saturation point, that country reacts against them." He called it "a universal law of history which cannot be confused with anti-Semitism in the ordinary and vulgar sense." Jacob Klatzkin, another prominent Zionist, was even more blunt. He stated: "Instead of praising the philo-Semites who defend our rights, we should defend the anti-Semites who attack our rights. We are an alien presence in their midst." In actual practice, many anti-Semitic countries in Eastern Europe between the two world wars were quite eager to send their unwanted Jews to Palestine. Fascist regimes, and not just Nazi Germany, were eager to send emissaries to the Zionists. Beck and Lipski in Poland were always willing to export their Jews to accommodate Zionist demands. Betar, Jabotinsky's Revisionist-Zionist organization, flourished in Poland before the German invasion.  

"The Anti-Semitic Side of Zionism", naturally, cannot go into all the covered up aspects of Zionism. But it does enough to show that both Jewish, gentile and Christian-Zionist conceptions of the doctrine are fundamentally false. That is a gigantic step in the right direction. He fact that the exposure comes from an Israeli TV documentary helps defuse accusations of anti-Semitism and rewriting the historical record. The historical record does indeed need to be rewritten but by facts agreed to by all sides of the political spectrum. 
 
 
 

__._,_.___

Attachment(s) from ReporterNotebook

1 of 1 File(s)

Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.


Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.


Find useful articles and helpful tips on living with Fibromyalgia. Visit the Fibromyalgia Zone today!

.

__,_._,___

Nov 13, 2010

The fate of Christians in Iraq

 


Subject: The fate of Christians in Iraq

Hello Michael,


Talking about unpleasant TV appearances, George W. Bush, like a stubborn ghost will not be exorcised.
I would like to call attention to the plight of Iraqi Christians, a people who were living in country we know as Iraq almost two thousand years before the British invented it and even hundreds of years before Islam itself was invented. 
Soon, Iraqi Christians will not longer live in Iraq but on the margins of history. They will be either dead or gone forever to exile in other lands.

This is another dastardly consequence of Bush's depraved and callous destruction of Iraq under all kinds of lies and false pretenses. Other accomplices in the same Lilliputian scale of morals as Bush seconded, aided, abetted and gave material support to the evil enterprise. Tony Blair comes foremost to mind. He was treated like an errand boy by none other that one of the most notorious ignoramus ever to occupy the Oval Office, yet Tony took it all in stride for the dubious privilege of basking in the cheap reflected glory of this moral and intellectual dwarf who Americans, in their exemplary exercise of what is brandished as "democracy" (Reagan's Miracle), elected twice as their national leader and representative to the rest of the world.

===================================================
The Guardian news article:

 


http://www.jta.org/news/article/2010/11/11/2741707/cantor-tells-netanyahu-gop-will-check-obama  (Jewish Telegraph Agency wire)

GOP will 'check' Obama, Cantor tells Netanyahu

November 11, 2010

WASHINGTON (JTA) -- The new GOP majority will "serve as a check" on the Obama administration, Republican leader Eric Cantor told Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Netanyahu met Wednesday night with Cantor (R-Va.), the putative U.S. House of Representatives majority leader (Cantor) whose party swept midterm elections last week for the House. 

Their meeting was first reported on the Politico website.

Such meetings with opposition leaders are unusual, and Cantor's office cast it as a get-together between two men with a longstanding relationship.

Nonetheless, Cantor's statement was critical of the Obama administration, siding with Netanyahu in a number of areas where the prime minister and President Obama have differences.

The statement called on Obama to "fully and aggressively implement" Iran sanctions and to "make it absolutely clear that the U.S. will veto any effort by the Palestinians" to declare a state unilaterally. Cantor told Netanyahu, the statement added, that "the new Republican majority will serve as a check on the Administration and what has been, up until this point, one-party rule in Washington."

Although Obama has not used the full sanctions package, he has implemented Iran sanctions to a greater extent than any of his predecessors.

Cantor was deputy Republican whip from 2003 to 2007, when Republicans controlled both houses of Congress and the White House, and the Bush administration considerably softened proposed Iran sanctions packages.

Obama also has made it clear that he opposes unilateral moves in the peace talks, although he has not explicitly threatened to veto Palestinian statehood should it come under consideration by the U.N. Security Council.

Netanyahu also met Thursday with U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, who has said that an announcement this week of more than 1,000 new housing units in eastern Jerusalem is "counterproductive."

"I'm very pleased to be here and to have this opportunity to discuss with him how we're going to move forward in the process," Clinton said prior to the meeting.

Netanyahu also met with Vice President Joe Biden during his U.S. visit, and with Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), whom he has known since the early 1980s.
 


--

Being happy–is it good for the Jews? "Before Professor Dershowitz accused me of being an anti-Semite (news to me), I was a happy person. Since then, I'm still a happy person". –Michael Santomauro

An antisemite condemns people for being Jews, I am not an antisemite.--Michael Santomauro

Most of us are mentally trapped to think Jewish. Actually, it is safe to say that virtually every mainstream publication or or other type of media organ is "nothing more than a screen to present chosen views." The great battle over the last century has been a battle for the mind of the Western peoples, i.e., non-Jewish Euros. The chosen won it by acquiring control over essentially the complete mainstream news, information, education and entertainment media of every type, and using that control to infuse and disseminate their message, agenda and worldview, their way of thinking, or rather the way they want us to think. Since at least the 1960s this campaign has been effectively complete. Since then they have shaped and controlled the minds of all but a seeming few of us in varying degree with almost no opposition or competition from any alternative worldview. So now most of us are mentally trapped in the box the chosen have made for us, which we have lived in all our lives. Only a few have managed to avoid it or escape it, or to even sometimes see outside of it, and so actually "think outside of the (Jewish) box." --Michael Santomauro

Thank you and remember: 

Peace is patriotic!

Michael Santomauro
253 W. 72nd Street
New York, NY 10023

Call anytime: 917-974-6367

E-mail me anything:
ReporterNotebook@Gmail.com

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Find useful articles and helpful tips on living with Fibromyalgia. Visit the Fibromyalgia Zone today!


Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.


Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.

.

__,_._,___

Legacy of George W. Bush

 



This is the guy who, not even a month after the Towers came down, looked into a television camera and said, "We need to counter the shockwave of the evildoer by having individual rate cuts accelerated and by thinking about tax rebates."


A Small Fraction of a Man
Saturday 13 November 2010

by: William Rivers Pitt, t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed

George W. Bush was all over my television this past week, all over the newspapers, and the feelings inspired by his sudden reappearance are almost beyond my capacity to describe. There was the story about his hearty approval of waterboarding. There was the story that had him contemplating dropping Dick Cheney from the administration. There was the story that had him describing himself as a "dissenter" on the Iraq invasion. He did interviews, and excerpts of his new book dribbled out, and it was all too much to endure.

This is the guy, I thought to myself when I saw his face or heard his voice. This is the guy.

This is the guy who took a massive Clinton administration budget surplus and gave it away to his friends at the top of the tax bracket, a move that laid the groundwork for our current economic calamity.

This is the guy who breezed past a pointed warning about Osama bin Laden, terrorism and airplanes on August 8, 2001, because he was on vacation and couldn't be bothered.

This is the guy who parlayed that massive failure into a constant goad of fear to be wielded with impunity against the people he purported to lead. Plastic sheeting and duct tape, anthrax under your pillow, and of course, weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

This is the guy who, not even a month after the Towers came down, looked into a television camera and said, "We need to counter the shockwave of the evildoer by having individual rate cuts accelerated and by thinking about tax rebates."

Oh yes, this is the guy who stood before the American people in January of 2003 and proclaimed that Iraq was in possession of 26,000 liters of anthrax, 38,000 liters of botulinum toxin, 500 tons of sarin, mustard and VX gas, mobile biological weapons labs, uranium from Niger for use in a "robust" nuclear weapons programs, and that Iraq enjoyed connections to al Qaeda that led directly to the attacks of September 11.

This was the guy who presided over the outing of a deep-cover CIA agent after her husband had the temerity to call him a liar in the public prints. That agent was running a network for the purpose of thwarting any person or group that might try to deliver weapons of mass destruction to terrorists.

This is the guy who strutted like a bantam rooster under a banner reading "Mission Accomplished," bragging about the end of a war that was to grind on for seven more years, and grinds on even to this day, and tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow.

This is the guy who said "Bring it on" and put a target on the backs of tens of thousands of US troops. This is the guy who is personally responsible for the death and injury of hundreds of thousands of innocent human beings. The body count from his administration is breathtaking in size and scope.

This is the guy who allowed the intelligence services of this nation to violate the Constitutional rights of its citizens in a way never seen before.

This is the guy who turned the entire world against America after that same world embraced us so completely after September 11. World leaders could not stand to be in the same room with him, and openly mocked him, thus humiliating us all.

This is the guy who literally fiddled while Hurricane Katrina devoured the city of New Orleans.

This guy actually said he considered dropping Cheney from the administration? It would be comic if it were not so pointedly fraudulent. Cheney ran the government, ran roughshod over every right he found meddlesome, and Bush sat by and let him do it with that same simpering smirk on his face.

This is the guy who set stem cell research back more than a decade because of his overarching fealty to "snowflake babies" over living, breathing, suffering people.

This is the guy who unleashed all the horrors of the torture chamber because the lawyers said it was OK. If the president does it, it's not illegal, right? Nixon came up with that line, but this is the guy who took it farther than it has ever been taken before.

This is the guy, and now he's back on my television again, and it makes me want to eat my own teeth. I endured him for eight long, brutal years, and have often thought since that no matter how bad things get - and they have, indeed, gotten pretty damned bad - I don't have to endure his face or his voice or his abject serial failures anymore.

But now he's back, and it is like returning to a nightmare.

I don't know what this George W. Bush Reputation Rehabilitation Tour will actually accomplish in the end. The same 20% of the country that kept his approval ratings from slipping into single digits - said group now being known as the "Tea Party" - will go out and buy his book. They will lap up his mealy-mouthed pabulum like cats into the cream, and some of our "mainstream" commentators will try to shoehorn the idea that he is missed into the national conversation.

He is not. George W. Bush was, and likely will forever be, the single worst American president in the nation's history. To outstrip his remarkable record of failure, criminality and disgrace, a future president will have to personally cause the Earth to crash into the sun.

All I can do for now is avoid the TV, stay away from the newspapers, and pray to God on High that this small fraction of a man will soon retreat back into the ignominy from which he has emerged. There is no salvaging him, and thanks to him, there may be no salvaging America in his aftermath.

We are all children of this bastard fool now. The least he can do is stay in the shadows where he belongs, while we toil and sweat to repair what he wrought. 

88x31.png
This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.




-- 

Peace.

Michael Santomauro
253 W. 72nd Street
New York, NY 10023

Call anytime: 917-974-6367

E-mail me anything:
ReporterNotebook@Gmail.com

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___