Aug 4, 2014

Senator David Norris" Israel bombs first and weeps later".


Israeli Peace Demo Violently Disrupted, Dozens Injured as Counter-Protesters Yell 'Death to Arabs' | Democracy Now!

Israeli Peace Demo Violently Disrupted, Dozens Injured as Counter-Protesters Yell 'Death to Arabs' | Democracy Now!



Israel is in reality a place that most Americans would find unsympathetic. It is a corrupt theocracy that denies equal rights to Christians and Muslims, a fact that is conveniently overlooked by Congress and the media. There is also a strong dose of racism and ethnocentrism in is political matrix, with broad popular support for either disenfranchising or expelling all non-Jews. Or even killing them, with crowds in Tel Aviv routinely chanting “Death to Arabs.”

Dr. Toben vs Fritz Berg of interest to Holocaust Revisionists:

From: Fredrick Toben 
Date: Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 9:13 PM
Subject: The Enemy within - lessons for the future generation; follow-up:
Cc: hoaxbuster ,,


1. Your claim of the high moral ground is interesting because according to the local police –  to whom you made a written report stating that Carto was stealing money – had sent 120 agents to raid the Cartos’ home …and found nothing with which to lay a charge against Carto! So, your lies did not bear fruit this time, nor in later years.

2. Did you initiate this raid as a trade-off because around this time you were involved in a New Jersey traffic incident where you bit a policeman? Dare I ask you now: Have you recently done any more biting?

3. It is so clear to me that the 1993 period was a time when the gassing story, especially through the 1985 and 1988 Zündel trials, had within the official Holocaust narrative reached crisis point. Note how David Cole in his book attempts to discredit Zündel, Leuchter, Faurisson, et al., who had broken the back of the Holocaust-Shoah-lies.

4. Hayward’s thesis was the Revisionists’ crowning glory – and had things worked out, then it would have been Jews who were responsible for breaking the Auschwitz gassing lie – Hayward and Cole. And the IHR needed to be destroyed, something that some prominent Revisionists could not foresee because they lacked the larger political picture – and who were also fearful of being labeled “Nazi”, et al.

4. That Revisionist victory was not to be because the 5-year embargoed thesis turned up as evidence in my 1998 case, which then would have made a non-Jew the messenger of the good news on matters Holocaust fraud.

5. So, Fritz, the fact that Revisionists legally destroyed Carto’s IHR is simply a fact that so pleased the Holocaust believers – and you were a part of this, which indicates to me that you will continue to bite people because that is in your very nature to do…

Best wishes.

Fredrick Toben

From: Fredrick Toben []
Sent: Friday, 1 August 2014 12:27 PM
To: 'hoaxbuster'
Cc: ''; ''; ''; ''; ''; ''; ''
Subject: RE: The Enemy within - lessons for the future generation -

Fritz –
1. Willis has always been a trusting person, and it must have been a mistake that you were made a director even for half a year – Weber’s appointment was then already part of the Untergang.
Did you ever build up an enterprise and deal with employees?

2. The Carto-IHR conflict is so typical of opportunistic behaviour among those who have nothing but just a dream of making quick money – David Cole is my current example of such behaviour. The IHR and The Spotlight were enterprises that also needed idealism to see the battle through to the end - and the AFP and TBR are still there – and that’s not a bad record.

3. By the way I like your sophistry as to the legal standing matter – generally as citizens we have moral, social and legal duties and you know very well that the purely legal focus causes injustices. In Australia we now have so-called overarching principles that imbue the legal fraternity with moral matters!

Best wishes.


From: hoaxbuster []
Sent: Friday, 1 August 2014 11:51 AM
To: Fredrick Toben
Subject: Re: The Enemy within - lessons for the future generation -

Dear Fredrick Toben,

Not only do you not know the "full details"--you know nothing about what really happened at the IHR.  John Bennett knew nothing either except for what Willis Carto told him.  He was not there--and neither were you.  I was there.  I was a director for the legitimate IHR for approximately a year until 1996. I had been a revisionist author over many years already as well as a major financial contributor and fundraiser of well over one hundred thousand dollars--much of that money had been my own. I resigned as a director as soon as  he Board of Directors foolishly appointed Mark Weber, against my vote and advice, as chairman of the board of directors for the IHR.

