Thank you for having posted this exchange Michael. I have disagreed with Mark on several occasions. On this point I agree with him. This paragraph represents revisionist pilpul very nicely. Mark says "do not necessarily represent". Therefore take us off your excrement list. We publish all sides! So, Mark makes the site available to ever more people. People who are sufficiently intelligent to discover who is swindling them. I would encourage regular references in IHR online material to other sites; CODOH, ReportersNotebook, etc.... One URL opens up many hours of reading and investigation. That is our goal is it not? Revisionism is an IQ test. Perhaps that is why our Universities are in such sad shape. Someone has opened the inquisitive circuit in many brains.
On 2/7/2011 7:01 PM, Michael wrote:
Mark Weber says:
The "Holocaust Revisionism" items you cite do not necessarily represent the view or policy of the IHR. In fact, many other items posted on the IHR website are critical of "Holocaust Revisionism," or present a "non-revisionist" view of the Holocaust. Indeed, the IHR website presents divergent and sometimes conflicting views on a wide range of issues, including the Holocaust.
Peace.Michael Santomauro@ 917-974-6367
What sort of TRUTH is it that crushes the freedom to seek the truth?