Translate

Jan 9, 2010

He meant no harm...

 


From: Manuel Sotil <msotil@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 7:32 PM

Subject: He meant no harm...


This doctoral candidate in molecular biology has been living in the US since 2004 but he is completely unaware of TSA security regulations and restrictions for air travel. He chose to "beat" the system by ducking under the ropes and gaining access to an area where he was not supposed to be the moment the guard who had told him to step back, bat an eyelash. He may be either hopelessly stupid or a potential criminal, but undeniable he is out to beat the system.

 Shortly after the new security regulations that afflict every air traveler were implemented, another chinaman, a chef, tried to board a flight carrying a set of chef knives in his hand bag. I am sure, he also meant no harm. No one enjoys the inconvenience that such regulations impose on air travelers, but we all understand the need to observe laws and regulations, and the reason such laws and regulations were implemented. Not so doctoral candidate Haisong Jiang.

 I would have no problem believing that this kind of breech of the public order is not rare in China. This incident illustrates the difficult task of re-educating people from non-western cultures to abide by something called „rules", which native people must observe. 

 Having inconvenienced thousands of people and having cost possibly millions of dollars in expenses, wasted fuel, wasted hours, overtime, missed connections, missed flights, and undoubtedly great hardship to some, doctoral candidate Haisong Jiang is treated like a toddler and may be given a fine of "up to" $500. In China, his own country, he may have been shot.

 http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_newark_airport_evacuation

 

Manuel Sotil

 




--
NOW AN AMAZON KINDLE BOOK ON YOUR PC, iPHONE OR KINDLE DEVICE

Debating the Holocaust: A New Look at Both Sides By Thomas Dalton

In this remarkable, balanced book, the author skillfully reviews and compares "traditional" and "revisionist" views on the "The Holocaust."

On one side is the traditional, orthodox view -- six million Jewish casualties, gas chambers, cremation ovens, mass graves, and thousands of witnesses. On the other is the view of a small band of skeptical writers and researchers, often unfairly labeled "deniers," who contend that the public has been gravely misled about this emotion-laden chapter of history.

The author establishes that the arguments and findings of revisionist scholars are substantive, and deserve serious consideration. He points out, for example, that even the eminent Jewish Holocaust scholar Raul Hilberg acknowledged that there was no budget, plan or order by Hitler for a World War II program to exterminate Europe's Jews.

This book is especially relevant right now, as "Holocaust deniers" are routinely and harshly punished for their "blasphemy," and as growing numbers of people regard the standard, Hollywoodized "Holocaust" narrative with mounting suspicion and distrust.

The author of this book, who writes under the pen name of "Thomas Dalton," is an American scholar who holds a doctoral degree from a major US university.

This is no peripheral debate between arcane views of some obscure aspect of twentieth century history. Instead, this is a clash with profound social-political implications regarding freedom of speech and press, the manipulation of public opinion, how our cultural life is shaped, and how power is wielded in our society.

http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_0_8?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=debating+the+holocaust&sprefix=DEBATING

Peace.

Michael Santomauro
Editorial Director
Call anytime: 917-974-6367
ReporterNotebook@Gmail.com

__._,_.___
.

__,_._,___

No comments: