From: <jimwdean@aol.com >
Date: Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 6:59 PM
Subject: Heritage TV...Atlanta... RE: Santamauro
To: oliver.kamm@thetimes.co.uk
Date: Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 6:59 PM
Subject: Heritage TV...Atlanta.
To: oliver.kamm@
Dear Mr. Kamm,
I don't know what you have been reading about Mr. Santamauro but I assume it says he is in the holocaust denier realm...and new "N" word invention by the Jewish Lobby constructed to virtually lynch people...or the Neo-Yellow Star of David. It is sad indeed to see jewish folks adapt Nazi tactics.
I have known him for years and can tell you categorically that it is not true. I don't know if you are jewish or not but I have found that most jews don't care whether such claims are true or not. The opportunity to do some goyim bashing in public, to keep the others in line with proper thinking, is something that just can't be passed up.
As for Irving ( I have seen him in Atlanta a few times and videoed some of his talks) ... all he is guilty of is being targeted by the Jewish Lobby and going the independent publishing route. In the Lipdstadt trial transcripts/depositions, which he amazingly put out on a daily basis, there are two gems that I remembered.
First, when Lipstadt sent her first draft in to her 'handlers' they sent it back asking for a rewrite to include more nasty stuff on Irving with the explanation that he was 'their' biggest threat due to his stellar international reputation as a WWII historian. Lipstadt had been paid $25,000 to wright the book. This 'extra material' was not dug up by her, but supplied to her via her handlers...the silly stuff about the big portrait of Hitler in Irving's office (not true)....and his father having fought with Franco (not true)...material supplied by the British Board of Deputies and via Israeli Intel sources interested in keeping the lid in certain things like the British Board of Deputies supporting the Zionist terrorists while they were killing Tommies, and the Zionists working with the Nazis in WWWII.
Second, when Irving was on one of his American tours he was scheduled to be on a Washington, DC TV show which the ADL tried to have canceled...their usual good neighbor deal. To their credit the producers said no thanks to the ADL Klansmen...but did get the studio to have an ADL person on the show with Irving (something I have never seen American media do for Zionist critics). This ADL guy in his report to the home office on the show wrote...'Irving is definitely not an anti-semite but we will have to call him one anyway'. This is another example of their good neighbor/welcome to America policy
These are just two gems. The trial is filled with archival proof on Jewish Lobby machinations against Irving...but censored out of the US media of course as it is well infiltrated with Israeli assets who keep an eye on things just as you would expect an occupation army media to do.
Despite Irving's sham conviction, the trial transcript is an absolutely devastating record of Jewish Lobby black ops against those not considered 'right thinkers'.
But Irving is just the tip of the iceberg. The Neturie Karta Jews in New York (I have extensively interviewed Rabbi Weiss) have archival material on the Zionists which is just devastating. Our own declassified Intel on Israel is also just devastating. I show it to vets and retired intel people and they are just astounded at the deception of the American public.
I was just doing a year end piece that involved Count Folk Bernadotte's assassination in September 17, 1948 by the Zios.
At the time it was pawned off on extremists, the Lehi/Stern Gang, which was disbanded/absorbed afterward into the Israeli army. The actual trigger man, Yehoshua Cohen, put six rounds into the Count and 17 rounds into the unfortunate French Col. Serot, who had switched places with Swedish General Lunsdrom who had been targeted as an anti-semite (the cure for Zionist terrorist at the time being a death sentence). Col. Serot had wanted to thank Berndotte for helping rescue his wife from the Dachau concentration camp.
Cohen soon afterward became David Ben-Gurion's personal bodyguard. Before Cohen died (1986), he made the following statement: "With the Bernadotte action, Ben Gurion was able to kill two flies with one swat, he got rid of Bernadotte and us (the Stern Gang)."
Stern Gang leader Natan Yalin-Mor, became the first Knesset member for the Stern gang (those amnesties are wonderful things). Yitzhak Shamir, who also led assasination squad, went on to be Prime Minister after Begin.
Yehoshua Zettler, leader of the Count Benadotte assassination team...died May 20th, 2009 at age 91
None of the shooters ever spent a day in jail. Only two Stern gang members did about two weeks of jail before they were pardoned, but only for being members of a terrorist organization, not for killing Bernadotte. None of these people ever regretted what they had done. Actually it enhanced their careers as being a former Zionist terrorist was always a resume enhancer. The Irgun has a memorial website that is still up. But former capos and Warsaw block commanders, who worked with the Nazis, later because political wheels in Israel.
Ruthlessness was also considered a resume enhancer.
German cover letter from January 11, 1941 attached to a description of an offer for an alliance with Nazi Germany attributed to Lehi.
But David Irving and Michael Sanamauro...now we are to believer are some real bad characters...really dangerous...because of what they think. Bernadotte was killed because he was going to recommend sanctions against the Israelis and opposed their colonial military conquest as destabilizing to the region.
But the Zionists today, and their helpers here, have always worked together to destroy people that oppose their policies. Only their methods have changed. And they have more than a few helpers in media and journalism willing to help them. It actually helps them work their way up the career ladder.
So don't kid yourself for a minute about who is low man on the pole among Santamauro, Irving and you.
But don't feel bad...you have lots of company.
Jim Dean
Heritage TV, Atanta
Assoc. of Former Intelligence Officers
--
NOW AN AMAZON KINDLE BOOK ON YOUR PC, iPHONE OR KINDLE DEVICE
Debating the Holocaust: A New Look at Both Sides By Thomas Dalton
In this remarkable, balanced book, the author skillfully reviews and compares "traditional" and "revisionist" views on the "The Holocaust."
On one side is the traditional, orthodox view -- six million Jewish casualties, gas chambers, cremation ovens, mass graves, and thousands of witnesses. On the other is the view of a small band of skeptical writers and researchers, often unfairly labeled "deniers," who contend that the public has been gravely misled about this emotion-laden chapter of history.
The author establishes that the arguments and findings of revisionist scholars are substantive, and deserve serious consideration. He points out, for example, that even the eminent Jewish Holocaust scholar Raul Hilberg acknowledged that there was no budget, plan or order by Hitler for a World War II program to exterminate Europe's Jews.
This book is especially relevant right now, as "Holocaust deniers" are routinely and harshly punished for their "blasphemy," and as growing numbers of people regard the standard, Hollywoodized "Holocaust" narrative with mounting suspicion and distrust.
The author of this book, who writes under the pen name of "Thomas Dalton," is an American scholar who holds a doctoral degree from a major US university.
This is no peripheral debate between arcane views of some obscure aspect of twentieth century history. Instead, this is a clash with profound social-political implications regarding freedom of speech and press, the manipulation of public opinion, how our cultural life is shaped, and how power is wielded in our society.
http://www.amazon.
Peace.
Michael Santomauro
Editorial Director
Call anytime: 917-974-6367
ReporterNotebook@
__._,_.___
MARKETPLACE
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment