Sep 20, 2011

Bradley Smith: Letter to the Editor of The Trojan


Begin forwarded message:

From: Bradley Smith / Codoh <>
Date: September 20, 2011 10:05:08 PM EDT
Subject: Letter to the Editor of The Trojan

Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust

The Daily Trojan

University of Southern California





17 September 2011


To the Editor


The Daily Trojan does indeed provide protection. Its General Ad Policies recite the goal of "safeguarding USC's Principles of Community," in the copy kindly provided to the Committee for Open Debate of the Holocaust (CODOH) in rejecting the paid advertisement we sought to place in its pages.


In providing this protection, it also provided (unsought) protection to the student body from Open Debate of a body of history much called upon by the only nuclear power in the Middle East to claim over $3 billion per year of American taxpayers' money, plus the additional billions paid to repressive client regimes in neighboring countries to bribe them to protect this invader in an area previously populated by Muslim Arabs.


And thus, it protects the USC community from the MTD (Mentally-Transmitted Disease) of an accurate understanding of the history upon which Israel excuses not only the bloody process by which it established itself in Palestine, but of the still-bloodier process by which it expands and tightens its hold on peoples (Jews and Arabs alike) under the guns of its American-supplied military supremacy.


Principles of Community? USC is home to students from Israel. It is home to students from Palestine and other Arab countries whose citizens appear to sympathize with the plight of Palestinians displaced (or slaughtered) by the Zionist project in Israel. USC is home to thousands of American students, many Jewish, most not, thoroughly schooled in the sanctity of this very "controversial" novelty on the soil of Palestine. Their schooling likewise, pursuant to the law in many of their states, instructed them prejudicially on Germans before and during World War II and Germany's National Socialist regime that America and its allies "changed" through devastating force of arms. And it is home to Steven Spielberg's monument to retributive hatred, the Shoah Foundation.


What Principle of Community, then, might it be that the Trojan is protecting by rejecting a text link that reads, "The Holocaust. The Power of Taboo" The link, of course, goes to the Web site of CODOH. Below you will find the link to the ADL/Hillel Manual For Action detailing how to prevent or punish college student newspapers for carrying ads from  --   CODOH


I trust USC would-if it were aware of it-be grateful for the protection its Daily Trojan affords it. The young need protection. So they'll march off to war when we tell them to.

On Principles of Community, of course.


Jett Rucker (American veteran, age 68)

             for CODOH





Fighting Holocaust Denial inCampus Newspaper Advertisements





The ADL/Hillel Manual for Action:A Crime against Thought


Recent Activity:

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.



"progressive" in the sense that cancer is healthy


Begin forwarded message:

From: frank scott <>
Date: September 20, 2011 6:24:26 PM EDT
Subject: "progressive" in the sense that cancer is  healthy

The New York Times

  • crackpot realists of the democratic party for this turkey or you'll get something even worse...

    it's called "corporate democracy"...

    hey, what's he supposed to do? stop spending trillions on bombing and maiming all over the middle east?

    c'mon, be realistic...

    join the crackpots...

    September 19, 2011

    Obama Proposes $320 Billion in Medicare and Medicaid Cuts Over 10 Years

    WASHINGTON — President Obama's budget director said Monday that the president's new deficit-reduction plan would impose "a lot of pain," and that is clearly true of White House proposals to cut $320 billion from projected spending on Medicare and Medicaid in the coming decade.

    Mr. Obama proposed higher premiums and deductibles for many Medicare beneficiaries and lower Medicare payments to teaching hospitals and rural hospitals. He would start charging co-payments to frail homebound older people who receive home health services. And he would reduce the growth of federal payments to states for treating low-income people under Medicaid.

    The White House said Mr. Obama's proposals would cut $248 billion from the projected growth of Medicare in the next 10 years, while shaving $72 billion from Medicaid and other health programs. A large share of the Medicare savings would, in effect, be used to pay doctors, who would otherwise face deep cuts in the fees they receive for treating Medicare patients.

    The proposals are part of a package to reduce deficits by more than $3 trillion over 10 years, beyond the $1 trillion in savings already assumed under the debt limit law that Mr. Obama signed in early August. The package includes tax changes intended to raise $1.5 trillion in revenue over 10 years.

    Mr. Obama would also allow the Postal Service to cut its losses by ending Saturday mail delivery. He would reduce farm subsidies by $31 billion over 10 years, require federal employees to contribute more to their pension plans, force military retirees to pay more for prescription drugs and charge higher fees to air travelers for "aviation security."

    Jacob J. Lew, director of the White House Office of Management and Budget, rejected suggestions that the White House was going after rich people.

    "If you look at the details of what's in the plan that the president is sending to the Congress," Mr. Lew said, "there is a lot of pain, and it's spread — it's spread broadly and we think fairly."

    Medicare and Medicaid insure more than 100 million people and account for nearly one-fourth of all federal spending. The proposed savings, which provoked predictable protests from health care providers, represent less than 3 percent of what the government expects to spend on the programs in the next 10 years.

    Speaking in the Rose Garden on Monday, Mr. Obama said his plan — in the form of recommendations to a bipartisan Congressional committee on deficit reduction — "includes structural reforms to reduce the cost of health care in programs like Medicare and Medicaid."

    The proposal would require new beneficiaries to pay higher deductibles before Medicare coverage of doctors' services and other outpatient care kicks in. The deductible, now $162 a year, is already adjusted for inflation. Mr. Obama would increase it further by $25 in 2017, 2019 and 2021.

    In addition, the White House would increase Medicare premiums by about 30 percent for new beneficiaries who buy generous private insurance to help fill gaps in Medicare.

    Many beneficiaries choose these private Medigap policies because they want the financial security they get from the extra insurance. But the White House said this protection "gives individuals less incentive to consider the costs of health care and thus raises Medicare costs."

    Mr. Obama would raise $20 billion over 10 years by charging higher premiums to higher-income beneficiaries and by freezing the income thresholds so more people would have to pay the surcharges.

    About 5 percent of the 48 million Medicare beneficiaries now pay the higher premiums. The proportion would eventually rise to 25 percent under the proposal.

    Starting in 2017, Mr. Obama would require certain new beneficiaries to pay co-payments for home health care, which is now exempt from such charges. The co-payment would be $100 per episode, defined as a series of five or more home health visits not preceded by a stay in a hospital or a skilled nursing home.

    Howard J. Bedlin, vice president of the National Council on Aging, a service and advocacy group, said such co-payments would "significantly increase out-of-pocket costs for many low-income widows with multiple chronic conditions." Likewise, Mr. Bedlin said, "The Medigap proposal would shift costs onto Medicare beneficiaries."

    Mr. Obama also proposed these changes:

    ¶ Require drug companies to provide additional discounts, or rebates, to Medicare for prescription drugs bought by low-income beneficiaries. This proposal, opposed by drug makers, would save the government $135 billion over 10 years.

    ¶ Squeeze $42 billion over 10 years from Medicare payments to nursing homes, home health agencies and rehabilitation hospitals. Cut Medicare payments to nursing homes with large numbers of patients hospitalized because they did not receive appropriate care in the nursing home.

    ¶ Require doctors to get approval from Medicare for the most expensive imaging services.

    ¶ Revise the formula for calculating Medicaid payments to states, saving $15 billion over 10 years. Restrict states' ability to finance their share of costs by imposing taxes on care providers.

    ¶ Cut $3.5 billion over 10 years from a prevention and public health fund created by the new health care law.

    Another White House proposal would save $20 billion over 10 years by reducing Medicare payments to hospitals and other providers for bad debts that result when beneficiaries fail to pay deductibles and co-payments.


    Frank Scott writes  political commentary and satire which appears in print in The Independent Monitor and online at the blog Legalienate

    Recent Activity:

    Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.



    Director retracts apology for Hitler sympathy at Cannes


    Director retracts apology for Hitler sympathy at Cannes
    September 20, 2011

    (JTA) -- Director Lars von Trier has retracted his apology for saying at the Cannes Film Festival that he had sympathy for Hitler.

    In an interview in this month's GQ magazine, von Trier said his apologies at and immediately after Cannes, where he was declared a persona non grata and removed from the festival in May, were not sincere and forced, the Toronto Sun reported.

    "I'm not sorry. I am not sorry for what I said," he reportedly told GQ. "I'm sorry that it didn't come out more clearly. I'm not sorry that I made a joke. But I'm sorry that I didn't make it clear that it was a joke."

    Von Trier had said during a news conference at Cannes that "I really wanted to be a Jew, and then I found out that I was really a Nazi because, you know, my family was German, which also gave me some pleasure.

    "What can I say? I understand Hitler, but I think he did some wrong things, yes, absolutely. But I can see him sitting in his bunker in the end. He's not what you would call a good guy, but I understand much about him and I sympathize with him a little bit. But come on, I'm not for the Second World War, and I'm not against Jews. I am very much for Jews. No, not too much, because Israel is a pain in the ass."


    Fun stuff to read, tell and watch:

    Now FREE to watch all 91 minutes: "Defamation," from Israeli filmmaker Yoav Shamir. LINK:

    Some of His Best Friends Are Jewish: The Saga of a Holocaust Revisionist By Nathaniel Popper. Link: Israeli lawyer has filed a class-action lawsuit against former President Jimmy Carter, seeking $5 million in damages because his book "Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid" allegedly defamed Israel. Link:

    "...when you have laws against questioning the Holocaust narrative, you are screaming at the other person to stop thinking!!!" ---Mike Santomauro. *Anthony Lawson's Holocaust Video "were the Germans so stupid"... Link:

    An anti-Semite condemns people for being Jews, I am not an anti-Semite.--Mike Santomauro. Link:

    Start reading DEBATING THE HOLOCAUST in under a minute:


    Mike Santomauro
    Editorial Director
    Call anytime: 917-974-6367

    Recent Activity:

    Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.



    Jewish US army translator who got close to the Nazis By Mario Cacciottolo



    19 September 2011 Last updated at 12:37 ET
    Jewish US army translator who got close to the Nazis
    By Mario Cacciottolo
    BBC News
    A German Jew who became a US military translator is the last surviving member of a team that carried out psychological tests on leading Nazis after the war. They learned very little, he says - but he gained unique insights into their characters.
    "If you took away the names of these Nazis, and just sat down to talk to them, they were like your friends and neighbours."
    Howard Triest, 88, spent many hours with some of the most notorious leaders of the Third Reich, acting as a translator for American psychiatrists at Nuremberg.
    It was September 1945, shortly after the end of World War II in Europe, and the highest-ranking Nazis still left alive were about to be tried for war crimes.
    "I'd seen these people in the time of their glory, when the Nazis were the rulers of the world," he says. "These rulers had killed most of my family, but now I was in control."
    Among them were Luftwaffe chief Hermann Goering, Hitler's former deputy Rudolf Hess, Nazi propagandist Julius Streicher and former Auschwitz commandant Rudolf Hoess, among others.
    "It's a very strange feeling, sitting in a cell with a man who you know killed your parents," he says, referring to Hoess.
    "We treated them in a civil way, I kept my hate under control when I was working there. You couldn't betray how you really felt because you wouldn't get anything out of their questioning.
    "But I never shook hands with any of them."
    Escaping the Nazis
    Howard was born into a Jewish family in Munich in 1923, and was already a teenager when Nazi persecution intensified.
    His family left for Luxemburg on 31 August 1939, the day before Germany invaded Poland, intending to travel onward to the United States in due course. But a shortage of money prevented them making the journey together. So Howard went first, in April 1940, with his parents and younger sister due to follow a month later.
    For his parents, the delay proved fatal. His mother Ly, 43, and Berthold, 56, were later sent from France to Auschwitz, where they both died.
    His sister Margot was smuggled out to Switzerland and from there also left for the US, where she still lives, like her brother.
    Howard's attempts to enlist into the US army were initially rebuffed because he was not a citizen but eventually, in 1943, he succeeded. He was made a US citizen a few months later.
    After being posted to Europe and landing at Omaha Beach a day or two after D-Day, he found himself working for military intelligence, thanks to his ability to speak fluent German, a valuable skill as the Allies pushed across the continent towards Berlin.
    In summer 1945 he was discharged, but immediately began work for the American War Department as a civilian - and was sent to Nuremberg to assist Major Leon Goldensohn with his psychiatric evaluations of the defendants awaiting trial.
    That is how a Jewish man, who had fled the rule of the Nazis, came to spend hours in their company, sitting with them in their cells, translating the psychiatrist's questions, and their responses.
    Maj Goldensohn was conducting diagnoses such as the Rorschach tests, in an attempt to unravel the prisoners' personalities and motivations.
    Howard is now the last surviving member of the psychiatric team, and his account of his experiences in a new book, Inside Nuremberg Prison, by historian Helen Fry, provides some vivid character sketches.
    'Zombie' Hess
    "Goering was still a very pompous man," he recalls.
    "He was the eternal actor, the man that was in charge. He considered himself the number one prisoner, because Hitler and Himmler were dead. He always wanted the number one seat in the courtroom.
    "He arrived at Nuremberg with eight suitcases, mostly packed with drugs, because he had a big habit, and was surprised that he was treated as a prisoner and not as a famous personality."
    Howard also came into contact with Rudolf Hess, once Hitler's deputy until his flight to Scotland in May 1941, where he was captured.
    He recalls Hess as being "like a zombie".
    He added: "Hess thought he was being persecuted, even when he was being held in England. He made sample packages of food and gave some to me and the psychiatrists and asked for them to be analysed, as he thought he was being poisoned.
    "He was a quiet prisoner, who answered a few questions but didn't go into details. Nobody knew how much was play acting and what was real, how much he could actually remember."
    Hidden hate
    In the course of his duties, Howard also came face to face with Rudolf Hoess, a meeting all the more intense because of the death of Howard's parents at Auschwitz, once under Hoess's control.
    "Both Maj Goldensohn and I were with him many times. Sometimes I was with him alone in his cell," Howard says.
    "People used to say to me: 'You can take revenge, you can take a knife into his cell.'
    "But the revenge was that I knew he was in prison and that I knew he would be hanged. So I knew he was going to die anyway. Killing him myself wouldn't have done me any good."
    He describes Hoess as "very normal. He didn't look like someone who had killed two or three million people."
    One remarkable incident occurred with Julius Streicher, whose Der Stuermer newspaper had done much to whip up anti-Semitic hysteria among Germans.
    "He was the biggest anti-Semite of all. I interviewed him with another psychiatrist, Maj Douglas Kelley.
    "Streicher had some papers that he didn't want to give to Maj Kelley, or anyone else, because he said he didn't want them to fall into Jewish hands.
    "Eventually he gave them to me - I was tall, blond and blue-eyed. He said 'I'll give them to your interpreter because I know he is a true Aryan. I can tell by the way he talks.'
    "Streicher talked to me for hours because of his idea I was a 'true Aryan'. I got a lot more out of him that way."
    In fact, none of the Nazis who Howard translated for were ever aware he was Jewish.
    Lessons learned?
    He says that, despite the psychiatrists' best attempts, no great insight was gained into psychological source of the Nazi mentality.
    "Did we learn anything from these psychiatric tests? No. We didn't find anything abnormal, nothing to indicate something that would make them the murderers they would become.
    "In fact, they were all quite normal. Evil and extreme cruelty can go with normality.
    "None of them ever showed remorse. They said they knew there were camps but they didn't know about the annihilation of people.
    "It was a pity they didn't go through the same things that their victims went through, that Hoess didn't suffer in a camp the same way his prisoners did."
    Howard says he hopes the story of the Holocaust is never forgotten.
    "But look at the world today. Is it much quieter? Some of the victims have changed, but there are still victims around the world," he says.

    Before we finish our interview, Howard is keen to tell a further anecdote about Nuremberg's would-be number one inmate.

    "Goering once said that if any bombs were dropped on Berlin, he would eat a herring. Well, I was in charge of censoring his post, and someone did actually send him a herring.
    Howard chuckles gently. "I threw it away. It smelled a little bit."


    Fun stuff to read, tell and watch:

    Now FREE to watch all 91 minutes: "Defamation," from Israeli filmmaker Yoav Shamir. LINK:

    Some of His Best Friends Are Jewish: The Saga of a Holocaust Revisionist By Nathaniel Popper. Link: Israeli lawyer has filed a class-action lawsuit against former President Jimmy Carter, seeking $5 million in damages because his book "Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid" allegedly defamed Israel. Link:

    "...when you have laws against questioning the Holocaust narrative, you are screaming at the other person to stop thinking!!!" ---Mike Santomauro. *Anthony Lawson's Holocaust Video "were the Germans so stupid"... Link:

    An anti-Semite condemns people for being Jews, I am not an anti-Semite.--Mike Santomauro. Link:

    Start reading DEBATING THE HOLOCAUST in under a minute:


    Mike Santomauro
    Editorial Director
    Call anytime: 917-974-6367

    Recent Activity:

    Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.



    Skeptic's Take on the Origins of Success: Scientific American



    Fun stuff to read, tell and watch:

    Now FREE to watch all 91 minutes: "Defamation," from Israeli filmmaker Yoav Shamir. LINK:

    Some of His Best Friends Are Jewish: The Saga of a Holocaust Revisionist By Nathaniel Popper. Link: Israeli lawyer has filed a class-action lawsuit against former President Jimmy Carter, seeking $5 million in damages because his book "Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid" allegedly defamed Israel. Link:

    "...when you have laws against questioning the Holocaust narrative, you are screaming at the other person to stop thinking!!!" ---Mike Santomauro. *Anthony Lawson's Holocaust Video "were the Germans so stupid"... Link:

    An anti-Semite condemns people for being Jews, I am not an anti-Semite.--Mike Santomauro. Link:

    Start reading DEBATING THE HOLOCAUST in under a minute:


    Mike Santomauro
    Editorial Director
    Call anytime: 917-974-6367

    Recent Activity:

    Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.



    DEANNA SPINGOLA THE RULING ELITE: A Study in Imperialism, Genocide and Emancipation, 2011, Trafford Publishing


    Perhaps of interest –

    Fredrick Töben

    Fredrick Töben reviews:

    Elite Cover Deanna


    THE RULING ELITE: A Study in Imperialism, Genocide and Emancipation,

    2011, Trafford Publishing


    1. An INTRODUCTION – not quite a monumental detour but in Bernard Shaw's sense of a PREFACE that is longer than the play itself.

    While visiting friends in Sydney it was Seppl who reminded me that the Allies during World War Two and thereafter regarded one of Adolf Hitler's weaknesses to be his sentimentality. I was unaware that such state is considered to be a character flaw because for me sentimentality is a hall-mark of being civilised, of feeling at home within one's cultural environment where the body and mind are at one, where emotions and intellect are balanced.


    It is the generated folksiness of expressed emotions that give a society, a nation, freedom from economic/financial constraints. It is this quality that gives a nation its character, its people the moral and intellectual integrity where truth, honour, justice, among other civilising values, operate. Sentimentality transcends crass materialism and gives meaning to the maxim: wearing one's heart on one's sleeve. Unfortunately those who are not interested in the materialistic power kick, perhaps because of their personal sentimental journey, will always have to have their guard up when they meet the nihilistically-inspired materialistic vultures. More of this later.

    It is also a truism that where there is no trust, relationships break down and a society begins to rot and the naked power quest emerges as an aphrodisiac where the moral virtue of truth-telling is regarded as a failure of nerve. It does not surprise me then that the German National Socialists banned secrecy/exclusivity-obsessed Freemasonry as a foreign element within the German body politics. But there is another more fundamental matter they acted upon. On 21 April 1933, a day after Adolf Hitler's birthday, Germany outlawed kosher slaughter, thereby attacking to the core a fundamental Jewish religious observance, and Germans justifiably claimed that such barbaric practices are not to be tolerated nor conducted in the civilized German Reich.


    I find this historical fact helps in explaining why the Holocaust propaganda had to be developed against Germans: it deflects from this banning of kosher slaughter.  The issue is currently alive in Australia on account of the ABC 4 Corners TV program that showed how cattle are killed in Indonesian slaughterhouses. Interestingly, Muslims agree to stun cattle prior to killing, something Jews refuse to do claiming their religion demands kosher practices be observed. Australians are currently still under the kosher slaughter spell and there is no heart within government nor in the Opposition to force the issue and to legislate on banning it outright. This is puzzling to anyone who watched the 2 June 2011 ABC TV 4 Corner's program because I would have thought that spell would have been broken by it – watching a cow standing last in line awaiting slaughter, shivering in fear as she observed her mates being mutilated on the killing floor. Still, there are individuals who claim the animal world is incapable of feeling emotions – it's just an animal – cattle! But that's the hallmark of Jewish religious thought – to divide the world into Jews and non-Jews/Goyim!


    Interestingly, it is in the pre-verbal state of perceiving the world where a healthy instinct flourishes, and where any verbal con-job begins to unravel because there is a mismatch between physical phenomena and theoretical explanation.


    The current classic example of such deception is the 10th Anniversary celebrations of the 9/11 tragedy. The official narrative, adopted by the 'free-and-democratic' western world, is one of death and suffering and of overcoming such grief – at the same time re-enforcing the enemy image of those who were responsible for causing this tragedy – Muslim terrorists.


    It is now generally accepted by anyone who deeply looks into the physical events of 9/11 that what we physically observed on our television screens over-and-over, and what is passed off as the official story of what happened, is not synchronised. The non-verbal perceptions tell a different story to what we are offered. For example, on 8 September 2011 on Australia's SBS TV in a documentary peddling the official version of events, 'New York – The Centre of the World', journalist William Langewieshe claimed that Building 7 was brought down by oil-fire. It was obvious from his body language – eye lids flickering as he lied – that he himself didn't believe what he was saying. It got worse. A new version of events is floated: The Twin Towers were brought down by burning paper contained in those countless offices and not a word about this being a controlled demolition job.


    When such nonsense is peddled in a serious film I simply reflect on the rubbish we have heard for decades from so-called Holocaust survivors who are so good at telling their tales of horror. Remember the ABC Good Morning America segment of 18 February 2009 where Herman Rosenblat for a decade celebrated himself, and his wife Rosa, as concentration camp survivors? As a little girl she would daily throw an apple to him through the fence. Years later they met on a blind date in New York and he proposed 'on the spot'.





    GMA: Why did you tell such a big lie…?

    Rosenblat: It was not a lie. It was my imagination, and in my imagination, in my mind, I believed it. Even now I believe it that she was there and she threw the apple to me.

    GMA: How can you say it wasn't a lie? It wasn't true. You know it wasn't true.

    Rosenblat: Yes, it wasn't true but in my imagination it was true.

    GMA: Herman and Rosa Rosenblatt told their false story publicly for more than a decade but it all fell apart about six weeks ago after Holocaust scholars proved it was physically impossible for prisoners to approach the fence at the concentration camp where Herman was kept and that Rosa's family was actually more than 200 miles away.

    GMA: Why did your wife go along with this? Did she ever express any reservations?

    Rosenblat: Because she loves me! … She loves me so much that if she thinks that's good for me she'll go along with it.


    The 9/11 commemorations are following the narrative of the grieving pattern set by Holocaust remembrances that culminated in 1993 when the US taxpayer-funded US Holocaust Memorial Museum opened its doors in Washington.


    The climate change controversy, which aims to establish a global tax system so as to guarantee a steady tax flow to the UN and other imperial/global power aspirants, such as the World Bank and the IMF, is using the Talmudic dialectic in order to eliminate any climate sceptics' murmurings, as illustrated by the following brief article:



    Climate skeptics 'like racists', David Gardner, Los Angeles. The Advertiser, 31 August 2011

    Al Gore caused controversy yesterday by comparing sceptics of global warming to racists. The former US vice-president recalled how society succeeded in marginalising racists in the civil rights area, and said climate-change sceptics must be defeated in the same way. Mr Gore claimed those questioning the veracity of climate-change science would be seen in the same negative light. "There came a time when racist comments would come up in conversation and in years past they were just natural," he said. "Then there came a time when people would say 'Why do you talk that way?' and slowly the conversation was won. We have to win the conversation on climate."

