Sep 27, 2014

How EVIL works in Justice Cooper's court ...

Sept. 27, 2014
Happy Birthday --- Mikey. LOVE you and miss you. Each birthday you have you will get to understand better... I wish I can celebrate with you and hug you ...

PS: Fanaticism is now mainstream in the legal community, that it is affecting my divorce case:
When a Judge (or the lawyers) loses his or her objectivity, then the truism applies:
Everything is religious, everything is political.
Justice Matthew F. Cooper: Sending me this about "The Fucking Jews"
Mr. Santomauro: No, actually, it was the opposite of that. It was "Fuck the Arabs" in the essay.
Sandra Schpoont (Attorney for my 11 year old son): Oh, that's better.
Madelyn Jaye:: (Attorney for my ex-wife): Oh, that's better.
Steven Mandel (Attorney for my ex-wife): That's better.
Justice Matthew F. Cooper: Oh, that's better.
Letter from The Mandel Law Firm (Steven J. Mandel) 12-9-13
Justice Matthew F. Cooper: "Is that [Jewish] agenda to dilute the Aryan race?" On page 20:


Fanaticism is now mainstream in the legal community, that it is affecting my divorce case:

When a Judge (or the lawyers) loses his or her objectivity, then the truism applies:
Everything is religious, everything is political.

Justice Matthew F. Cooper:  Sending me this about "The Fucking Jews"
Mr. Santomauro: No, actually, it was the opposite of that. It was "Fuck the Arabs" in the essay.
Sandra Schpoont (Attorney for my 11 year old son): Oh, that's better.
Madelyn Jaye:(Attorney for my ex-wife): Oh, that's better.
Steven Mandel (Attorney for my ex-wife): That's better.
Justice Matthew F. Cooper: Oh, that's better.

Letter from The Mandel Law Firm (Steven J. Mandel) 12-9-13

Justice Matthew F. Cooper: "Is that [Jewish] agenda to dilute the Aryan race?" On page 20: 


My essay in question:

+The Myth of the Innocent Civilian

"Justice Matthew F. Cooper has distorted, invented or misremembered almost every significant claim and phrase. In particular, 'Jewish conspiracy' is completely false, in spirit and in word.

"It is serious and upsetting. Rather than correct a smear, Justice Cooper has attempted, perhaps not surprisingly, to justify one smear with another in the same direction.

"Michael Santomauro promotes the ideal of "scientific journalism" – where the underlaying evidence of all articles is available to the reader precisely in order to avoid these type of distortions. Michael Santomauro treasurse his strong Jewish support  just as he treasures the support from pan-Arab democracy activists and others who share the hope for a just world." --I.S.

Michael Santomauro
Cell: 917-974-6367

"An anti-Semite condemns people for being Jews, I am not an anti-Semite."--Michael Santomauro. 

Sep 22, 2014

Super-strong neodymium magnets crushing a man's hand

How It's Made Magnets

KTVA reporter quits on-air, reveals herself as owner of Alaska Cannabis ...


ANCHORAGE, Alaska — Viewers of the KTVA-TV 10 p.m. news on Sunday got quite a surprise when reporter Charlo Greene not only outed herself as the owner of a medical marijuana business, but also promptly quit on the air.
Greene did a story on the Alaska Cannabis Club, without revealing her connection to it. Afterwards, she announced that she was the club’s owner and was quitting her job at the station.
“Now everything you heard is why I, the actual owner of the Alaska Cannabis Club, will be dedicating all of my energy to fighting for freedom and fairness, which begins with legalizing marijuana here in Alaska,” she said. “And as for this job, well, not that I have a choice but, (expletive) it, I quit.”
The club aims to increase access to medical marijuana in Alaksa. The Alaska Dispatch News describes the club as operating within a “gray area” in the state’s medical marijuana laws. The state will vote on legalizing recreational marijuana use later this year.
KTVA-TV’s news director later apologized for the incident on the station’s Facebook page, adding that Greene no longer worked at the station.

KTVA reporter quits on-air, reveals herself as owner of Alaska Cannabis ...

A Dog Rescue Video That Will Make You Laugh, Smile & Believe In True Love!

Sep 14, 2014

Rather Outrageous Suppression of the Main Motive for 9/11 Attacks

Does the CIA Believe Obama?

Does the CIA Believe Obama? 
Philip Giraldi
... I know of no former or current intelligence official who believes that the expansion of NATO into Eastern Europe was a good idea, that toppling Bashar al-Assad would bring anything but chaos, or that bombing ISIS will actually accomplish anything. Given the current national security environment, I think I can state with some certainty that a solid majority of lower and mid-level employees would regard the administration responses to the ongoing series of crises, including both Ukraine and ISIS, as poorly conceived and executed. 

Sep 11, 2014

Woody Harrelson 'Ethos Time to Unslave Humanity


100% WTC Drone Strike Plane PROOF (Many Witnesses)

Sen. Cruz booed at In Defense of Christians Dinner

"'Those who hate Israel hate America,' he continued, as the boos and calls for him to leave the stage got louder. 'Those who hate Jews hate Christians. If those in this room will not recognize that, then my heart weeps. If you hate the Jewish people you are not reflecting the teachings of Christ. And the very same people who persecute and murder Christians right now, who crucify Christians, who behead children, are the very same people who target Jews for their faith, for the same reason.'"

Top 3 Best Eagle Attacks (OWL, DEER & WOLF)

Fred Leuchter in hindsight!

From: Friedrich Paul Berg 
Date: Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:24 PM
Subject: Fred Leuchter in hindsight!

By focusing attention on the alleged homicidal Nazi gas chambers, Fred Leuchter did something enormously valuable. How many others, even among revisionists, would have ever been so brazen and bold as to actually knock chunks of wall and stucco from supposed gas chambers in communist Poland? Leuchter also stimulated further serious work by many others such as myself, Germar Rudolf, Tom Kues, Carlo Mattogno and many others. But when Leuchter generalizes to claim that mass gassings are categorically impossible under any circumstances, anywhere, ever--he goes far beyond his own extremely specialized and limited grasp of technology and reality. He also undermines nearly everyone else. Why bother with any further research at all when Faurisson and Leuchter have already solved everything for us? Just repeat Faurisson's nine-word challenge as a kind of mantra. Did any of the courts in which Leuchter testified for Zuendel believe his claims? Of course, not!

Leuchter has become a Pied Piper to nowhere just like Robert Faurisson has on all technical issues. By insisting that mass gassings are IMPOSSIBLE, they both undermine the real research that is still needed into questions like where were railroad gas chambers actually located in addition to places I identified thirty years ago--before anyone heard of Leuchter. Warsaw, perhaps? Malkinia? Maidanek? Minsk? Brest-litovsk? Or, even the railyard at Birkenau itself? If not, why not? Those issues should be the focus of some funding and real research--and not the absurdities of "impossible gassings" that any sane person knows are not impossible at all. The claim of Leuchter that "Mass Gassings of people with anything are impossible!" is I-N-S-A-N-E ! There is no nice way to massage the issue. There is no happy, middle-of-the-road way to respond to such craziness. I wish there were some happy way to tell the necessary truth--but I am not smart enough to figure that one out. Sorry, folks!

Friedrich Paul Berg
Learn everything at
Nazi Gassings Never Happened! Niemand wurde vergast!

There were NO "limited gassings." There were NO homicidal Nazi Gassings at all!
Please send some generous support to:

The Holocaust story is a hoax because 1) no one was killed by the Nazis in gas chambers, 2) the total number of Jews who died in Nazi captivity is miniscule compared to what is alleged.

Bruce Leichty ...PRESS RELEASE / Lawyer Sanctioned for Anti-Semitism Will Host Christopher Bollyn at 9/11 Event

Lawyer Sanctioned for Anti-Semitism Will Host Christopher Bollyn at 9/11 Event

Los Angeles, CA  – (9/7/13) – Christopher Bollyn, author of Solving 9/11:  The Deception That Changed The World, will speak at a free event in  San Dimas Saturday, September 13 as part of a California speaking tour, planners announced today.   The event is open to the public.  
The two-hour event will be held at 6:30 p.m. at Michelangelo's Pizza,  552 W. Arrow Hwy., San Dimas (western Los Angeles County).    
Bollyn, a former American journalist currently living in Europe, operates the website   In his 2012 book Solving 9/11 he laid out evidence that “9/11 was an act of false flag terrorism carried out by Israeli military intelligence and Zionist fifth columnists” (from the Preface).    After researching and writing about the discovery of thermite at the site of the World Trade Center attacks in 2001 in New York, Bollyn sustained injury inflicted by police officers at his Illinois home in 2006, and after failing to get justice in the state courts he decided he could not protect his freedom or family in the U.S.     
In San Dimas he will be hosted and introduced by Bruce Leichty, a California attorney who represented 9/11 widow Ellen Mariani in litigation in New York and New Hampshire between 2007 and 2013.   Leichty and Mariani were sanctioned by a federal court of appeals for being “anti-semitic” after they notified that court of connections between the Tel Aviv-based lawyer son of New York federal judge Alvin K. Hellerstein and 9/11 defendants Boeing and ICTS, an Israeli-owned company that provided airport security at Boston's Logan Airport.  Both companies were being sued by the Mariani Estate in Hellerstein's Manhattan courtroom.  
It was Bollyn's research about the connections between Hellerstein's son's law firm and ICTS that led in part to the motion resulting in sanctions imposed against both Leichty and Mrs. Mariani, but Leichty says that these sanctions were unjustified.   “This was a `message' sent to us in a very anomalous opinion of  only two appellate judges, one of whom was married to an editor—Lincoln Kaplan--of a journal that had always refused to cover Mariani's lawsuit or 9/11 truth issues generally, the New York Times.”   The only coverage the New York Times ever gave to Mariani's case was to the 2013 order imposing sanctions.       
Bollyn served as chair of the Ellen Mariani Legal Defense Fund in an unsuccessful effort by Leichty in 2012 to obtain U.S. Supreme Court review of the adverse settlement forced on Mariani, who last saw her husband Louis Neil Mariani before he boarded United Air Lines Flight 175 the morning of 9/11/2001.     
More recently Bollyn has unearthed and published on his website evidence that Boeing has sought an FAA regulatory exception for use of “remote control” technology in its planes.   Bollyn has also written in 2014 on the two Malaysian Air Lines planes that either disappeared or were shot down, and links between those events and Israelis also linked to 9/11.
Bollyn will also be speaking in San Diego the following evening, Sunday, September 14, at 6:30 p.m. at the Joyce Beers Community Center, 3900 Vermont
Street, sponsored by San Diegans for 9/11 Truth.   At the latter event he will lead a discussion after the San Diego premiere of “Anatomy of a Great Deception”  (the film will not be featured at the San Dimas event).   Bollyn's book will be sold at both presentations.
Stated Leichty, “Christopher Bollyn is doing ground-breaking work that no one else is doing.  He has been attacked for it, and he has been denied fair treatment in the judicial system just as occurred with my client, Ellen Mariani.”   
“Neither of us are anti-semitic.   Neither of us are motivated by hostility toward Jews because simply they are Jews.   Our adversaries have attempted to construct false realities, but we will resist these depictions with information.   
“We are both Christians who believe that speaking truth to power sometimes takes precedence over the risk of being misunderstood, and that Americans need to question and examine a false national narrative--irrespective of the implications and precisely because of the implications.”     

The Myth of the Innocent Civilian

+The Myth of the Innocent Civilian

Sep 10, 2014

Exposing the fraud of 9/11 in 22 minutes

Face to Face with Elizabeth Woodworth and 9/11 Consensus

General Wesley Clark: Wars Were Planned - Seven Countries In Five Years

911 Commission - Trans. Sec Norman Mineta Testimony

9/11: The Myth and The Reality - FEATURE FILM

AZK - Sylvia Stolz - Lawyer Who Was Jailed for Presenting Evidence in th...

A German friend sent me this 44' video which is in German along with a rough translation in English.

It happens that "Stolz" means "pride" and that "stolz" means "proud".

Sylvia Stolz was Ernst Zündel's lawyer. In court she showed such courage that she was
arrested, sent to prison for more than three years and had no right anymore to be a lawyer
for five years.

We call her "the German Joan of Arc".

She is married to Horst Mahler, who is currently in jail serving a twelve-year prison sentence
for revisionism.

Congresswoman Jane Harman Caught Lobbying for AIPAC (Pro Israel Lobby In...

What Did Israel Know in Advance of the 9/11 Attacks?

From Michael Santomauro
Sept. 10, 2014                                 

Persuasive evidence exists (see Christopher Ketcham’s High-Fivers and Art Student Spies) that Israeli intelligence was aware of the 9/11 plot well in advance. Not only were Israeli agents found to be tracking alleged Muslim plotters, there was “intense political pressure apparently … brought to bear” to release the five Israeli spies caught filming the event, without any acknowledgment of foreknowledge on their part. Congress never investigated the incident. Nor was there an investigation of the Israeli art students, trained in military intelligence, who allegedly “attempted to form friendships with [New York] federal employees, photograph their offices, tap their phone lines and infiltrate their databases” in 2001, as reported by Nathan Guttman ofHa`aretz 

None of these issues was mentioned in the official 9/11 Commission report.  

There was also a great deal of pressure on the media not to discuss these events: 

A former ABC News employee high up in the network newsroom told [Ketcham] that when ABC News ran its June 2002 exposé on the celebratory New Jersey Israelis, "Enormous pressure was brought to bear by pro-Israeli organizations"—and this pressure began months before the piece was even close to airing.  

Fox News reports by Carl Cameron were also fiercely opposed by Jewish activists.  

The attack against Cameron and Fox News was spearheaded by a pro-Israel lobby group called the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America (CAMERA), which operated in tandem with the two most highly visible powerhouse Israel lobbyists, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (itself currently embroiled in a spy scandal connected to the Defense Department and Israeli Embassy). "CAMERA peppered the *** out of us." …According to a source at Fox News Channel, the president of the ADL, Abraham Foxman, telephoned executives at Fox News' parent, News Corp., to demand a sit-down in the wake of the Cameron reportage. The source said that Foxman told the News Corp. executives, "Look, you guys have generally been pretty fair to Israel. What are you doing putting this stuff out there? You're killing us." The Fox News source continued, "As good old boys will do over coffee inManhattan, it was like, well, what can we do about this? Finally, Fox News said, 'Stop the e-mailing. Stop slamming us. Stop being in our face, and we'll stop being in your face—by way of taking our story down off the web. We will not retract it; we will not disavow it; we stand by it. But we will at least take it off the web.'" Following this meeting, within four days of the posting of Cameron's series on Fox, the transcripts disappeared, replaced by the message, "This story no longer exists."[Ketcham] 

But what if Israeli involvement extended beyond espionage and advance warning, to ensuring the event would have maximum impact, or even to planning the operation? It is not unreasonable to inquire whether Israel and its operatives in the US may have at least taken steps to ensure that the attack would result in enough destruction and loss of life to create the political impetus for a war against Israel’s enemies, secure in the knowledge that public discussion of these issues could be suppressed. 

Sadly, many who understand that the mainstream media and our political elites cannot be trusted to provide the truth on historical events are remarkably credulous when it comes to 9/11. Belief in the official account of 9/11 is common even among many who know of other egregious cases where truth has been concealed, as in Israel's role in events like the destruction of theUSS Liberty and the critical role of the Israel Lobby in promoting the Iraq war within the Bush administration. The general public has been quick to swallow the government’s story, though it fails to explain how, among other things, the two skyscrapers hit by aircraft were rapidly and explosively destroyed in ways inconsistent with gravity-based collapse.   

The official story is still synchronously parroted by the media, permitting no mainstream journalist since 9/11 to report on any of the many glaring contradictions in the account.   
Obfuscating Science 

Since 2009, newly released evidence and physical analysis increasingly indicate that explosives were used to bring down the World Trade Center twin towers and WTC 7.  But you won't learn of it through the mainstream media. Whoever they are, the perpetrators of 9/11 have it in their best interest to keep the public distracted and unaware of basic principles of physics.  

The National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST), its hand forced by a recent Freedom of Information Act suit, reluctantly released this video of firefighters describing three explosions that occurred after the second plane hit, but before either tower "collapsed," and that destroyed the WTC tower lobby where the men stood. Hundreds of other emergency responders and survivors, all of whom were interviewed by the 9/11 Commission, and all of whom were inexplicably excluded from its report, witnessed explosions. 

Physics instructor David Chandler’s YouTube videos discuss compelling evidence of explosives being used to demolish the towers.  One video deals with sound evidence for explosions.  Others cover sequential explosions that eject debris and accelerate down the walls of the North Tower, as if by a detonation sequence (also seen here).  These explosive ejections are nearly cloaked by a descending canopy of falling concrete and steel, though the canopy lags slightly, giving cameras a view of the ejections. 

Chandler also demonstrates that the North Tower top block (the part above the plane impact) fell at around 64 percent of the acceleration of gravity, necessarily implying that no more than about 36 percent of the top block’s weight, and therefore its potential energy, was available to crush the bottom block, i.e., the remainder of the building.  This does not appear to have been sufficient energy to lead to collapse of the entire building, even if part of its steel structure were weakened by fire.     

Chandler further shows how debris fragments projected from the south towersuddenly change direction in midair, requiring momentum-changing forces likely resulting from explosions in the fragments themselves.   

Such explosions may be explained by prior placement of nanothermite or another suitable explosive in the towers, possibly mixed in paint or fireproofing or embedded in ceiling tiles. Nine scientists reported finding nanothermite(an explosive agent) in the tower dust collected from multiple locations in Manhattan (see also here).  

Professional engineer Jon Cole shows in videos (part 1 and part 2) how a gravity-driven collapse would have produced a deceleration, or "jolt," in theNorth Tower top block's descent when it hit the bottom block.  That didn't happen. Chandler explains it further. 
At minimum, a proper investigation is warranted, as is called for by more than 1300 professional architects and engineers 

Pardon Us for Asking 

Our government and media tell us that questioning 9/11 is inappropriate because it insults the families and memories of those killed in the attacks. Such a preposterous position has never been adopted by any law enforcement agency for a crime for which there has never been either a thorough or a forensic investigation.  Why should the crimes of 9/11 be the exception?

How scornfully must 9/11's masterminds laugh at us for believing that merely asking questions in an effort to solve the murders of nearly 3,000 people should be off-limits because it may hurt some family members' feelings?  The willingness of Americans to feel guilty for wanting answers to the largest mass murder on American soil reminds one of the "White guilt," imposed through relentless cultural assault by Jewish intellectual movements, that prompts White Europeans and Americans to greet gleefully their displacement through mass immigration and multiculturalism.   

Why might the media disallow any public questioning of the many unanswered aspects of 9/11?   

Could it be because Israeli special operations units may have carried out the attack? 

Former Director of Studies at the U.S. Army War College and Marine veteran Alan Sabrosky, PhD, thinks so.  So does investigative journalist Christopher Bollyn (interview here). 

If enough people try to connect the dots, perhaps 9/11's real killers can be brought to justice and another such attack prevented.