Willis Carto had no legal standing within the IHR throughout his entire period.  He was never a director or an employee or shareholder, ever.  But when a descendant of Thaoms Edison died, Carto pretended to be "an agent" for the IHR and tried to grab the multi-million dollar estate entirely for himself alone even though most of it had been clearly marked for the IHR.  Nothing went to the IHR--and that was the trigger, the RED flag, for the revolt which occurred among the entire IHR staff.  ALL of them joinmed in, including Tom Marcellus who had been the closest to Willis Carto.  Carto had even created an "international Legion for the Survival of Freedom" setup in the Caribbean to hide his stolen assets from the IHR. I knew about that because he had earlier tried to get me to send my biggest contribution ever to that obvious slush fund instead of to the IHR account.

You are obviously drunk on something just as you were when I participated by telephone in a revisionist conference you held many years ago.  Ease off on whatever it is you are taking..  Learn to walk before you try to run.

Friedrich Paul Berg
-----Original Message-----
From: Fredrick Toben
Sent: Jul 31, 2014 6:03 PM
To: 'hoaxbuster' ,
Cc: 'Josh Blakeney' , 'Eric' , 'Samson Royle'
Subject: The Enemy within - lessons for the future generation -
Briefly, Fritz

1. I don’t know what you mean by “booz and revisionism” - but just think who initiated the Carto-IHR matter. In Australia the IHR representative, John Bennett, much later and before he died, informed me what had happened – I did not know the full details until well into the middle-late 2000’s how a bunch of individuals, who never had anything, made a grab for the millions, thereby literally and legally stealing the IHR from its founder. The mindset behind this grab for the IHR is currently expressed in the “limited gassing” theory held by Cole, Irving, Weber, which is the safe cop-out position that has no legal consequences.  

2. The 1993 analysis of events coming together is my own reflection on what happened – I see this from the Hayward thesis matter and how it impacted on the case brought against me in Australia in 1998 and following.

3. The global legal connection is there legally –  the current Canadian and Australian legislation is being modified – the pattern is clearly visible. The US matter was decided by having a court take judicial of matters Holocaust – I think it was the Mermelstein case –  which has as yet not been done in Canada, Australia and UK.

4. I still say that had things worked out the way it should have the IHR would by now have been a fully functioning tertiary institution ... but life goes on ...and at least TBR and AFP is still there, and this is an achievement in itself. The fact that Carto was bankrupted through these legal proceedings indicates to me, as I stated clearly, it was the enemy within that did the job and pleased the enemy of Revisionism. Remember, I don’t blanket condemn any group, and hence my maxim remains valid: Don’t only blame the Jews, also blame those that bend to their pressure.

5. You didn’t end your sentence, so I don’t know what happened there – and I shall not assume too much...

6. Here endeth the lesson for the younger generation –

I wish you well Fritz in your endeavours.

Fredrick Toben

From: hoaxbuster []
Sent: Thursday, 31 July 2014 11:36 PM
To: Fredrick Toben;
Cc: 'Josh Blakeney'; 'Eric'; 'Samson Royle'
Subject: Re: Your interview with Fritz and Veronica - The Enemy within - lessons for the future generation -

Dear Readers.

Fredrick Toben's rant below merely shows that booz and revisionism do not mix well at all.  Toben's rant is NOT merely "unbalanced," it is as thoroughly stupid as anything I have seen in many years.  The last thing I saw to match this was Willis Cartro's own lying rants and even lawsuits against me while he was at the same time trying to get to me to join Carto's side in the legal battles with the IHR.  Willis Carto is a lying thief--it is really that simple.  ALL of his lawsuits against me and Weber and the legiitmate IHR failed totally in the courts--because they and Carto had NO merit whatsoever.  It was NOT the Jews; it was Carto's utter stupidity and obvious mendacity that undermined his foul attempts to regain what was never his legitimately to begin with.  Shame on Toben and all the others who refuse to recognize that.

Toben's rant about what supposedly "came together in 1993" is pure Carto fantasy.  Toben was never there; I was--I was an intimate part of it.  The IHR blew up when a multi-million dollar estate from one of Thomas Edison's descendants suddenly disappeared after the lady descendant died in Switzerland  The estate papers had designated the IHR as the beneficiary oif nearly the entire estate.  But nothing came to the IHR even though Carto had promised people at the IHR that ultimately it would--and that the st

Friedrich Paul Berg
Learn almost everything at
Nazi Gassings Never Happened!  Niemand wurde vergast!
-----Original Message-----
From: Fredrick Toben
Sent: Jul 30, 2014 10:43 PM
Cc: 'Josh Blakeney' , 'Eric' , 'Samson Royle'
Subject: Your interview with Fritz and Veronica - The Enemy within - lessons for the future generation -

The Realist Report - July 29, 2014:

Well done, John – except that Fritz got it wrong about Willis Carto who didn’t enrich himself as Fritz stated. That’s an unbalanced-envious, and ignorant viewpoint because Carto built a publishing enterprise, and if you have ever built up something, then you know how difficult it is to keep things going – and Fritz is still a lone walker; just like traitors Weber, Tom Metzger, and Paul Grubach – the latter two enjoyed getting the Carto’s bankrupted, which is typical of the enemy within who have never created anything. And what about Hoffman taking the subscription list, etc.
I recall much was made of Carto’s palatial home in California – nothing of the sort because I stayed there a few times – the move against Carto was done by those who had nothing and hoped to get something without working for it. No-one can dispute the Carto track record. It would be good if the AFP/TBR became the Carto Institute.

What came together in 1993 was the Jewish fear of the Holocaust lies breaking down – and so the powerhouse of Revisionism needed to be crushed, and they almost succeeded by breaking up The Spotlight/IHR enterprise and there are always willing helpers – that legendary enemy within.

1. 1993 Hayward’s MA thesis = no gassings – but embargoed for five years; I was able to submit it as my defence in court against the allegation that Revisionism was not academic, so in 1999 and 2000 we had Hayward recant, and Canterbury University, Christchurch, New Zealand, holding an enquiry into how the thesis was supervised – the two supervisors did not recant! When it came to my case the thesis/recanting had become a non-issue in my defence. Hayward had secretly written to the Commissioner, HREOC, to state that I had misused his thesis. Privately Hayward informed me – I visited him at his home and at work – that he had  received death threats to self/wife/children, etc.
2. Ernst Zündel’s appeal before Canadian Supreme Court threw out his two previous convictions-1985 and 1988;
3. Cole getting the statement from Piper in 1992 about no gassings at Auschwitz, Krema I;
4. The Rudolf Report confirming results of the 1988 Leuchter Report;
5. David Irving issues a video claiming he will single-handedly sink the Auschwitz;
6. Mark Weber initiating legal action against Carto’s enterprise.

That’s only my view of things...............



Michael Santomauro
Cell: 917-974-6367

Bias for Israel, How US Media Devalue Palestinian Lives



Israel is in reality a place that most Americans would find unsympathetic. It is a corrupt theocracy that denies equal rights to Christians and Muslims, a fact that is conveniently overlooked by Congress and the media. There is also a strong dose of racism and ethnocentrism in is political matrix, with broad popular support for either disenfranchising or expelling all non-Jews. Or even killing them, with crowds in Tel Aviv routinely chanting “Death to Arabs.”




Israel is in reality a place that most Americans would find unsympathetic. It is a corrupt theocracy that denies equal rights to Christians and Muslims, a fact that is conveniently overlooked by Congress and the media. There is also a strong dose of racism and ethnocentrism in is political matrix, with broad popular support for either disenfranchising or expelling all non-Jews. Or even killing them, with crowds in Tel Aviv routinely chanting “Death to Arabs.”


Instead of discussing the fact Palestinians are 110% on the RIGHT SIDE OF THE LAW while Israel remains 110% ON THE WRONG SIDE OF THE LAW, including the unlawful occupation of the Palestinian territories, Wolf Blitzer tried to play "gotcha" with a Palestinian official spokesman by playing a tape of Mr. Hassan Hamdan talking about the Jewish blood libel; Hamden explained to Blitzer the Jewish blood libel is part of recorded history. Hamden should have asked Blitzer about all those New York Rabbis being charged by New York City District Attorneys for sucking baby penises WHILE giving them AIDS and HERPES during Jewish circumcision rituals. (Google, jewish rabbis babies aids herpes new york times)
Blood libel (also blood accusation) is an accusation that Jews kidnapped and murdered the children of Christians to use their blood as part of their religious rituals during Jewish holidays. Historically, these claims—alongside those of well poisoning and host desecration—have been a major theme in European persecution of Jews.
Blood libels typically say that Jews require human blood for the baking of matzos for Passover, although this element was allegedly absent in the earliest cases that claimed (the contemporary) Jews reenacted the crucifixion. The accusations often assert that the blood of children of Christians is especially coveted, and, historically, blood libel claims have been made to account for otherwise unexplained deaths of children. In some cases, the victim of human sacrifice has become venerated as a martyr, a holy figure around whom a martyr cult might arise. Three of these -- William of Norwich, Little Saint Hugh of Lincoln, Simon of Trent—became objects of local cults and veneration, and in some cases were added to the General Roman Calendar, even though lacking official canonization in the Roman Catholic Church. One, Gavriil Belostoksky, was canonized by the Russian Orthodox Church.
In Jewish lore, blood libels were the impetus for the creation of the Golem of Prague by Rabbi Judah Loew ben Bezalel in the 16th century. According to Walter Laqueur:
Altogether, there have been about 150 recorded cases of blood libel (not to mention thousands of rumors) that resulted in the arrest and killing of Jews throughout history, most of them in the Middle Ages. In almost every case, Jews were murdered, sometimes by a mob, sometimes following torture and a trial.

We could not mention Israel in any context.

5 Reasons Why Israel is an Apartheid State | Weapons of Mass Distraction

Raimondo: Israel, Genocide, and the ‘Logic’ of Zionism

Raimondo: Israel, Genocide, and the ‘Logic’ of Zionism

Has Palestine Lost Egypt As An Ally?

Why Does Israel Keep Changing Its Story On Gaza?

From: sandy schpoont <>
Date: Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:05 AM

Dear Michael:
Your actions today were inexcusable. You had no right to call EMS and cause Mikey so much pain. Up until now I have advocated for your unsupervised visits with Mikey. I cannot continue to do so with a clean conscience. I will inform the court about your behavior today and recommend that all future contact with your son be supervised. Please be available for a phone call with the court today.

Very Truly Yours,
Sandra L. Schpoont, Esq.



You made a determination at or before 10:05 AM, when Mikey was still in the nurse station and EMS never got to the scene, this is mind boggling-!!!! 

Please listen to what you claim are NOT my rights as a father when my child does NOT feel well, see attachment.

Since the inception of this divorce and especially starting on Nov. 17, Justice Cooper has got a  "hammer and nails"  for me.

You know what "rules are for fools" means because I kept and keep telling you:

"People who can't think on their own unless it is laid out for them." 

It is rare, I have to ask Mikey to floss his teeth or take a shower before bedtime and when I do have to ask on those rare occasions I remind him "rules are for fools." My son has a Mensa IQ and as you know he is very sophisticated and full of joy. (Or was before July 23).

Susan Budney's short comings are that she is on a heavy dosage of Klonopin due to her anxiety disorder, which is a mental illness, and her resistance to co-parent with me especially on July 23, 2013.

Not all, but many people who suffer from anxiety disorder have as the major component for their mental illness to be jealous. I was Mr. Mom for the first ten years of Mikey's upbringing and Mikey prefers to be with me half the time which I am willing to accommodate by renting out my Lake Norman home. Then live in Manhattan until he wants to be more independent and away from his parents, which will probably happen in the next 2-3 years, 

In my opinion, the next two years are the most important years in a boy's life to have a father or a father figure.

I have no choice but to sue you for gross incompetence for the all the legal fees I have incurred from and on the day of July 23, 2013, by rushing your work and not doing due diligence. You rushed to judgement two days before your trip to Italy for your vacation. How can you make such an erroneous and speculative recommendation to the court two days before leaving the country and then stop your work for the truth. 

When I kept trying to explain what happened to Justice Cooper on the phone conference you kept crushing my freedom to express myself.  What sort of TRUTH crushes the freedom to seek the truth?

Your work was extremely sloppy on July 23, 2013 and your email to me on that day was and continues to be bizarre. 

Michael Santomauro 

PS: The camp report contradicts the report that you orally reported to Justice Cooper. The camp report makes clear I never caused a commotion, there was never any conflict, according to the camp report. Bernie, the CEO, of the camp will testify that you are putting words in his mouth. Which, I agree is true, since I was on the conference call with both of you, so I don't know why you are making untrue claims, that I caused a commotion.

The camp report phone records show that Susan informed the camp that Mikey was not feeling well 40 minutes before the drop off at the bus stop, 

Dr. Bernie Tessler, who is the CEO of the camp told me that I did everything I was suppose to do as a father, to make sure that Mikey was okay. He even apologized while you were on the phone that the camp director was wrong. And I later learned I was lied too because Susan was putting pressure on them not to release Mikey to me. There was never any call on my part to the EMS, it is just state law that they have to send one. I never requested one, if anything I was trying to talk them out of sending one

PS #2: The police had to mute Luke's voice in the background but once I get that lifted from another court order, the whole truth will be very CLEAR. That I was instructed to call the police for a court document to be shown to me by Luke, which he never had to show.

PS #3: The transcripts in June shows Justice Cooper siding with me. The only turning point (or hinge) to the turn of events is your mis-understanding and lack of due diligence on July 23, 2013:

You made the following claims on the phone conference with Justice Cooper that were inaccurate and untrue.

---That I called the camp 30-40 times. NOT TRUE. The camp never said it and the phone records show I called 5 times, just to get a live person, because each machine I got told me to call another number.

---That I caused a commotion from at the camp no different than what happened at Mikey's school, your words: "with the father's Holocaust book".  ABSOLUTELY NO COMMOTION ON MY PART AT ALL-!!!! If anything I was confused what was going on, especially when the camp director had no court document to produce when he claimed he would show it when the police would arrive. The muted part of the police call will be un-muted with the subpoena signed by Justice Cooper (or Judy White) of this event.

--- That I intentionally called EMS. The camp director told me to call the police because he said he had a court document and could only show it to me if I called the police. He lied. And I was stuck at the camp because Susan kept calling the camp director that I could only be with my son at 5pm that day even if my son does not feel well. This is REALLY crazy stuff that I am going through-!!!!!

---That the therapist says I told Mikey "not to follow rules."  When I told him no such thing. You know what "rules are for fools" means because I kept telling you: "People who can't think on their own unless it is laid out for them." 

---That Mikey almost got kicked out of the camp. This is a SICK lie on you part-!!! I am speechless.You heard the CEO of the camp apologising to me and I accepted his apology! Because he was embarrassed what happened at the camp with Luke's unprofessional behavior that could have gotten him arrested.

You failed to mention to Justice Cooper on the July 23rd phone call that Susan won't co-parent. Susan BLOCKS my phone calls and TEXTS. And only checks her email box twice a day-!!! When she was on the phone with the camp director, I asked the camp director to give me his phone to talk to Susan, she would tell the camp director that she would not talk to me. I tried using my son's phone and when she heard my voice she would hang-up on me.

I ask that you reverse your assessment of what happened on July 23, 2013 or PROVE the above allegations that you continue to stand by to be true, including your assessment of me being mentally ill according to the court transcripts on August 14, 2013 in front of Justice Cooper.

Also stop billing me, because I am suing you for malpractice.


From: Debra M <off84@>
Date: Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 11:23 AM

Happy new year my friend, I pray and think about you and Mikey a lot.. I couldn't read most of this because it has gotten so far out of hand and I know you don't have anything against the Jewish people, why would you have them as friends if you "hated" them so much. I pray that there be a quick resolve here Michael as this on going issue is very disturbing. You always have my support my good friend, keep strong, keep faithful, keep your eye on the prize ( Mikey)....

Letter from The Mandel Law Firm (Steven J. Mandel) 12-9-13
Michael Santomauro 

When a Judge loses his objectivity, then the truism applies:
Everything is religious, everything is political.
Truth is no defence and legal railroading and a witchtrial mentality manifests itself – legal persecution, with which especially Holocaust Revisionists are familiar. This is illustrated in the following court transcript selection, so please, read on... 

Page 14 into page 15: 

Justice Matthew F. Cooper:  "The Fucking Jews"
Mr. Santomauro: No, actually, it was the opposite of that. It was "Fuck the Arabs" in the essay.
Justice Matthew F. Cooper: Oh, that's better.

Justice Matthew F. Cooper: "Is that [Jewish] agenda to dilute the Aryan race?" On page 20: 

"An anti-Semite condemns people for being Jews, I am not an anti-Semite."--Michael Santomauro. 


The essay in question:

+The Myth of the Innocent Civilian

"Justice Matthew F. Cooper has distorted, invented or misremembered almost every significant claim and phrase. In particular, 'Jewish conspiracy' is completely false, in spirit and in word.

"It is serious and upsetting. Rather than correct a smear, Justice Cooper has attempted, perhaps not surprisingly, to justify one smear with another in the same direction.

"Michael Santomauro promotes the ideal of "scientific journalism" – where the underlaying evidence of all articles is available to the reader precisely in order to avoid these type of distortions. Michael Santomauro treasurse his strong Jewish support  just as he treasures the support from pan-Arab democracy activists and others who share the hope for a just world." --I.S.

+The Five Dancing Israelis Arrested On 9-11: