To the Editor:
Professor Deborah E. Lipstadt's insightful essay, "Genocide's Toxic Legacy" (The Chronicle Review, February 18), excerpted from her new book The Eichmann Trial (Schocken Books), pinpoints the central evil of the 20th century, namely, abolitionist anti-Semitism, which is spilling over into the rhetoric of the 21st century. Even after the Holocaust, that anti-Semitism persists stubbornly. Lipstadt rightfully makes the case that the Nazi brand of Jew hatred remains an integral, malignant part of contemporary thought.
Her focus is exclusively on denial of the Holocaust. She omits mentioning the denial of non-Holocaust genocides. One instance is the bitter debate over the status of the Armenian calamity. Academics and politicians are still struggling over the proper term—genocide or massacre. Depending on whom one consults, the issue is by no means resolved.
Another example is the classification of the victimization of the Roma (Gypsies) by the Nazis. What was unseemly about this debate was that the deniers wanted to preserve the "uniqueness" of the Holocaust. Some of those deniers are not far from upholding anti-Semitic tendencies. They need to be exposed.
Henry R. Huttenbach
Founder
Journal of Genocide Research
New York
--
"...when you have laws against questioning the Holocaust narrative, you are screaming at the other person to stop thinking!!!" ---Michael Santomauro, March 23, 2011
Being happy–is it good for the Jews? "Before Professor Dershowitz accused me of being an anti-Semite (news to me), I was a happy person. Since then, I'm still a happy person". –Michael Santomauro
No comments:
Post a Comment