Mar 22, 2010

Zionism’s Dark Forces Don’t Want the Lights On



Zionism's Dark Forces Don't Want the Lights On

By Alan Hart

March 22, 2010 "
Information Clearing House" - - At the opening of AIPAC's annual foreign policy conference its new president, Lee Rosenberg, was not a happy man. As he put it, "In recent days we have witnessed something (the Obama administration's initial public anger with Netanyahu and his government) very unfortunate."

The Biden "incident", Rosenberg said, was "regrettable", but Netanyahu had apologized "four separate times" and said "the announcement" (of more Jewish construction in occupied Arab East Jerusalem) was "hurtful and should not have been made." Quite so, Mr. Rosenberg. It would have been much better from Zionism's point of view if the announcement had not been made and Israel had just got on with the business of de-Arabizing East Jerusalem.

In any relationship even the best of friends were going to disagree, Rosenberg said, but it was "how friends disagree, how they react when missteps occur, that can determine the nature of the relationship."

Then he made his three key points:

"Number one, the people of Israel and the democratically elected government of Israel passionately believe in peace. And Israel is committed to its alliance with America.

"Number two, the United States and Israel both have a responsibility to work with one another and achieve that peace. That is what allies do.

"And three, allies should work out their differences privately."

That brought AIPAC's new president one of three standing ovations.

Why should disagreements between American administrations and Israeli governments be kept from the public?

Rosenberg's answer was: "History shows that when America pressures Israel publicly, it provides an opportunity for those who wish to derail the peace process to have their way."

Ah, so it's not Israel that is making peace impossible?

Rosenberg could not have been more explicit with AIPAC's take on that aspect of the matter.

"Ladies and gentlemen, let us be clear, the reluctant partner in this peace process is not Israel's elected leader Prime Minister Netanyahu. (Another standing ovation).

"The recalcitrant partner is the Palestinians and their leader – President Mahmoud Abbas.

"The Palestinians are bitterly divided between Hamas and Fatah – that is a problem. The failure of President Abbas to end his nay-saying and come to the table for direct talks which Prime Minister Netanyahu has been committed to from the start – that is a problem. The failure of the Arab world to begin normalizing its relationships with Israel – that is a problem.

"Israel is not the problem. Israel is America's partner. (The third standing ovation).

When I was a child my father often said to me, "Boy, there are none so blind as those who don't want to see."

But blind though AIPAC is for that reason, it's not completely out of touch with reality. It knows that the more Zionism's on-going colonisation is exposed to the light, the more the world understands that Israel is the obstacle to peace. (The world now includes some of the U.S.'s top military men who are going on the public record with their view that support for Israel right or wrong is not in the best interests of America).

If you are a Zionist, the case for keeping the lights off is a very strong one.

At the time of writing, I'm waiting, as no doubt many others are, to see if President Obama returns to his surrender mode when he meets with Netanyahu tomorrow.

Alan Hart has been engaged with events in the Middle East and their global consequences and terrifying implications – the possibility of a Clash of Civilisations, Judeo-Christian v Islamic, and, along the way, another great turning against the Jews – for nearly 40 years. More



Michael Santomauro
Editorial Director
Call anytime: 917-974-6367
Amazon's: DEBATING THE HOLOCAUST: A New Look At Both Sides by Thomas Dalton

Recent Activity:


Jeff Gates: "Anti-Semitism - What is it?"


Several of us among the incurably curious asked ourselves a simple question: what is anti-Semitism? That it must be written with a capital "S" says a lot.

Then we realized it also morphs. To that feature I can attest. In November 2002, I met a "John Doe" in London who proposed a research challenge. While meeting that challenge, I encountered various versions of anti-Semitism.

A colleague advised against this challenge. First he fretted at the criminal nature of what the research has since confirmed. Then he inquired about my safety. That said a lot. 

The colleague was M.I.T. Professor Noam Chomsky. For his criticism of Israeli policy, he was attacked as a self-hating Jew. Were he not Jewish, doubtless he would have been an anti-Semite. For critics of Israel, those are the only two options. He cautioned me:

You'll get the same thing: anti-Semitic, Holocaust denier, want to kill all the Jews, etc. It doesn't matter what the facts are. Bear in mind that you are dealing with intellectuals, that is, what we call 'commissars' and 'apparatchiks' in enemy states.

Dear Friends, Colleagues and Editors --

Attached is my contribution to a series on What is Anti-Semitism? This was written as a sequel to a What is Zionism? series that went viral online. This series is a prologue to a forthcoming series on Delegitimization beginning April 1st. Please urge your networks to focus their writings, interviews and such around that theme during the first week of April.

Is this anti-Semitism analysis relevant and topical? Note that Benjamin Netanyahu's brother just accused Barack Obama of anti-Semitism. Keep in mind that Clinton White House counsel Abner Mikva described Obama as "the first Jewish president."

I recently returned from ten days of briefings and interviews in Pakistan based on a 7-part series launched on Opinion-Maker, an influential Pakistani website. The first commentary generated 25,000 reads in the first 24 hours. Those of you unfamiliar with the back story to Guilt By Association may want to review two commentaries (here and here) as they identify the "John Doe" off whose multi-decade experience inside this trans-generational criminal syndicate the past seven years of research has pivoted.

Also urge that you review How Israel Wages War on the U.S. for a chronicle of the "how" of today's "field-based warfare." When waging mind warfare, the relevant battlefield is the shared field of consciousness where one of the most powerful weapons is the power of association. Note how the credibility of Colin Powell (a field-based property) was appropriated to displace facts with false beliefs about Iraqi WMD in plain sight and, to date, with impunity. 

While in Islamabad, I briefed cricket icon Imran Khan on the appropriation of his celebrity (another field-based property) so that, in practical effect, a sophisticated psy-ops campaign could breach the literacy barrier to inform and outrage tens of millions of Muslims with a classic agent provocateur operation that set off anti-U.S. demonstrations worldwide, including riots that killed 17 in Pakistan. Note the consistency with which the U.S. is made to appear the villain in these Israeli operations. Under ended, this relationship will continue to make us appear guilty by association.

This problem cannot be solved with hate any more than you can fight fire with fire. This war (and it is a war) must be fought with transparency, accountability and better design. The U.S. military may be recovering from its denial and reticence to press elected officials on the danger that Israel poses to U.S. interests. Perhaps we yet may see some semblance of representative government. See, for example, "How the Israel Lobby Took Control of U.S. Foreign Policy".

Informed Americans will look back on this period as a Dark Age when the facts required for informed consent were systematically displaced by Israelis and pro-Israeli operatives with the false, fixed and outright fabricated intelligence that enabled an enemy within to deploy our military to pursue what the Joint Chiefs cautioned Truman in 1948 was an agenda by "fanatics" determined to gain hegemony in the region. Make no mistake about it, what's being chronicled in these accounts is ongoing treason, a capital crime. With one honest U.S. Attorney willing to convene a grand jury, this systemic criminality could be exposed and the requisite criminal indictments issued to commence the accountability process.

Attached is a word doc version of the commentary. Note that it appears with graphics on Intifada-Palestine, Veterans Today and Opinion-Maker.

Editors: length is 1200 words plus byline. Please include a link to Criminal State. Please include links to two related articles: Are Hate Crimes Legalizing Treason? and Treason in Plain Sight.

Thanks for whatever you can do to educate a long-misinformed public both here and abroad. This was a big week for good news among those of you who are beginning to realize the common source of this trans-generational criminality and ongoing treason. We here at Criminal State have long advocated that our top military leaders are obliged to inform "our" president that Israeli behavior is endangering U.S. troops. That's a good start. Here's an account of that initiative by Veterans Today editor Gordon Duff with whom I traveled in Pakistan.

Please keep an eye on Criminal State for topical analyses as Israel and its supporters scramble to obscure and cover-up their ongoing criminality.

Best regards,

Jeff Gates

Tempe, AZ 85281



Michael Santomauro
Editorial Director
Call anytime: 917-974-6367
Amazon's: DEBATING THE HOLOCAUST: A New Look At Both Sides by Thomas Dalton

Recent Activity:


Documents of Auschwitz death camp doctors found

FILE - In this file photo of Wednesday April 22, 1998, young Israelis walk under the sign at Auschwitz concentration camp reading AP – FILE - In this file photo of Wednesday April 22, 1998, young Israelis walk under the sign at Auschwitz …
By MONIKA SCISLOWSKA, Associated Press Writer Monika Scislowska, Associated Press Writer 1 hr 57 mins ago

WARSAW, Poland – Food coupons for some of the notorious Nazi doctors at the Auschwitz death camp — including perhaps the sadistic Dr. Joseph Mengele — have been found in the attic of a nearby house, where they had lain unseen for decades.

Also found in the attic were other documents relating to the lives of Nazi officials, including death certificates and a map.

Some sugar coupons bear the names of Horst Fischer and Fritz Klein, doctors who were executed for their crimes after the war, Adam Cyra, a historian at the Auschwitz memorial museum who is looking through the documents, said Monday.

"The sensational value of this discovery is in the fact that these original documents, bearing the names of main murderers from Auschwitz, were found so many years after the war," Cyra said.

Cyra said he believes a June 1943 coupon for a small amount of sugar probably was assigned to Dr. Joseph Mengele, who was infamous for his sadistic experiments, but the writing is unclear.

A February 1944 coupon for 0.28 kilograms of butter is made out for a Dr. Mergerle. There was no SS doctor by that name at camp, so Cyra believes a clerk misspelled Mengele's name.

Doctors and pharmacists at the camp conducted pseudo-medical experiments on the inmates and helped select Jews arriving at the camp for either labor or death. Mengele escaped after World War II and evaded capture for the rest of his life.

The documents — almost 300 in total — were found in the attic of a house being renovated in the town of Oswiecim, where the Nazis built the Auschwitz-Birkenau camp.

The homeowner, who has requested anonymity, made them available to historians at the Auschwitz museum on Friday, museum officials said. They believe the house was used by an SS officer during the war, but it is not clear which one.

Historians have checked through some of the documents but have more to pore over, museum spokesman Pawel Sawicki said.

The material does not document crimes committed at the camp.

The documents include a German-language map of the area around Oswiecim and a death certificate for Adolf Kroemer, a pharmacist at Auschwitz, saying he died of a heart attack in February 1944.

About 150 blank food coupons and death certificates were also found, Cyra said.

Between 1940 and 1945 more than 1 million people, mostly Jews, were killed in the gas chambers at Auschwitz or died of starvation or disease while forced to perform hard labor at the camp.



Michael Santomauro
Editorial Director
Call anytime: 917-974-6367
Amazon's: DEBATING THE HOLOCAUST: A New Look At Both Sides by Thomas Dalton

Recent Activity:


Australia: in a debate with revisionists, the "denial" deniers would lose


To the Editor of The Australian        21st March 2010
from NIGEL JACKSON   15 Wattle Avenue, Belgrave, Vic 3160.    03-9754-7978
Oliver Kamm claims ("World Commentary", 19/3) that "Holocaust denial" (an ambiguous and prejudicial term) "can be argued consistently only by ignoring or faking the historical evidence", but the opposite appears to be the case. Rather, it is "Holocaust denial" denial (such as his) which refuses to participate in responsible debate - and for a very good reason. It will lose the argument and be seen to do so - to the jeopardy of various powerful political interests. Thus the "denial" deniers have organised matters so that their opponents (men of the high intellectual calibre such as Robert Faurisson, Carlo Mattogno and Jurgen Graf) are denied access to the public forums or even (like Germar Rudolf, Ernst Zundel, Pedro Varela, Sylvia Stolz and Horst Mahler) put in gaol after 'show trials' in which the judicial procedures are disgracefully corrupted. 'The Australian' can bring this matter to an end easily, by allowing a proper debate in its pages over the next few months, perhaps starting with this letter.
Nigel Jackson,
Belgrave, Vic

Robert Faurisson's Comment:
Date: Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:51 PM

My remark: I understand Nigel Jackson had to be very brief. I suggest that otherwise he could have added many other names such as the one of Arthur Robert Butz, our Number One revisionist author, and the names of many other of us who are in gaol such as Gerd Honsik and Wolfgang Fröhlich.

On March 22, his reaction to my remark was: "Thank you for reminding me about the eminence of Butz in revisionism. I will keep that in mind when I write in the future."

Of course N. Jackson's letter wasn't published, which, as he knows, is not a reason to stop sending such letters to that newspaper.



Michael Santomauro
Editorial Director
Call anytime: 917-974-6367

Amazon's: DEBATING THE HOLOCAUST: A New Look At Both Sides by Thomas Dalton

Recent Activity:


Selective Moral Panics in Higher Education


Christopher Kernich: Kent State student Murdered by Blacks 

Selective Moral Panics in Higher Education 

Edmund Connelly

March 22, 2010 

James Edwards and his crew from The Political Cesspool have done a great job of bringing to our attention the alarming disparity in how minor non-violent acts against Blacks in university-related settings are treated by the American press versus how murder of Whites by Blacks at the same setting is treated. For instance, he told the story of John White, who survived Iraq, but not Diversity:

John White was a young white man who had served in Iraq, and was working on a second master's degree at Kent State University, in small town Kent, Ohio. Unfortunately, Kent isn't far from Akron, or as many folks call it, Crackron, and Akron blacks like to drive over to Kent and beat white college students for fun. In January, John White's number came up. He was savagely beaten on January 23rd, and finally died from his injuries a few days ago. John White is the second white KSU student beaten to death by Akron blacks in the past few months. Two Crackron thugs beat Christopher Kernich to death back in November. 

John White and Christopher Kernich, RIP.

And if you want an eye-opening revelation, do a search on Google to see how KSU is responding to this crisis of black on white violence. In the last three months, four KSU students have been attacked by blacks, and two of them have died from their beatings. But you'd never have a clue that there's any problem by the lack of the university's response. Good luck finding anything. Compare that with the university in San Diego that went into full fledged crisis mode last week after a few white students held a ghetto-themed party, which was all over the national news. The administration issued several press releases denouncing the kids, held emergency meetings with black students, and caved in to one demand after another from the blacks on campus wailing about how they don't feel safe on campus. They even promised the blacks that private parties that they don't approve of will no longer be tolerated. But four white students attacked in three months by blacks, and two of them dying, and the university and media are completely silent.

Two things are happening here. First, the disproportionate attention given to alleged anti-Black racist behavior (many turn out to be hoaxes, as we'll see below) is a deliberate propaganda technique known as creating a "moral panic." Kevin MacDonald has already described this at our site: "Right now, the media ignores brutal Black on White crimes while fomenting moral panics when some college students at UC-San Diego failed to express officially sanctioned attitudes on Black History Month. (The LA Times has had 13 articleson this crisis, with no end in sight.) This demonization of Whites is the first step in large scale murderous revenge."

The chilling last sentence describes the second part of the process: plans for White Americans.

While Blacks are indiscriminately killing White college students across the country, the media bombards us with stories such as this:

2 Wisconsin Colleges Investigate Racist Flyers

Two Wisconsin colleges are trying to determine who distributed racist flyers on their campuses.

"White pride" flyers turned up at the University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh on Monday and last Thursday at St. Norbert College in De Pere.

St. Norbert says as many as 150 flyers were distributed on vehicles in two parking lots. The college captured video of the incident. The video and flyers were turned over to police. Jim Skorczewski, director of campus safety, says the suspect is not believed to be a student or school employee.

Both UW-Oshkosh and St. Norbert sent campus-wide e-mails Tuesday.

The UW-Oshkosh chancellor made a public appeal for anyone with information to contact university police.

Around the same time, California educators were obsessing over statewide allegations of White "racism."

Pledge to students: strategies to combat intolerance

SACRAMENTO — President Mark Yudof and UC Regents Chairman Russell Gould met face to face Monday (March 1) with students concerned about recent incidents of intolerance at University of California campuses and pledged to focus attention system wide on strategies to prevent such acts in the future.

"These are the worst incidents of racism I have seen on campuses in 20 years," Yudof told about 100 students who were staging a sit-in on the sidewalk in front of the UC Center Sacramento building on K Street. "I understand that students don't feel safe, they don't feel comfortable on their campuses." . . .

In a wide-ranging discussion, Yudof and the students also talked about UC Davis, where a swastika was carved on a Jewish student's door, and where anti-gay graffiti was sprayed in the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Resource Center.

"The university is in danger of losing the trust of its students" given the spate of incidents, said Jesse Cheng, student regent-designate.

Students asked UC leaders to endorse a request they delivered to 120 legislative offices Monday for legislation that would declare across California's three systems of public higher education "there is ZERO tolerance policy for acts of hate with intent to terrorize." The students' proposal would require students who commit such acts to be expelled and have their actions included in their permanent academic records.

There is now a university-sponsored site here which beseeches students to "Join the Battle Against Hate." A moral panic in full swing.

Meanwhile, we leave it to James Edwards to unravel the story:

Who hung the noose at UC-San Diego?

UC-San Diego has been in an uproar the past couple weeks because some white students held an off campus party whose theme was ridiculing ghetto behavior. Never mind that it was off campus. Never mind about free speech. Never mind that one of the organizers was "Jiggaboo Jones", who calls himself The #1 Nigger In America. Never mind that ghetto behavior is ridiculous, and should be ridiculed. None of that matters if colored people are offended, so university authorities denounced the private party, repeatedly, and are looking for excuses to punish the students involved. Blacks have been up in arms, holding protests, and making demands, and the school has been giving into almost all of them. They even promised blacks that parties they don't approve of will no longer be tolerated.

Then things got even more out of hand, after someone hung a noose in the campus library Thursday night. In response, hundreds of blacks stormed and occupied the office of university Chancellor Mary Anne Foxe, who's been doing nothing but groveling and pandering to them all week. This caused a new frenzy of media coverage, and almost every article mentioned that in California, hanging or displaying a noose "with intent to terrorize" is a hate crime punishable by a year in prison. Then, suddenly, the university announced that a female student had admitted to hanging the noose. She has been suspended, but apparently she hasn't been arrested. Both the university and the cops are refusing to release her name or any other details.

Which means one thing, of course. The female student who hung the noose isn't white. If a white person had confessed, the cops would've arrested him, and his bail would be ridiculously high, and his name and face would be all over the internet, newspapers, and cable TV. Everyone knows it's true, and yet the media will never, ever report this fact.

Another thing the media refuse to discuss is that these noose incidents (and many other "hate crimes") almost always turn out to be "self-inflicted", and the perpetrator rarely gets anything but a slap on the wrist, while a white person would've faced years in prison for doing the exact same thing in many jurisdictions. But when a black or other non-white confesses, they're portrayed as someone who meant well, but just went a bit too far in an attempt to "raise awareness" of racism. They're misguided and confused, good people at heart, who "made a mistake" and shouldn't be punished. They may pay a fine, do a little community service, and have to get counseling. While a white man who would do such a thing is seen as the very incarnation of evil, and would have to be locked up for years in prison.

There's two sets of laws in this country — one for white people, and one for non-whites.

Naturally, some uppity white folks have noticed the curious situation, and are wondering why the school and the cops won't release her name. Actually, they have a pretty good idea why, and they're saying so. (See the comments.) And what do liberals do when white people point out this utter hypocrisy, and are curious about who confessed to a crime that's been all over the news for the past few days, and why it's now being hushed up? What else? They denounce the white people, and accuse them of being on a witch hunt.

You can't win if you're white. If you commit a "hate crime", you face years in prison, while a black or other non-white faces, at worst, a slap on the wrist. Then if you point out this double standard, you're accused of "injecting race" into the discussion, and being on some kind of "witch hunt", etc.

(See also C-San Diego noose culprit is non-white.)

To make his point about the vast disparity between how minorities and Whites are treated in this sensitive area of "hate crimes," consider this:

Are Q-tips a hate crime?

Q-tips a hate crime? Sounds crazy, doesn't it? But in a few years, I'm sure some black or insane white liberal will be insisting that Q-tips are racist. Look at what's going on in Missouri, where police are "investigating" a bunch of cotton balls left on the ground:

University of Missouri police are investigating what appears to have been a racially motivated incident Friday morning at the campus' Gaines/Oldham Black Cultural Center.

Cotton balls were strewn across the center's lawn, walkway and bushes between 1:30 and 2:30 a.m. Police said two people were seen running from the center grounds.

Whoever is responsible could be charged with littering or tampering, said MU Police Capt. Brian Weimer. State statutes contain no hate crime law, but if racial motivation were found, "it would enhance the punishment for the crime," he said.

Well, such a crime cannot go unsolved let alone unpunished, and fortunately our men in blue were up to the task, as reported on VDARE: Two White Students Prosecuted In Missouri For Felony Littering: "Because authorities suspect the placement of the cotton balls on the center's lawn, walkway and bushes was racially motivated, the charges against the students were raised to Class D felony status."

Think about that: a FELONY. The horrifying part of this is that today's America seemingly finds this appropriate. The reason for such acceptance of official actions was explained in an insightful articleposted by George Hocking on TOQ online recently:

Racism now irrevocably taints all whites as much as original sin once tainted their ancestors. Just as those ancestors were once reminded of their sinfulness each Sunday morning, their descendents are reminded of their racism each day by a media cacophony. And its logic is impeccable. Since racial equality is as unquestioned as God once was and evidence of inequality is everywhere in non-white poverty, crime, low achievement, and general misbehavior, the only possible explanation is white racism.

That is why it really doesn't matter if such incidents are actual hate crimes perpetrated by Whites. Hoaxes committed by minorities, Jews and feminists are rampant and they succeed because the initial message spattered across the headlines is what counts. White males have been accused again—which is almost the same in the media as being convicted.

With such an explosive payoff for perpetrating hoaxes that seek to frame Whites for racism, it is no wonder that such instances are widespread. A classic account in this field is Laird Wilcox's spiral-bound study Crying Wolf: Hate Crimes Hoaxes in America. A detailed report of a more recent incident can be found in Until Proven Innocent: Political Correctness and the Shameful Injustices of the Duke Lacrosse Rape Case.

Let's close with some (dark) humor dealing with these cases. We turn again to James Edwards, who reports on how at least a few university leaders are immune to these moral panics (or are they?):

UC-Santa Cruz noose graffiti horror!

Another day, another phony "hate crime" on a college campus. Another noose, but this time it's only a picture of one, scribbled on the inside of a restroom door. For once, though, a college administration reacted rationally. Chancellor George Blumenthal responded to a reporter's inquiry about the incident:

"You have got to be kidding me! You're actually writing a story on restroom graffiti?! What the hell is wrong with you? And you wonder why newspapers are going out of business?! Whatever… Yes, I was informed of this noose scribbling earlier this morning, by one of the university vice presidents. After listening to his breathless tale, I asked him if he knew the difference between a university chancellor and a janitor. He said he did. So I told him to call the freakin' janitorial department and have it cleaned up, and that if he ever wasted any more of my time on nonsense like this he would be fired on the spot. And that's the end of the "story." Racism and hate on campus? You're a reporter, and you fall for this crap?! Almost every incident of this kind turns out to have been perpetrated by a member of the alleged "target" group. Everybody knows that. Except you, apparently. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have a lot more important things to do than waste my time on this kind of garbage. So if you want to write it up in your paper, go ahead. Then I suggest you get a freakin' life."

Nah, I'm just pullin' your leg, man! He didn't really say that.Instead, he went through the usual motions. Chancellor Blumenthal knows the drill:

Chancellor George Blumenthal posted this statement on the UCSC website on Monday. "This incident is deeply disturbing. I want to be clear: There is no place on this campus for racial intolerance or hate of any kind. To students and others who were subjected to this threatening message before it was removed, I want to apologize and offer my deepest assurance that I am committed to a zero-tolerance policy regarding racism at UCSC."

No place on campus for racial intolerance or hate? Zero tolerance policy for this kind of stuff? What a bunch of bull. What Blumenthal means is that there's zero tolerance for white people who draw nooses on doors, or hang real ones in libraries. But if a non-white does it, there's plenty of tolerance for that, as we just saw with UC-San Diego.

Somehow I feel I am not properly emphasizing the vast difference that exists between emphasis on White racial missteps on campus vs. that of non-Whites, particularly Blacks. Here, let me explain it this way.

Just prior to Christmas Break 2006, healthy Eastern Michigan University coed Laura Dickinson passed away unexpectedly in her dorm room. There was no foul play, the school said. Well, they lied. In fact, officials had reason to be suspicious of a black student, Orange Amir Taylor III, 20. Eventually he was arrested for raping and killing Miss Dickinson. 

Laura's father was devastated that the school had lied to them. "They let us bury her thinking that a healthy 22-year-old girl died by some freak accident."

Again, contrast such active lying about a Black-on-White RAPE/MURDER with discoveries of graffiti or cotton balls. There is no sane way to explain it. Academia may be further left than the nation as a whole, but the nation always manages to catch up.

That's why I discouraged one of my nephews from going into the humanities to earn a Ph.D. Based on my own experiences, I knew that the odds were stacked heavily against him at every turn—scholarships, grades, the right to enjoy a non-hostile environment in the classroom, etc.

Now that he has a fresh Ph.D. and is in the job market, race reality in academia is getting too real, beginning with the application process.

Though many schools only send an e-mail letter of rejection (or no response at all), he has immediately gotten mail to his house from EVERY academic job he has applied for. What is that correspondence? It's a form asking for demographic, i.e., racial, information. Again, based on my own experience in academia (fudging grades for affirmative action candidates, etc.) I have no doubt whatsoever that such forms are used to weed out White males and promote the privileged groups of multiculturalism.

Let's finish by returning to the topic of disparate emphasis put on (alleged) White hate crimes vs. all-too-real murders of White students. George Hocking's account explains why it is so crucial to constantly repeat these stories of condemnation of White racism: It is the prelude to our elimination. "Just as the only route to the eternal bliss of heaven in the old story [Christianity] was death, the only path to a blissful utopian future of racial equality in the new story is death of the white race."

The creation and propagation of this race-killing story can only be called wickedly brilliant. Unfortunately, it is working all too well as a critical mass of Whites has internalized it and therefore accepts these race crime reports uncritically. Worse, they demand punishment through race suicide.

Edmund Connelly (email himis a freelance writer, academic, and expert on the cinema arts. He has previously written for The Occidental Quarterly.

Permanent Link:



Michael Santomauro
Editorial Director
Call anytime: 917-974-6367

Amazon's: DEBATING THE HOLOCAUST: A New Look At Both Sides by Thomas Dalton

Recent Activity: