Begin forwarded message:
From: Michele Lady Renouf <ladymrenouf@jailingopinions.com>
Date: March 31, 2011 7:24:46 PM CDT
Subject: Re: Brandenburger speech
TEXT OF LADY RENOUF SPEECH AT BRANDENBURG DEMO26th March 2011ComradesAs a British actress with a lifelong expertise in international television commercials - (for instance, you may be familiar with me on your tv screens in commercials for Tchibo Coffee) -in more recent years I have endeavoured in my Telling Films to show how politics applies similar persuasion techniques as in advertising which can mis-package and mis-lead public information.Perhaps you are familiar with the little TV film comedy shown every new year on German TV, "Dinner for One"? I propose it to you as the basis for a politico-legal parody in which "the lady" becomes a German Republic judge, and her "dinner guests" become the lawyers, Horst Mahler, Sylvia Stolz, Dr. Herbert Schaller, and the late great Juergen Rieger. In my parody, they each ask the judge if they may present before the court their client's evidence in support of scientific findings with regard to aspects of what is called "The Holocaust". And to each request by the lawyers to establish their Revisionist client's source critical findings, the judge refuses even threatens them with prosecution for merely asking, for ..."It is the same procedure as every year"!In reality, this refusal amounts to the separation of normal scientific attitude and justice in today's courtrooms, in Germany and in ten European countries including the unnecessary Zionist Entity of Israel - and I say unnecessary, because there was no political impediment in 1948 for European Jewry to go directly to their safe, ever-peaceful homeland of Birobidjan, the Jewish Republic on Russia's south-east border which has existed for the past 82 years in a pleasant region the size of Switzerland. Please view my all-round humane, common sense campaign website: www.jewishrepublic.comThis un-Constitutional separation in European courtrooms of scientific attitude and justice - which disallows the presentation of normal historical revisionism whilst privileging a veto on source criticism - denies our Western cultures their founding Classical Greek tradition of the four inseparable Virtues.Those 4 Classical Virtues are:1) Temperance (meaning Balance, Measure);2) Wisdom (in the Classical Greek sense with scientific attitude);
3) Justice (unbiased, non-privileged);4) Courage ( prompted by empathy, not vain-glory).I believe every European nation (and likewise Iran which shares our Classical scientific tradition) should stand up and defend these four inseparable Classical Virtues, the founding pillars of humane civilization!Normal historical revisionism without privileged vetoes or exceptions must be restored in our cultures and courtrooms. Therefore I call for the German authorities to repeal Article 130 and what is called "The Holocaust denial law" - a law which enforces debate-denial. The "Guidelines for Teaching about The Holocaust" are an outrage for stating, and I quote:"Care must be taken not to give a platform for deniers...or seek to disprove their position using normal historical debate and rational argument"! These "Teaching Guidelines" in themselves constitute a crime against our Classically-based civilization and must be rejected and, like Article130, be repealed.Revisionism is a method not an ideology for it does not "deny" but simply affirms whatever are the forensic findings. Therefore, free historical research!! Free attorneys who are imprisoned for defending the rights of their Revisionist clients!! Let Germany show the world a civilised example and free its scientists, scholars, and attorneys from its prisons!!In Telling Films I honour veterans like Mrs Ursula Haverbeck and her lady friends who demonstrated at last year's Frankfurt Book Fair for freedom first for Germans when China was the guest of honour at that world famous Book Fair. The public forum asked the question "What can the West do about China's human rights record?" My public reply was "We could set them a good example by freeing from German prisons lawyers like Horst Mahler, and scientists like Germar Rudolf, indeed free opinion for German citizens!!"In 2006, when the British historian David Irving was imprisoned in Vienna for ten civil words he uttered there sixteen years ago, the London Financial Times wrote:"Those Western countries that have laws against Holocaust-denial are in a difficult position. They must remove those laws."The British legal philosopher Ronald Dworkin stated that:"The European Convention on Human Rights should be used to strike down laws banning Holocaust denial."In 2008, two retired German Constitutional court judges, Wolfgang Hoffman-Riem and Winifried Hassemer, said "free speech should be extended in Germany to include Holocaust-denial" - that is, normal historical revisionism should be restored without exceptions.Therefore, let us all call loud and clear for the German authorities to free Horst Mahler and free Germany from the outrage of debate denying Article 130!!
Sent from my iPadDear Michele,
can you give me the email address of Richard? I need his speech, which he held in Brandenburg. Please also send me your speech, because I write the report and will incorporate the speeches.
Thanks for your help!
Kind regards
Kevin
--
"...when you have laws against questioning the Holocaust narrative, you are screaming at the other person to stop thinking!!!" ---Michael Santomauro, March 23, 2011
Being happy–is it good for the Jews? "Before Professor Dershowitz accused me of being an anti-Semite (news to me), I was a happy person. Since then, I'm still a happy person". –Michael Santomauro