    Mr Gore has been accused of exaggerating climate-change risks for his own political gain and conservative critics have claimed scientific research is skewed to play on the fears of the public. Last year, climate scientists working for the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change came under fire for exaggerating the threat of global warming. And in 2009, leaked emails from the University of East Anglia revealed scientists breached freedom of information laws by refusing to release raw temperature data.



    A couple of weeks ago I saw a television news report – I saw it on TV so it must be true! – about a motorised armed column making its way from Libya to Niger, which allegedly did not include the Libyan leader Gaddafi. I then thought of the 1993 column of fleeing Iraqi's trying to escape the hell-hole that for them had become Kuwait as the Anglo-American-Zionist war machine began its offensive to reclaim Kuwait from Iraqi occupation. The US set up Sadam Hussein, then tore him down and effected regime change, much to the delight of the Iranians.

    That human train of Iraqi and Palestinian civilians and military personnel stretching into the desert as far as the eye could see and desperately trying to reach Iraq was literally incinerated as the US war machine bombarded it to a standstill.


    The Iraq-Kuwait conflict had begun on a wink-and-a nod when Iraq was under the impression that the USA would not intervene were it to re-claim Kuwait as one of its wayward provinces. The now pathetic UN Security Council con-job of having a Kuwaiti teenager, primed by a notable American advertising agency, stand before it proclaiming that Iraqi forces were tearing babies from their incubators reminded Revisionists of the usual Holocaust horror stories that upon close scrutiny proved to be nothing but memory fiction – outright lies. But the initial shock of being confronted by such gruesome tales lasts long enough in politicians who switch off reason and become compliant to foreign interests. That, at least, is the sentiment expressed by American citizens who oppose the US military serving Israel's interests.


    The 19 March 2003 invasion and destruction of Iraq's infrastructure was based on the Weapons of Mass Destruction lie that served as a pretext to further humiliate Arab nationalism under the guise of bringing 'freedom-and-democracy' to the Middle East.


    Interestingly, wherever the Anglo-American-Zionist war machine operates it is quick to introduce its controlled supply of new currency. Two crate loads of US currency has disappeared without a trace in Iraq. Wasn't there some rumour that Rumsfeld just a day before 9/11 announced that the Pentagon's budget was unaccounted for by some trillions? Even the Libyan rebels saw how a couple of containers loaded with money arrived from Britain – perhaps printed by Thomas de la Rue! – it is allegedly from Libyan assets frozen by Britain. I shall resist the temptation of contemplating on the mechanism how money is created out of nothing in the first instance!


    Middle East politics is about resources – water and oil – but that is half the story. The other half concerns the bringing to fulfilment of Biblical prophecy. The so-called free-and-democratic western world is mainly Christian-oriented on whose back Judaism rides quite comfortably disseminating its own imperatives that Christian Zionists fervently embrace. For those who cannot embrace such transcendental directive, there is the secular version in the form of atheism and Freemasonry. In the latter case, globally each month every practising Freemason recites something about re-building King Solomon's temple in Jerusalem.


    The Israeli-directed archaeological diggings beneath the Al Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem/Al Quds recently found an artefact that allegedly proved there was Jewish habitation at that spot.


    Rare discovery, The Advertiser, 26 July 2011,

    A tiny golden bell – pulled after 2000 years from an ancient sewer beneath the Old City of Jerusalem – was unveiled by Israeli archaeologists, who hailed it as a rare find. The orb, one centimetre in diameter, has a small loop that appears to have been used to sew it on to the clothes of a wealthy city resident two millennia ago, archaeologists said on Sunday.


    This is ill-boding for the Muslims who worship in the mosque because rumour has it that all that tunnelling beneath the city will eventually cause the collapse of the mosque, a prerequisite if King Solomon's third temple is to be re-built. In fact, the temple already exists in parts that merely need to be assembled when the call is received that a pure red heifer, without the blemish of a white hair, has been born into this world.


    There is a pattern to this madness and it must be remembered that prior to the Kuwaiti tragedy, beginning in 1980, Iraq unwisely sided with the Anglo-American-Zionist war machine and acted as its proxy in a ten-year war against the Islamic Republic of Iran – which stood its ground because the 1979 Revolution had cleansed the political elite of individuals who would have, as members of the Saddam Hussein government had done, co-operated with the Anglo-American-Zionists. Anyone who plays power-politics with Iranians is wise to recall that the Ancient Persians invented the chess game!


    The Libyan tragedy lingers on as Wikileaks exposes the close connection existing between the Gaddafi government and British and US secret services in respect of facilitating Iraqi and Afghanistani renditions on Libyan soil. The 21 December 1988 Lockerby episode is also, of course, still a live issue, not because the alleged perpetrator of this tragedy had gained his release from a Scottish prison on humanitarian grounds but rather because the Pan Am Flight 103 tragedy is regarded by thoughtful and reflective individuals as another 'insider job'. This is, of course, one of the significant hall-marks of any declining empire that attempts to last a little longer – setting a new dialectic like facilitating a controlled demolition.


    Lockerby also served to bankrupt/terminate the great tradition-bearing world aviation icon Pan Am, perhaps thereby also heralding behind the scene and out of public gaze the deeper world financial ruptures that are so effectively hidden from sight and consideration by the 'shock-and-awe' pyrotechnics of 21st century warfare. As Captain Eric May reminded us, the image of Bagdad lighting up at night with mini nuclear weapons exploding is firmly fixed in most individuals' consciousness because global communications brought the tragedy into our living rooms.


    And today in the USA and elsewhere – mainly through the media in the countries that made up the coalition of the willing – there is sombre celebration amidst the dire warning that another imminent terrorist attack could happen – a revenge attack because the US seals killed Osama bin Laden a little while ago.


    It was heartening to see SBS TV screen a 2007 film Man on Wire, based on Frenchman Philippe Petit's 2002 book, To Reach The Clouds. After successfully walking on a steel cable stretched across the two Sydney Harbour Bridge towers, Petit, at 24 years of age did likewise a year later on 7 August 1974 from the top of the nearly completed WTC towers. From 10:30 pm to 1 am ABC TV screened live the 9/11 10th anniversary celebrations. It hurts to know that the official version of this event is an outright lie!


    When will this global madness end? It seems to me that such globally significant acts of terrorism can be paralleled to the working concept of 'Devil' in religious discourse. Unfortunately, most individuals who can tell if they are watching a controlled demolition – as was the case when the WTC Twin Towers and Building 7 came down – are otherwise prevented from voicing their views publicly. In a world where the terrorism dictatorship is expressed so directly – you are either with us or against us – and there is a faltering world economic climate, then self-preservation in the form of avoiding dissent on the terrorism issue is the norm.


    Here we see expressed the Talmudic death dialectic in full bloom, while the Hegelian life-giving dialectic brings with it a deeper appreciation, for example, of what causes 'terrorism'. After all, a terrorist for some is a 'freedom fighter' for another. This theme of emancipation from slavery features prominently within Spingola's book, which I reduce to even a simpler formula: the battle of the wills among individuals who live by differing value-systems.


    In any case, reflective individuals realize that such fabricated terrorists incidents as 9/11, 7/77, Oklahoma-Madrid-Bali bombings, etc.  are designed to deflect from the deeper economic issues that, for example, were current when during the 1930s depression the National Socialists  emerged in Germany. The Germans refused to submit to the then prevailing economic model of financial usury, and proclaimed autarky as a guiding principle for Germany's re-birthing process – and this meant that the country disconnected from the international financial system that till then had a stranglehold on Germany.

    I am reminded of the Australian incident that illustrates this problem somewhat. During the 1930s farmers in the State of Queensland, as elsewhere in the world, were saddled with crippling debt to their banks. A group of farmers marched to Brisbane and occupied state parliament for some hours and asked for government relief from the oppressive debt burden. The government refused, claiming it did not have the money to assist farmers. When a little later World War Two broke out suddenly there was money available to finance the war! And so the 'Pineapple Revolution' failed, and perhaps it was destined to fail because many of the farmers that made their way to Brisbane had German-sounding names!

    Most of the above matters raised become relevant when considering Deanna Spingola's book, and as usual when reviewing a book I retain the two basic categories: Form and Content.


    2. FORM

    This is a 670-page book and as the ISBN indicates it comes in three versions: soft cover, hard cover and electronic version:

    ISBN: 978-1-4269-5462-7 (sc), ISBN: 978-1-4269-5463-4 (hc), ISBN: 978-1-4269-6063-5 (e)


    Except for a few black and white prints of documents and individuals mentioned in the text the reader looking for pictures will find none. This is a heavy read, all text, and there's no picture-looking, except for the startling cover where at the lower half there is in darkened imagery a huge square populated conference table, like the UN Security Council setting.  Above hovers a globe of the world around which is bound a chain, from north to south and east to west, perhaps inadvertently forming a cross – one of the most significant symbols of our expressed common humanity. The conference floor is carpet red, and it can be imagined that the world hovering over this red carpet is hurtling towards the fiery abyss that it currently blocks out but which certainly could invoke an image of Dante's Inferno.


    A brief Acknowledgements section of four sentences has the author thank her family, publisher, editors and a list of persons who influenced her work, and a two-page Introduction precede the 3-page Contents section.


    The author states that her work could have been titled'The Ruling Psycho-Sociopaths' because her basic thesis is that the global ruling elite lives by other rules, i.e. 'Sociopaths or psychopaths survive by taking advantage of our ignorance and naivety … climb the ranks of most social hierarchies, habitually lie without remorse, and always say whatever is necessary to acquire position'.


    The 9 sections that make up the book's Contents are not numbered, and each section divides into sub-sections or chapters where the flood of details is unstoppable:

    The Banking and Industrial Elite – 9 chapters – p.1

    Social Engineering – 6 chapters – p.87

    Elitists and Secret Societies – 3 chapters – p.140

    Slavery and Emancipation – 7 chapters – p.162

    The Founders, Economics and Warfare – 12 chapters – p.228

    The Southern Scoundrels – 8 chapters – p.313

    Preparing for the Revolution – 9 chapters – p. 370

    America's Socialist Revolution – 16 chapters - 440

    Ethnic Cleansing in America – 10 chapters – p. 559.


    The 3-page Conclusion is followed by a 19-page INDEX, which I found a little wanting in places. Refreshingly I found there was no reference to Adolf Hitler, Nazis, the Holocaust or Auschwitz, though Ward Churchill's 1997 published book: A Little Matter of Genocide, Holocaust and Denial in the Americas 1492 to the Present, is referenced as footnote 1982. There is mention of the ADL, anti-semitism, Communism, Freemasons, French Revolution, Hegel, Kant, Ku Klux Klan, City of London, Karl Marx, JS Mill, Montesquieu, Napoleon, Pestalozzi, Douglas Reed, Cecil Rhodes, Rothschild Round Table, Schelling, Schopenhauer, Feuerback Herder, Metternich, Siemens, Max Weber, Voltaire, Weishaupt, Skull & Bones, slavery, typhoid/typhus, University Berlin-Jena-Leipzig-Chicago. Although mentioned in the text Joseph Conrad's name nor his book, 'Heart of Darkness' does not appear in the Index.


    There is no BIBLIOGRAPHY and instead there is the reliance on the old convention of continuous footnoting – 1998 footnotes! An oversight caused footnote 289 to be un-dated – unless there was no publishing date available, but then it should have been mentioned.


    Also, some names should have been included in the Index. I note, for example, Michael Hoffman whose works are mentioned in the footnotes but his name does not appear in the Index. Perhaps I'm still tied to the old mode of having a comprehensive Index, but as Arthur Butz once advised me when I sent him a copy of my 713-page Fight or Flight: The Personal Face of Revisionism that contains a 15-page Index: 'You don't expect me to read it!' Luckily I had a meticulous editor who refuses to use a computer-generated index and still prefers to do the job by hand, page by page. Still, the older I get the more I sympathise with Butz's view and in my books I try to include an index for those who want to short-circuit the reading process. Perhaps that's why some currently published books do away with an index so as to stop this short-cut activity.


    Proof-reading is excellent but I did find one spelling error that slipped by at p. 649, line 11 from bottom: 'co-called' should be 'so-called'. There was also the use of the verb 'hung' when it should have been 'hanged' – objects are 'hung' while people are 'hanged', so according to basic English usage; but this is also subject to development/decline as English simplifies to further adapt itself in its role as the universal language.


    3. CONTENT

    Where to begin? That's the problem when considering this tome and hence my above lengthy introduction and commentary to current events. After all, the book appears to me to be developing an understanding of what intellectual impulses are operating within the American psyche and where they came from, and with what consequences these impulses were turned into physical reality when today's United States of America was up for grabs as Europe prepared itself for opening up the new world for conquest and exploitation.


    That's the basic background thrust of the book, then to give a detailed account of the American intellectual heritage and how its roots go back to 15th and 16th century Europe, in particular to Bavaria where the Illuminate originated and where Talmudic impulses propelled individuals into action in the New World.


    A German on-line book service is already offering a book on Freemasons:Von Truman bis Breivik - wherein the link is made between US President Harry Truman, a Masonic Grand Master and Anders Behring Breivik, a Master Mason. Both men showed no regret for perpetrating horrendous acts against humanity: Truman, through an executive order on 6 August 1945, ordered the atomic bombing of Hiroshima, and on 22 July 2011 Breivik massacred 69 Norwegians; both killers aimed to establish a New World Order.

    Still, I have a worry when we talk about secret societies. On the one hand its members, and the general public, believe they are carrying secrets that are shared only among its members and not known by outsiders, but then in her book the author mentions countless names of individuals who make up the secret societies she illuminates. Does this confirm the notion that in time the truth will always out?


    The author claims that through the European Illuminate and Freemasonry organisations it is the Jewish networking and Talmudic-based thrustings that largely determined the physical conquest of the New World and the acquisition of its riches.


    If we move forward and consider the period in which the US capital, Washington, was planned, then of course Spingola proves her case, as was recently popularly revealed in Dan Brown's 2009 novel about Freemasonry – The Lost Symbol. Washington is a city full of Masonic symbolism, and this has expressed itself politically. On 25 May 2011 the Israeli prime Minister addressed the United States Congress and the embarrassing fawning of its members – was it 29 standing ovations? – indicated that the mix of Christian Zionists and Masonic affiliations has saturated and made Congress subservient to a foreign power.


    The claim that European universities, especially the German ones such as Leipzig and Berlin and Göttingen were hotbeds of Illuminati intellectual activity needs to be tempered a little by what was happening at other prominent German universities, such as Heidelberg and Tübingen. Hence my contention that the author's assertions need to be augmented by such consideration, and that to regard the impulses emanating from Weisshaupt's original musings, officially beginning on 1 May 1776 when he founded his Order of the  Illuminati,  have carried right through to this day. Certainly it was of importance that Weishaupt came from a Jewish family that converted to Catholicism, thereby synthesising these conceptual worlds into his Illuminati structure, which later was absorbed by the Jewish-directed Talmudic/Masonic thought structures.


    For example, Marxist thoughts and its dialectic materialism is a copy of what Talmudic thought is all about, primarily the dividing of the world into a crisp and uncompromising them-us: Jews and non-Jews, only for Marx it was atheistic class conflict that drove his dialectic materialism. The Jewish them-us is best expressed in Kol Nidre, the prayer for the beginning of Yom Kippur that offer an 'annulment of vows or a celebration of the deceptions to come':


    "All personal vows we are likely to make, all personal oaths and pledges we are likely to take between this Yom Kippur and the next Yom Kippur, we publicly renounce. Let them all be relinquished and abandoned, null and void, neither firm nor established. Let our personal vows, pledges and oaths be considered neither vows nor pledges nor oaths."


    Note that this year Yom Kippur begins at sundown on 7 October and endson Saturday, 8 October. This oath enables Jews to work, without conscience and good will, in a host nation, and it explains why such 'parasitic' behaviour has led to Jewish expulsions throughout these past thousand years. It explains why, when the Bolsheviks wrested political power from the Russian people, one of the first enacted laws criminalised as a capital offence acts of 'antisemitism'.

    A recent news item further illustrates this mindset's structure:


    Court tables ruling in 'mesira' contempt case, JTA, September 8, 2011

    A federal court judge said she will rule at a later date in the case of a Chasidic Jew who will not testify because he says it would violate "mesira," the injunction against turning Jews over to non-Jews. Margaret Morrow of the U.S. District Court in Los Angeles heard arguments Wednesday in the case involving Rabbi Moshe Zigelman. Prosecutors want Morrow to imprison Zigelman for contempt unless he testifies against others in an alleged tax fraud scheme that involved his Spinka sect, The Los Angeles Times reported.  Zigelman, an executive assistant to the sect's leader, already has served a 2-year sentence for his role in the scheme, which involved soliciting large tax-deductible donations and secretly funneling most of the money back to the donors. Zigelman, 64, says his testimony would violate "mesira," although most modern scholars say it applies only in regimes that oppress Jews.


    I call the Talmudic-Marxist dialectic a death dialectic because Marx himself claimed to have turned Hegel upside down. It was Hegel who regarded the highest form of human development to be from the material base to the spiritual – the symbolic pyramid where the Idea reigns supreme. Marx opposed any transcendence and advocated the dictatorship of the proletariat, and to this day you can see individuals, who are afflicted by such thought-structure, lacking any civilising virtues on account of their rejecting idealism. Hence for the Marxist the truth-concept has no existential value, does not exist. Truth is what you make it!


    Interestingly, in the current political climate the outgrowth of all this is the human rights movement that seems to seek to impose a kind of dictatorship, and if that does not work, then the claim of victimhood is made out. Such is the nature of the dictatorial mindset that operates on the Talmudic-Marxist dialectic thought-pattern.


    Spingola briefly mentions the Hegelian dialectic but then actually continues to refer to the Marxist death dialectic that does not compromise as does Hegel's life-giving dialectic which, for example, sets up a thesis, then the antithesis and as these opposites interact they form a synthesis that conserves elements of both the thesis and antithesis. This is best explained by man-woman = child, the latter conserves in itself half of the two opposites that produce it. The Marxist dialectic has opposites clashing in a life-death struggle with one killing the other: man-woman = androgynous individual. The current gay-rights movement attempts to overcome its biological limitations through legal-verbal rhetoric as campaigns are mounted to sanction same-sex marriages and parenthood.

    Within the legal sphere it was Christopher Steele who formulated it thus:'Do I tell the truth or do I obey the law?

    The Talmudic-Marxists state that the law must be obeyed while the Hegelians would claim morally upright citizens must do both – tell the truth and obey the law.

    By merely obeying the law moral and intellectual cowardice develops, and we saw this rise and then break down as did the Marxist-Communist ideology until 1989 in the former Soviet Union and its satellites.

    Now, Spingola, it appears to me, would only partially agree with such an analysis because her contention is that elites that control world events live by different rules to those who do not belong to any known elites.

    Again, this in parts reminds me of Marx's false consciousness that he embraces as he develops his class-conflict theory. A person may claim to belong to an elite group, and be regarded by others as belonging to an elite but that then is easily refuted by close scrutiny of what such an elite person/organisation is all about. I think the author points out the essence of what makes an elite to be the establishing of a physical domination and exploitation/ exercise of power over individuals. It could be said that the above mindset is thus essentially an ideological/religious matter stemming from the Abrahamic religions: Judaism, Christianity, Islam.


    I consider it helpful if we broaden and augment the intellectual framework by introducing the basic philosophical concepts of: British Empiricism – moving from one particular to the next without ever reaching an over-arching understanding of what theoretical concepts control human behaviour, which is partially what basic scientific research is all about, i.e. being open to new and non-theory-laden impulses; French Rationalism – meticulously developing a beautifully logical coherent abstract explanatory rational structure that, if the premise on which it rests is false, then reveals itself to be a mere smoke-and-mirror apparition, as we note when scientists develop ideologies such as those structures that are supposed to 'prove' climate change/global warming/the existence of HIV, etc.; and German Idealism – beginning with romantic notions of love, trust, justice, honour, God, etc. all serving as the motor of one's personal expression of values within a worldview/Weltanschauung that politically leads to the Volksgemeinschaft where an inclusive/evolutionary/genetic theory of knowledge works with nature and not against nature. A mixture of all three forms the essence of European thought. All three, it can be said, gave rise to the New World, the subject matter of Spingola's book, and are giving rise to the currently emerging NEW WORLD ORDER! Within this context the Talmudic mystery-mongering and deception mechanisms are merely notorious distractions, if not disaster-producing parasitic thinking that's merely piggy-backing on European thought-structures.


    But let's end this review before I write more of what I think. It is in this respect that I found Deanna Spingola's book refreshingly stimulating and worthy of a re-read. Many issues she raises need more reflection, and that is much appreciated, especially because in her research she names the names that are the carriers and advocates of the Illuminati thought structure, and which make up the various elite groups that perpetrated the enslavement and genocides.

    Goroke - 11 September 2011.


    Postscript: Interestingly, from Peter Wakefield Sault I received a copy of his 13 September 2011 email with the comments that also broaden the issues that Spingola addresses in her book:

    From: Peter Wakefield Sault

    Sent: Tuesday, 13 September 2011 8:37 AM

    Subject: Re: Fw: Probability of another false-flag is high...

    I have come to realize that Zionism is a product of Freemasonry more than it is of Judaism. As far as I can discern, the Rothschilds - the High Table of Judaism - have used their Jewishness to mislead Low and Middle Table Jews and to pursue Masonic aims. It is Freemasonry that wants the Muslims off the Jerusalem acropolis so it can "rebuild" the mythical Temple of "Solomon" (actually Sol-Amon, or Amon-Ra) and Hiram Abid.

    Somewhere along the line, between 50,000 and 250,000 years of Egyptian (and World) history were sent down the Pharaonic memory hole (the memory hole was a Pharaonic device usually reserved for individuals) and the 'Tanakh' was put in its place, so this is an ancient conspiracy that we are looking at, going back perhaps some 2,500 years. Alexander attempted it but got lost in Afghanistan and ended up in India instead of China. This conspiracy involves the conquest of the Great Circle Way, whose western terminator is Liberia. Western Freemasonry, the Rome-London-Washington triumvirate, has pretty much conquered as far as the High Pass through the Himalayas via Kashmir, with a few gaps yet to be attacked, such as Tehran (which itself lies on the Great Circle Way) and now, apparently, Egypt. The High Pass is China's back door. It is in Kashmir that it is most likely that tactical nuclear weapons will first be used.

    The core of the conspiracy appears to rotate around an homosexual pedophile human-sacrificing "priesthood", for pederasty formed a part of Masonic Greek (i.e. Heliopolitan) culture. Cultures controlled by Freemasons are characterized by piles of dressed stone and human sacrifice (Freemasonry at its core is all about the design and construction of sacrificial altars but I won't go into the whole deal here as it is long and complex).


    And thus the final word on what drives the world into disasters and suffering has not been spoken. FT.





    Fun stuff to read, tell and watch:

    Now FREE to watch all 91 minutes: "Defamation," from Israeli filmmaker Yoav Shamir. LINK:

    Some of His Best Friends Are Jewish: The Saga of a Holocaust Revisionist By Nathaniel Popper. Link: Israeli lawyer has filed a class-action lawsuit against former President Jimmy Carter, seeking $5 million in damages because his book "Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid" allegedly defamed Israel. Link:

    "...when you have laws against questioning the Holocaust narrative, you are screaming at the other person to stop thinking!!!" ---Mike Santomauro. *Anthony Lawson's Holocaust Video "were the Germans so stupid"... Link:

    An anti-Semite condemns people for being Jews, I am not an anti-Semite.--Mike Santomauro. Link:

    Start reading DEBATING THE HOLOCAUST in under a minute:


    Mike Santomauro
    Editorial Director
    Call anytime: 917-974-6367

    Recent Activity:

    Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.