Translate

Jan 24, 2010

ADL: Limbaugh’s ‘borderline anti-Semitic’ comments ‘a new low’

 

ADL: Limbaugh's 'borderline anti-Semitic' comments 'a new low'





By Daniel Tencer
Thursday, January 21st, 2010 -- 5:00 pm

rushlimbaugh20080702 ADL: Limbaughs borderline anti Semitic comments a new lowThe head of one of the world's most prominent Jewish advocacy groups has accused Rush Limbaugh of making "borderline anti-Semitic comments" by linking Jews to banking.

Discussing the Massachusetts Senate race and President Obama's proposed financial reforms on the Rush Limbaugh ShowWednesday, the controversial commentator said:

To some people, "banker" is code word for Jewish; and guess who Obama is assaulting? He's assaulting bankers. He's assaulting money people. And a lot of those people on Wall Street are Jewish. So I wonder if there's starting to be some buyer's remorse there?

Limbaugh's invocation of an old stereotype about Jews and their role in banking got the attention of Abraham Foxman, the national director of the Anti-Defamation League.

"Rush Limbaugh reached a new low with his borderline anti-Semitic comments about Jews as bankers, their supposed influence on Wall Street, and how they vote," Foxman said in a statement emailed to media on Thursday. Foxman said:

Limbaugh's references to Jews and money in a discussion of Massachusetts politics were offensive and inappropriate. While the age-old stereotype about Jews and money has a long and sordid history, it also remains one of the main pillars of anti-Semitism and is widely accepted by many Americans. His notion that Jews vote based on their religion, rather than on their interests as Americans, plays into the hands of anti-Semitic conspiracy theorists.

Foxman added that "Limbaugh should apologize."

Limbaugh "is on uniquely dangerous grounds here," writes M.J. Rosenberg at TalkingPointsMemo. "The 'Jews = Bankers' meme is not that common in this country. It is European, and was put to its most deadly use by Hitler."

Last year, Limbaugh raised eyebrows when he criticized President Obama for bringing up the Holocaust during a visit to Germany. Limbaugh argued that Obama shouldn't be criticizing Germany "for what it did 60 or 65 years ago." That was interpreted by some as demeaning the significance of the Holocaust.

During the 2008 presidential campaign, Limbaugh drew the attention of the Jewish community when he said that Jewish Americans' overwhelming support for Obama was the result of "white guilt," among other things.

The following audio was broadcast on The Rush Limbaugh Show, Wednesday January 20, 2010, and uploaded to the Web by MediaMatters.



--
NOW AN AMAZON KINDLE BOOK ON YOUR PC, iPHONE OR KINDLE DEVICE

Debating the Holocaust: A New Look at Both Sides By Thomas Dalton

In this remarkable, balanced book, the author skillfully reviews and compares "traditional" and "revisionist" views on the "The Holocaust."

On one side is the traditional, orthodox view -- six million Jewish casualties, gas chambers, cremation ovens, mass graves, and thousands of witnesses. On the other is the view of a small band of skeptical writers and researchers, often unfairly labeled "deniers," who contend that the public has been gravely misled about this emotion-laden chapter of history.

The author establishes that the arguments and findings of revisionist scholars are substantive, and deserve serious consideration. He points out, for example, that even the eminent Jewish Holocaust scholar Raul Hilberg acknowledged that there was no budget, plan or order by Hitler for a World War II program to exterminate Europe's Jews.

This book is especially relevant right now, as "Holocaust deniers" are routinely and harshly punished for their "blasphemy," and as growing numbers of people regard the standard, Hollywoodized "Holocaust" narrative with mounting suspicion and distrust.

The author of this book, who writes under the pen name of "Thomas Dalton," is an American scholar who holds a doctoral degree from a major US university.

This is no peripheral debate between arcane views of some obscure aspect of twentieth century history. Instead, this is a clash with profound social-political implications regarding freedom of speech and press, the manipulation of public opinion, how our cultural life is shaped, and how power is wielded in our society.

http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_0_8?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=debating+the+holocaust&sprefix=DEBATING

Peace.

Michael Santomauro
Editorial Director
Call anytime: 917-974-6367
ReporterNotebook@Gmail.com

__._,_.___
.

__,_._,___

No comments: