May 2, 2010

Re: [jacobandesau] Thomas Dalton responds to Roberto Muehlenkamp and Andrew Mathis


For the life of me, Mr. Santomauro, I cannot understand why you would so widely recommend "Holocaust Controversies" website. This is exactly what Muehlenkamp and his blogger team wanted to gain from going on Kevin Barrett's so-called "holocaust debate."
Muehlenkamp and team have already commented (lied) extensively in Barrett's "Truth Jihad Blog" comments section and exhausted their welcome there ... now they will continue to attack Dalton and every word he spoke on their own "Blog" site, with no refutation because no one with any sense would demean themselves by appearing there -- where you are directing people to go!!
Are you so hungry for attention?  Is this the way to do it? If Thomas Dalton wishes to make further rebuttals, he should do so in a place conducive to revisionism, in a dignified manner, where the likes of Muehlenkamp and Romanov would be held to proper rules and guidelines. You can then direct people there.

--- On Sun, 5/2/10, ReporterNotebook <> wrote:

From: ReporterNotebook <>
Subject: [jacobandesau] Thomas Dalton responds to Roberto Muehlenkamp and Andrew Mathis
To: "reportersnotebook" <>
Date: Sunday, May 2, 2010, 12:22 AM




Dalton's Holocaust Radio Debate on April 24, 2010:

http://www.american freedomradio. com/Barrett_ 10.html


Michael Santomauro
Editorial Director
Call anytime: 917-974-6367

http://www.Debating TheHolocaust. com

Amazon's: DEBATING THE HOLOCAUST: A New Look At Both Sides by Thomas Dalton

Recent Activity:

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.

Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.

Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.