Translate

Dec 8, 2010

Benjamin Netanyahu: "threat to the character of [the] country,"

 


Four days after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced plans to place thousands of migrant workers from Africa and Southeast Asia in aprison camp deep in the Negev Desert because, as he claimed, they pose a "threat to the character of [the] country," a burning tree trunk fell into a bus full of Israeli Prison Service cadets, killing forty passengers. The tree was among hundreds of thousands turned to ash by the forest fire pouring across northern Israel, and which now threatens to engulf outskirts of Haifa, Israel's third-largest city. Over the last four days, more than 12,300 acres have burned in the Mount Carmel area, a devastating swath of destruction in a country the size of New Jersey. While the cause of the fire has not been established, it has laid bare the myths of Israel's foundation.

Peace.
Michael Santomauro 
@ 917-974-6367 

What sort of TRUTH is it that crushes the freedom to seek the truth?

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___

Posen Speech

 

Dec. 8, 2010
Dear friend,

Re: Posen Speech

LINK for Prof. Butz of Northwestern University on the topic for the "Posen Speech":

Arthur R. Butz: The Hoax of the Twentieth Century: The Case Against the Presumed Extermination of European Jewry

http://www.vho.org/cgi-bin/perlfect/search/search.pl?q=posen%20speech&showurl=%2FGB%2FBooks%2Fthottc%2F10.html

Excerpt:

In the cross examination prosecutor Petersen played a phonograph recording of somebody speaking the first lines of the alleged speech, but Berger at first denied that the voice was Himmler's and then, after a second playing of the same lines, he said that it "might be Heinrich Himmler's voice." The records were then offered in evidence and more excerpts, including the one dealing with Jewish evacuation,… were played in court. Berger was not questioned further, however, on the authenticity of the voice and was excused immediately after the playing of the records. It was only with some reluctance that the court accepted these records in evidence:

"Judge Powers, Presiding: Well, I think that there is enough evidence here, prima facie, that the voice is the voice of Himmler to justify receiving the document in evidence. There is no evidence, however, that it was delivered at Poznan or any other particular place. The discs will be received in evidence as an indication of Himmler's general attitude."

The only "prima facie" evidence for the authenticity of the voice (at only one point in the speech), as far as I can see, was the Berger statement at one point that the voice "might be Heinrich Himmler's."

Read more from Chapter 6 of Prof. Butz's book, from the LINK above


Peace.

Michael Santomauro
Editorial Director
ReporterNotebook@gmail.com
917-974-6367






__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.


Be a homeroom hero! Help Yahoo! donate up to $350K to classrooms!


Find useful articles and helpful tips on living with Fibromyalgia. Visit the Fibromyalgia Zone today!

.

__,_._,___

"Threat to the character of [the] country,"-- Netanyahu on migrant workers from Africa and Southeast Asia

 

This is the print preview: Back to normal view »

Max Blumenthal

Posted: December 8, 2010 02:32 PM

"When I look out my window today and see a tree standing there, that tree gives me a greater sense of beauty and personal delight than all the vast forests I have seen in Switzerland or Scandinavia. Because every tree here was planted by us." ~ David Ben Gurion, Memoirs

"Why are there so many Arabs here? Why didn't you chase them away?" ~ David Ben Gurion during a visit to Nazareth, July 1948

Four days after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced plans to place thousands of migrant workers from Africa and Southeast Asia in a prison camp deep in the Negev Desert because, as he claimed, they pose a "threat to the character of [the] country," a burning tree trunk fell into a bus full of Israeli Prison Service cadets, killing forty passengers. The tree was among hundreds of thousands turned to ash by the forest fire pouring across northern Israel, and which now threatens to engulf outskirts of Haifa, Israel's third-largest city. Over the last four days, more than 12,300 acres have burned in the Mount Carmel area, a devastating swath of destruction in a country the size of New Jersey. While the cause of the fire has not been established, it has laid bare the myths of Israel's foundation.

Israelis are treating the fire as one of their greatest tragedies in recent years. A friend who grew up in the Haifa area told me over the weekend that he was devastated by the images of destruction he saw on TV. His friend's brother was among those who perished in the bus accident. Though he is a dedicated Zionist who supported Netanyahu's election bid in 2008, like so many Israelis, he was furious at the response -- or lack of one -- by the government. "Our leaders are complete idiots, but you already know that," he told me. "They invested so much to prepare for all kinds of crazy war scenarios but didn't do anything to protect civilians from the basic things you are supposed to take for granted."

On 3 December, Netanyahu informed the country, "We do not have what it takes to put out the fire, but help is on the way." To beat back the blaze, Bibi has had to beg for assistance from his counterpart in Turkey, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the Western-backed Palestinian Authority and Israel's American and British patrons. Israel is a wealthy country which boasts to the world about its innovative spirit -- its US-based lobbyists market it as a "Start-Up Nation"-- but its performance during the forest fire revealed the sad truth: its government has prioritized offensive military capacity and occupation maintenance so extensively that it has completely neglected the country's infrastructure, emergency preparedness and most of all, the general welfare of its citizens.

Beyond the embarrassing spectacle of Turkish supply planes landing in Tel Aviv just six months after Israeli commandos massacred Turkish aid volunteers on the Gaza Freedom Flotilla, or the confessions of impotence by the hard-men Netanyahu and Avigdor Lieberman, the fire exposed a terrible history that had been concealed by layers of official mythology and piles of fallen pine needles.

"There are no facts"

Among the towns that have been evacuated is Ein Hod, a bohemian artists' colony nestled in the hills to the north and east of Haifa. This is not the first time Ein Hod was evacuated, however. The first time was in 1948, when the town's original Palestinian inhabitants were driven from their homes by a man-made disaster known as the Nakba.

Most of the original inhabitants of Ein Hod, which was called Ayn Hawd prior to the expulsions of '48, and was continuously populated since the 12th century, were expelled to refugee camps in Jordan and Jenin in the West Bank. But a small and exceptionally resilient band of residents fled to the hills, set up a makeshift camp and watched as Jewish foreigners moved into their homes.

In 1953, a Romanian Dadaist sculptor named Marcel Janco convinced the army not to bulldoze Ein Hod as it did the scores of nearby Palestinian towns it had ethnically cleansed five years prior. He proposed establishing an art commune to generate tourism and contribute to the culture of Zionism. Today, the rustic stone homes that once belonged to Palestinians are quaint artist studios, while the village mosque has been converted into an airy bar called Bonanza. Visitors to the town are greeted at the entrance by Benjamin Levy's "The Modest Couple in a Sardine Can," a sculpture depicting a nude woman and a suited gentleman in a sardine can, which was unveiled by Israeli President Shimon Peres in 2001.

After the catastrophe of 1948, the original Palestinians of Ayn Hawd set up their own village three kilometers away from what is today known as Eid Hod. For decades the villagers resisted attempts to dispossess them and were surrounded by a fence during the 1970s to prevent them from expanding according to natural growth. But they finally won official recognition in 2005. This meant that for the first time since the establishment of Israel they could receive electricity and trash service. Meanwhile, more than forty other Palestinian villages inside Israel remain "unrecognized." The 80,000 or so residents of the villages, which lay mostly in the Negev desert, are tax-paying citizens of Israel. However, they have few rights; their homes are routinely demolished to make way for Jewish settlements and they are deprived of basic services.

I visited both Ein Hod and Ayn Hawd in June. When the residents of the Jewish village Ein Hod saw me filming, they reacted with a mixture of suspicion and hostility. "I know what you're doing!" an elderly woman sneered at me, insisting that I not film her. Inside the bar, I asked patrons if the place was in fact a converted mosque. "Yeah, but that's how all of Israel is," a woman from a nearby kibbutz told me as she sipped on a beer. "This whole country is built on top of Arab villages. So maybe it's best to let bygones be bygones."

I provoked another annoyed reaction when I began filming a tour guide leading a group of elderly Israelis around the village. Speaking in Hebrew, the guide told the tourists as she took them through the art studios that they were inside "third generation houses" -- forget the Arabs who lived in them for hundreds of years. In the studios I noticed that much of the art being produced was Judaica kitsch for sale to foreign tourists -- generic shtetl scenes from the long lost, distant world immortalized in films like Fiddler on the Roof.

Later, before taking her group to the town's Hurdy Gurdy museum, the guide mentioned a "welcoming committee" that vetted potential residents. Presumably this was how Ein Hod kept the pesky Arabs down the road from returning home. That and the Absentee Property Law of 1950 which placed all "abandoned" Arab property in the hands of the Jewish National Fund and the Israeli Land Administration, a provision that consolidated what the exiled Palestinian member of the Israeli parliament Azmi Bishara called "the largest armed robbery in history."

During a break, the tour guide pulled me aside and demanded to know who I was. It was clear the villagers had grown wary of curious outsiders. Introducing herself as Shuli Linda Yarkon, a PhD candidate at Tel Aviv University, the tour guide told me she was the leading authority on Ein Hod. She said I had to allow her to review all the footage I shot, claiming that this would ensure that I not mistranslate words she used like kibbush, a Hebrew term that means "conquest" but is commonly used to refer to the occupation of Palestine.

"So what about the conquest you mentioned?" I asked her. "Why didn't you tell the tourists who lived in the houses before 1948?" Visibly irritated, Yarkon remarked, "I've concluded after years of research that there are really no facts when you discuss this issue. There are only narratives." She assured me that Ein Hod's Jewish population maintained excellent relations with the expelled residents: "Go ask them. They will tell you how they feel."

So I did. After following a winding dirt road around a hillside for several kilometers, I was inside Ayn Hawd, the Palestinian village. There was no installation art here, just ramshackle houses, dirt roads, a mosque with a tall minaret and lots of kids playing in the streets. Almost immediately some of the town's residents appeared from their homes to greet me. Abu al-Hisa Moein, a village council member and schoolteacher, invited me to spend the rest of the afternoon with his family on a patio beside his home, which appeared newer and more stately than those of his neighbors. He told me his ancestors arrived in the village more than 700 years ago from what is now Iraq. His relatives who were expelled to Jenin in 1948 told him they would be too angry to even lay eyes their former homes with the new occupants inside. When I mentioned the bar built into the old mosque, Moein shook his head in disgust. "It's very bad. It's an insult," he said.

Moein took me inside his home for a tour, showing me the spacious, immaculately clean parlor and the picture window with a sweeping view of the valley below. He had built the whole place, he said with pride. Down a hall, his 13-year-old daughter, Ansam, was reclining on the floor of her room reading John Knowles' classic bildungsroman,A Separate Peace. She leapt to attention when I entered and spent the next ten minutes showing me her library of literature. With night setting in, Moein and his family took me back on the patio. There, he unfurled a map of Mandate-era Palestine and ran his fingers over the names of scores of villages destroyed on the coast between Jaffa and Haifa by Zionist forces in 1948. He pointed to towns like Kafr Saba, Qaqun, al-Tira and Tantura, the site of a horrific massacre of unarmed Palestinian prisoners on the beach just one month after the Deir Yassin massacre. Moein was a history teacher, but Israel had forbidden him from discussing these events in his classroom, and is in the process of criminalizing any public observance of them.

As darkness blanketed the hills, I realized that I had lost track of time. I told Moein that I needed to get back to Tel Aviv. With that, his wife rushed into the house and gathered a bundle of grapes she had picked from a tree in the family's yard, packing it for me in some tupperware from their kitchen. Then Moein walked me to my car and hugged me goodbye.

Redeeming the land

By now, both Ein Hod and Ayd Hawd are nearly empty. Most of their residents have fled for safer ground while the thousands of pine trees planted to provide Ein Hod's artists with a sense of solitude are reduced to ash. As the trees burn, the fire exposes another dimension of Israel's foundation that it has attempted to bury.

The pine trees themselves were instruments of concealment, strategically planted by the Jewish National Fund (JNF) on the sites of the hundreds of Palestinian villages the Zionist militias evacuated and destroyed in 1948. With forests sprouting up where towns once stood, those who had been expelled would have nothing to come back to. Meanwhile, to outsiders beholding the strangely Alpine landscape of northern Israel for the first time, it seemed as though the Palestinians had never existed. And that was exactly the impression the JNF intended to create. The practice that David Ben Gurion and other prominent Zionists referred to as "redeeming the land" was in fact the ultimate form of greenwashing.

The Carmel fire is burning JNF trees planted over destroyed Palestinian villages

Described by Israeli historian Ilan Pappe as "the quintessential Zionist colonialist," the first director of the JNF, Yossef Weitz, was a ruthless ideologue who helped orchestrate the mass expulsion of Palestinians in 1948. Weitz notoriously declared "It must be clear that there is no room in the country for both peoples ... If the Arabs leave it, the country will become wide and spacious for us ... The only solution is a Land of Israel ... without Arabs ... There is no way but to transfer the Arabs from here to the neighboring countries, to transfer all of them, save perhaps for [the Palestinian Arabs of] Bethlehem, Nazareth and the old Jerusalem. Not one village must be left, not one tribe."

After Weitz's wishes were fulfilled, the JNF planted hundreds of thousands of trees over freshly destroyed Palestinian villages like al-Tira, helping to establish the Carmel National Park. An area on the south slope of Mount Carmel so closely resembled the landscape of the Swiss Alps that it was nicknamed "Little Switzerland." Of course, the non-indigenous trees of the JNF were poorly suited to the environment in Palestine. Most of the saplings the JNF plants at a site near Jerusalem simply do not survive, and require frequent replanting. Elsewhere, needles from the pine trees have killed native plant species and wreaked havoc on the ecosystem. And as we have seen with the Carmel wildfire, the JNF's trees go up like tinder in the dry heat.

But it seems that nothing can stop the JNF's drive to "green" the land. Even in the parched Negev desert, the JNF is advancing plans to plant one million trees in a plot called "GOD TV Forest." To accomplish the highly unusual feat of foresting a desert, the Israel Land Administration has ordered the expulsion of the Bedouin unrecognized village of al-Araqib, home to hundreds of Israeli citizens who have lived in the area for more than 100 years and who have served in the army's frontline tracker units.

The Israeli government has tried time and again to force the people of al-Araqib into an American Indian reservation-style "development town," but they have refused. The village has been razed to the ground by bulldozerson eight occasions, but each time the residents have rebuilt their homes, hoping to outlast a ruthless campaign to destroy their way of life.

What about the strange name for the proposed forest? It is a reference to GOD TV, a radical right-wing evangelical Christian broadcasting network that hosts faith-based fraudsters like Creflo Dollar and rapture-ready fanatics like Rory and Wendy Alec.

And why is GOD TV bankrolling the JNF's ethnic cleansing campaign in the Negev desert? According to itswebsite, "GOD TV is planting over ONE MILLION TREES across the Holy Land as a miraculous sign to Israel and to the world that Jesus is coming soon."

In his 1970 short fiction story "Facing the Forest," the famed Israeli author A.B. Yehoshua portrayed a mute Palestinian forest watchman who burns down a JNF forest to reveal the hidden ruins of his former village. Forty years later, as the JNF forests around Mount Carmel burn, right-wing Israeli lawmakers have demanded a search for the Arab who must have sparked the blaze, even though there is no firm evidence about the cause of the fire. Michael Ben Ari, a extremist Member of Knesset from the National Union Party, called for "the whole Shin Bet" -- Israel's domestic intelligence agency -- to be mobilized to investigate what the right-wing media outlet Arutz Sheva said "may turn out to be the worst terror attack in Israel's history."

Follow Max Blumenthal on Twitter: www.twitter.com/MaxBlumenthal

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___

‘Voice’ Considers Bad Orthodox Landlords - by Marc Tracy > Tablet Magazine - A New Read on Jewish Life

 

http://www.tabletmag.com/scroll/52628/%e2%80%98voice%e2%80%99-considers-bad-orthodox-landlords/

Peace.
Michael Santomauro
@ 917-974-6367

What sort of TRUTH is it that crushes the freedom to seek the truth?

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Be a homeroom hero! Help Yahoo! donate up to $350K to classrooms!


Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.


Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.

.

__,_._,___

Thunder over Holocaust revisionism

 



Minister slams student thesis on Holocaust education

December 08, 2010

Daniel Dale

Ontario citizenship and immigration minister Eric Hoskins said Tuesday that he was "greatly disturbed and in fact disgusted" to read about a University of Toronto master's thesis that calls two Holocaust education programs "racist."

The thesis criticizes the March of the Living, on which young Jews and Holocaust survivors travel to Poland and Israel, and the March of Remembrance and Hope, on which non-Jews and survivors go to Germany and Poland. It was written by Coalition Against Israeli Apartheid activist Jenny Peto, who is Jewish.

The thesis was discussed in the Legislature after it was debated in the Star. Hoskins was responding to Progressive Conservative MPP Steve Clark, who called the thesis "disgusting." PC MPP Peter Shurman, whose Thornhill riding includes a large Jewish population, said the thesis was a hateful, poorly researched "piece of garbage."

According to Peto, the programs were designed to foster a sense of Jewish victimhood and generate support for Israel. The March of Remembrance and Hope, however, is run by the non-Jewish Canadian Centre for Diversity. The CCD and the March of the Living said the thesis was littered with errors.

Peto, 29, said the politicians' criticisms merely reflected their own biases. "First they condemn Israeli Apartheid Week, then they condemn a Jewish student criticizing her own community. What's next? Are they going to start burning books and arresting people because they speak out against Israel?"

U of T provost Cheryl Nisak said she has been "a little alarmed at the kinds of things being said about a piece of student work."

"It would be a good idea for us all to remember that it's a student paper," she said Tuesday. "I don't know this student, but I certainly wouldn't want to see this kind of scrutiny and unhappy attention on students in general."





__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.


Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.


Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.

.

__,_._,___

James Damon: Days 2 and 3 of Sylvia Stolz's Disbarment Appeal

 

From: James Damon <jamesmdamon@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:43 PM


Berufungsverfahren Sylvia Stolz vor dem Bayerischen Anwaltsgerichtshof München
Tage 2 und 3
Days 2 and 3 of Sylvia Stolz's Appeal Trial Before the Bavarian Disciplinary Court for Attorneys

Written by Markus Haverkamp
Translated by J M Damon
The original German follows the translation

Markus Haverkamp's report on Day 1 is posted at
<michaelsantomauro.blogspot.com/.../sylvia-stolz-appealing-disbarment.html>

Today (2nd December 2010) was the second day of Sylvia Stolz's appeal to revoke the five-year provisional disbarment that was imposed on her in 2008.
Unlike the first day (16 November) today's proceedings took place not in the courthouse on Prielmeyer Street, but rather at 139 Schleißheimer Street.
The public was not informed of the change of address, nor was Sylvia's mother, or even her attorney Ludwig Bock, who drove all the way from Mannheim to find the Prielmeyer Courtroom completely empty.
There was not even a notice on the door to impart this vital information.
No one knew about the change of address except the porter.
Such incredible slovenliness, unheard-of in a European court of law, could hardly be inadvertent!

When Attorney Bock finally arrived at the correct address he filed a complaint against the Judicial Senate of Attorneys and Judges, for denying the public access to judicial proceedings.
The Senate conferred for an hour and then adjourned until 10 am tomorrow, 3 December, when it will again meet at the Schleißheimer address.  
Attorney Back, who was not prepared to remain overnight, drove back to Mannheim (360 kilometers).
He will have to make the long trip again tomorrow morning.

We do not know whether such chaos was intentionally created by the Senate or not.
Whether intentional or inadvertent, it is monstrous.
Sylvia must remain here in the Stadelheim women's jail rather than in Aichach, which is a great disruption and distraction for her (for example, she cannot receive mail at Stadelheim.)
The Senate designated an additional trial date for 17 December.

Markus Haverkamp
Munich

****************

Day 3

Today, 3 December 2010, I was unable to travel to Munich.
I am grateful to a close friend for the following report of the third day of Sylvia Stolz's appeal.
Like yesterday, today's proceedings, took place at 139 Schleißheimer Street.
Strict security measures were imposed on the small number of spectators, as though the government had reason to fear a "terrorist" attack.
Because of inclement weather, the trial did not begin until 10:30.
Three uniformed police officers were present as well as two plainclothesmen, in addition to two officials from Stadelheim Prison.

The first item was Attorney Ludwig Bock's complaint, which led to a great deal of hair-splitting and the usual verbal tug-of-war.
Bock emphasized that the public had been excluded from judicial proceedings, since the location of the trial had not been made public.
Presiding Attorney Lutz sarcastically replied that anybody could find out where the Court was meeting, to which Bock countered that this was clearly impossible since the Munich judiciary has a very large number of addresses (The City of Munich alone comprises two district courts.)

Sylvia was allowed to continue her presentation at 11:30.
She began by speaking about Germany's loss of freedom and continuing occupation, as well as related topics.
Then she depicted how in the Zündel trial she had not been allowed to carry out her duty of defending her client by presenting evidence that would have exonerated him.
She emphasized the fact that every defense attorney who violates the judicial ban on submitting evidence in "Holocaust" trials is automatically incriminating himself or herself, as occurred in her case.
Her inclusion of details made her presentation rather lengthy, which led to an admonishment by Presiding Attorney Lutz.
He said that she would no longer be allowed to read prepared materials, whereupon Attorney Bock pointed out that Lutz should have made this stipulation on the first day of the trial.
(The complexity and extent of the charges contained in Sylvia's indictment make such reading unavoidable.
To ban it would be extremely disadvantageous to her and would greatly detract from her presentation!)

After Sylvia had spoken until 1:00 pm the proceedings were adjourned and new trial dates were set.
The trial will be continued at 10:00 am on 17 December, 1:00 pm on 22 December, and then at 10:00 am 10 January 2011, always at 139 Schleißheimer Street.

Markus Haverkamp

****************


Berufungsverfahren Sylvia Stolz vor dem Bayerischen Anwaltsgerichtshof München

Heute war der zweite Prozeßtag gegen Sylvia Stolz im Rahmen ihrer Berufung gegen das über sie verhängte vorläufige Berufsverbot von fünf Jahren, aus dem Jahre 2008.

Die heutige Verhandlung fand nicht wie letztens in der Prielmeyerstraße statt, sondern in der Schleißheimer Straße 139. Dies war nicht nur der Öffentlichkeit, wie auch Stolzens Mutter unbekannt, sondern auch Sylvias Anwalt, Ludwig Bock, der den weiten Weg von Mannheim gefahren war und sich plötzlich vor dem leeren Saal 336 fand. Es befand sich vor dem Saal auch kein Aushang im Schaukasten, der diesbezügliche Informationen enthielt. Noch wußte der Pförtner Bescheid – eine unglaubliche Schlamperei!

Nachdem Ludwig Bock sich dann doch unter Verspätung an der richtigen Adresse einfand, legte er Beschwerde gegen den Senat ein, vermutlich zur Tatsache, daß durch dieses Vorgehen die Öffentlichkeit ausgeschlossen werde. Nachdem der Senat eine Stunde beratschlagt hatte, wurde das Verfahren ausgesetzt auf morgen, den 03.12. in der Schleißheimer Straße um 10.00 Uhr. RA Bock, der auf eine Übernachtung nicht eingestellt war fuhr nach Mannheim zurück (ca. 360 km), und wird morgen wieder anreisen müssen.

Ob dieses Chaos vom Senat beabsichtigt war oder nicht, kann ich nicht beurteilen. Eine Ungeheuerlichkeit ist es jedoch allemal. Sylvia Stolz verbringt den Zeitraum dieses Verfahrens im Frauengefängnis Stadelheim und nicht wie gewohnt in Aichach. Dies führt zu weiteren Belastungen für sie, z.B. beim Empfangen von Post. Ein weiterer Termin ist für den 17.12 anberaumt.

Markus Haverkamp

****************

Berufungsverfahren Sylvia Stolz vor dem Bayerischen Anwaltsgerichtshof München, am 03.12.10

Heute war der dritte Prozeßtag gegen Sylvia Stolz im Rahmen ihrer Berufung gegen das über sie verhängte vorläufige Berufsverbot von fünf Jahren, aus dem Jahre 2008.

Die heutige Verhandlung fand wie gestern in der Schleißheimer Straße 139 statt. Nach strengen Kontrollen der aus wenigen Leuten bestehenden Öffentlichkeit begann das Verfahren erst um 10.30 wegen Verspätungen auf Grund widriger Witterungsverhältnisse. Anwesend waren auch drei uniformierte Polizisten, zwei in Zivil gekleidete Beamten und zwei Justizbeamten aus der JVA Stadelheim. Zu Beginn wurde die Rüge von Ludwig Bock behandelt. Dies führte zur Wortklauberei und dem üblichen Hin-und-Her. Insbesondere monierte RA Bock, daß da nicht bekannt sei wo die Verhandlung stattfinde die Öffentlichkeit quasi ausgeschlossen sei. Auf den Einwand des Vorsitzenden, daß ein jeder sich ja informieren könne, erwiderte Bock, daß dies kaum möglich sei, da die Justiz in München über enorm viele Stellen verfüge (München hat allein schon zwei Landgerichte).

Um 11.30 konnte Sylvia Stolz dann mit ihrer Einlassung zur Sache fortfahren. Sie sprach ausführlich über den Verlust der Freiheit, über die Besetzung Deutschlands und dergleichen. Frau Stolz machte desweiteren Ausführungen zum Beweis- und Verteidigungsverbot beim Zündel-Prozeß und verwies auf die Tatsache, daß wer als Verteidiger gegen dieses Verbot bei Holocaust-Prozessen verstoße selbst angeklagt werde, wie es bei ihr dann auch der Fall war. Auf Grund der Fülle an Details war ihre Ausführung recht langatmig, was zu einer Ermahnung vom Vorsitzenden RA Lutz führte. Auch ermahnte Franz Lutz Sylvia Stolz, daß sie nicht ablesen dürfe worauf RA Bock den Senatsvorsitzenden darauf hinwies, daß er diese Ermahnung schon direkt am ersten Verhandlungstag hätte machen können. (Ob der Komplexität und des Umfanges des Themas ist man zum Vorlesen geradezu gezwungen! Dies zu verbieten würde Sylvia stark benachteiligen und ihre Einlassung empfindlich stören.) Nachdem Frau Stolz bis 13.00 vorgetragen hatte wurde die Verhandlung vertagt und neue Termine festgelegt.

Das Verfahren wird fortgeführt am 17.12 um 10.00 Uhr, dann am 22.12 um 13.00 Uhr und am 10.01.11 um 10.00 Uhr, jeweils in der Schleißheimer Straße 139. Da ich am heutigen Verfahren nicht teilnehmen konnte, verdanke ich diese Informationen einem Kameraden aus München.

Markus Haverkamp


****************

Here's freedom to him who would speak,
Here's freedom to him who would write;
For there's none ever feared that the truth should be heard,
Save him whom the truth would indict!
ROBERT BURNS (1759–96)






--

Being happy–is it good for the Jews? "Before Professor Dershowitz accused me of being an anti-Semite (news to me), I was a happy person. Since then, I'm still a happy person". –Michael Santomauro

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Be a homeroom hero! Help Yahoo! donate up to $350K to classrooms!


Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.


Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.

.

__,_._,___