Enlightening to say the least... Salaries
Attachment(s) from Denver Media Service
1 of 1 Photo(s)
Attachment(s) from Denver Media Service
1 of 1 Photo(s)
Concern in Jewish World Over Murdoch Fallout
From: Manuel Sotil <msotil@gmail.com>
Date: August 13, 2011 7:11:49 PM EDT
To: ReporterNotebook <RePorterNoteBook@gmail.com>
Subject: Polish immigrant discovers harsh reality life in a multi-cultural society.
From the New York Daily News.<<She came to London seeking taste and refinement - only to find thugs and rioters.
A Polish immigrant forced to leap from her smoke-filled apartment during the British riots says her posh image of Londoners was shattered by the near-death experience.
"They set fire to my building without any thought for anyone's safety," said Konczyk, who arrived in London just five months ago.
"They were happy for me to die," she continued. "They were like animals - greedy, selfish animals who thought only of themselves."
>>
===================================================
Jewish Wealth, American Poverty
(Aug. 5, 2011)
Here's an interesting fact to chew on: The top 150 richest Jews in America have as much combined wealth as the poorest 180 million Americans.
Roughly, here's the calculation. In 2010, the Forbes Top 400 wealthiest Americans had a combined net worth (assets minus debts) of $1.37 trillion. As expected, many of them are Jews—in fact, 8 of the top 20, and 13 of the top 30. The ten richest Jews of 2010 are:
• Lawrence Ellison ($27 billion)
• Michael Bloomberg ($18 billion)
• Sergey Brin ($15 billion)
• Larry Page ($15 billion)
• Sheldon Adelson ($15 billion)
• George Soros ($14 billion)
• Michael Dell ($14 billion)
• Steve Ballmer ($13 billion)
• Don Bren ($12 billion)
• Carl Icahn ($11 billion)
Not far behind are the likes of Mark Zuckerberg ($7 billion), Rupert Murdoch ($6 billion), Si Newhouse ($6 billion), and David Geffen ($5 billion). Poor Steven Spielberg has to scrape by on $3 billion.
According to Jacob Berkman's analysis in 2009, at least 149 of the top 400 were Jewish ( http://blogs.jta.org/philanthropy/article/2009/10/05/1008323/at-least-139-of-the-forbes-400-are-jewish ). I'll round this number up to 150, assuming that at least one more Jew has cracked the top tier since then.
One hundred fifty people represent 37% of the top 400, and thus we can assume that they hold 37% of the $1.37 trillion — or, around $500 billion. That's one half of a trillion dollars, held by just 150 of the richest Jewish-Americans.
Now let's look at the bulk of Americans. According to NYU economist Edward Wolff, in a paper of March 2010, the bottom 40% of Americans had negative net worth—in other words, they owe more in debt than they have in assets. Even the middle fifth —t he true 'middle class' — is mostly underwater, and shows net wealth only at the upper limit.
Interpolating Wolff's numbers (I'll spare the reader the mathematical details), we can determine that we must sum the net wealth of the bottom 58% of Americans before attaining the figure of $500 billion — that amount owned by the top 150 Jews. So: 58% of our total population of 310 million works out to 180 million people.
One hundred and eighty million people, who struggle to survive day by day, can't pay for college, have no savings to speak of, can't retire with any semblance of security. One hundred and fifty Jews, on the other hand, with an obscene amount of wealth.
To be fair, we must point out that the top 150 Gentiles have even greater wealth, and this too is criminally unjust. But this group represents, collectively, over 98% of the American population. The wealthy Jews represent just 1.7%, and thus it is particularly astounding that such a small minority can come to occupy more than one-third of the places amongst the top 400 richest.
And finally we must ask some pointed questions: By what means was this massive Jewish wealth accumulated? To what end is it being deployed? Whose interests are fulfilled? What larger social cause is served? Is such wealth inequality not the result of a Jewish-inspired casino economy — one with 180 million 'losers'? Does much of this wealth not go to 'buy' politicians, who then pass laws that sustain and exacerbate this very inequality? Is not much of this wealth derived from war profiteering and near-suicidal empire building? Does not such a transfer of wealth from the many to the few qualify as deeply criminal, and thus worthy of the harshest retribution? What will it take, how much poverty and suffering can 180 million people endure, before they demand —before they take — action?
--Thomas Dalton, Ph.D
Author, Debating the Holocaust
(www.debatingtheholocaust.com)
Posted 08/12/2011 ET "You've damaged your own race," said Mayor Michael Nutter to the black youths of Philadelphia whose flash mobs have been beating and robbing shoppers in the fashionable district of downtown.
Advertise | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions |
From: JoRiz@aol.com
Date: August 13, 2011 1:43:01 AM EDT
To: ccfiile@gmail.com
Subject: The London rioters....YOUNG BLACKS
According to the Wall Street Journal, WHO were these "young people'?In a message dated 8/12/2011 6:23:47 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, RePorterNoteBook@Gmail.com writes:Britain Burns: Riots Spread Through UK Cities
The Associated Press
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/top/all/7689424.html
A wave of violence and looting raged across London and spread to three other major British cities, as authorities struggled to contain the country's worst unrest since race riots set the capital ablaze in the 1980s. In London, groups of young people rampaged for a third straight night, setting buildings, vehicles and garbage dumps alight, looting stores and pelting police officers with bottles and fireworks ... The riots appeared to have little unifying cause ... Many appeared attracted simply by the opportunity for violence. "Come join the fun!" shouted one youth in the east London suburb of Hackney, where shops were attacked and cars torched.