Translate

Nov 15, 2010

Re;Re;Re: Another Jew bites the dust...Your professor of LITERATURE (Faurisson) is ...

 

From: fred1 <fred1@>
Date: Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:46 AM
Subject: Re: Another Jew bites the dust...Your professor of LITERATURE (Faurisson) is ...
To: ReportersNotebook-owner@yahoogroups.com



To Prof. Weinblatt:

You question Faurisson's credibility in History.  I question yours in Execution Engineering.   You know much less about execution procedures than Faurisson does about History.   If you live in a glass house remember about the stones.

Fred Leuchter
Expert on Execution Technology


In a message dated 11/13/2010 5:19:14 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, csw2@bex.net writes:

FROM: Prof. Charles Weinblatt:


Your professor of LITERATURE (Faurisson) is respected by no one in HISTORY.  When will you get it?  You might as well ask a professor of English for an opinion about Engineering!  Get a life.  The Holocaust happened.  A LITERATURE professor making statements about HISTORY is not authentic.  Virtually every professor of History agrees that millions of innocent Jews were murdered.  Virtually no one besides virulent anti-Semites believe in Holocaust denial or historical revision of the Shoah. 

 

Joe, you are unable to proffer anything close to academic reality or Holocaust veracity.  You believe in snake oil salesmen; people beyond their own area of expertise who pretend to know more than PhDs in History. 

 

Since virtually every professional historian agrees that millions of innocent Jews were murdered by Nazi Germany, the only valid question is why someone (like you) would wish to deny that which has been proven empirically literally thousands of times.  Either you love Nazis and/or you hate Jews.  After all, the Holocaust is not conjecture, but fact, proven time and time again with empirical means. Nazi leaders themselves admitted to murdering millions of innocent Jews (see Nuremberg Trial transcripts). 

 

So, which is it Joe?  Do you love Nazis?  Do you hate Jews?  Or is it both?

 

Finally, please know that this is the last time I will respond to your e-mail messages.  I will debate those who comprehend and validate empirical data.  You provide bizarre conjecture, not valid data.  You use people who spout crap out of their area of expertise, not professional historians who have carefully researched the Holocaust.  Joe, if you want to know what I'm talking about, then please research web sites associated with esteemed institutions of higher education.  The truth lies within those Ivy-covered walls, not among Internet web sites devoted to denial. 

 

Goodbye.

Prof. Charles Weinblatt


 

From: JoRiz@aol.com [mailto:JoRiz@aol.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2010 1:52 AM
To: csw2@bex.net
Subject: Check out ROBERT FAURISSON: A look back at my discovery, on March 19, 1976, o

 

 I think its about time you start seeing the FACTS about the gas chambers.

 

Joe Rizoli

 

 

 

 



__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___
Posted by at No comments:

Re:re: Another Jew bites the dust...Your professor of LITERATURE (Faurisson) is ...

 

From: <jack.martin1@juno.com>
Date: Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:02 PM
Subject: Re: Another Jew bites the dust...Your professor of LITERATURE (Faurisson) is ...
To: ReportersNotebook-owner@yahoogroups.com
Cc: Gpduf@aol.com



Prof. C. Weinblatt says, "When will you get it?  ....A LITERATURE professor making statements about HISTORY is not authentic....."  
Who decides what's authentic... Mr. Weinblatt... a writer of  "Holocaust" romance tales???.
 
Albert Einstein famously said: "The foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
 
But, alas for poor Prof. Weinblatt, that's all he has to support his position.
And to make matters worse for him, a good many of the "historians" he would rely on are not accredited historians themselves.  Gerald Reitlinger was an artist and art collector; Raoul Hilberg was a professor of "political science", Nora Levin was a research librarian when she wrote her book; Poliakov was the director of the World Center of Contemporary Jewish Documentation in Paris; Davidowicz, director of a chair in "Holocaust studies."  All of these are Jewish... with a Jewish axe to grind.  They presume to be like the Pope....  Infallible....
 
Since Weinblatt has no concrete evidence for his case he relies on the pontifications of the "approved" authorities....; and he and his ilk gets to decide who is "approved."
In effect he is attempting to transform history into a religion and make the "Holocaust" a matter of doctrine.  What's next? a Holy Inquisition?
 
Edward L. Bernays, Jewish, and nephew of Sigmund Freud, 1891-1995 wrote in his book "Propaganda", p. 71 as follows:
"If we understand the mechanism and motives of the group mind, is it not possible to control and regiment the masses according to our will without their knowing about it? 

...The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society.  Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power  of our government. 
We are governed, our minds molded, our tastes formed, or ideals suggested, largely by men we have never heard of."
 
"Oh, what a tangled web they weave when first they practice to deceive....."
"But once they practised quite a while, how vastly they improved their style"
 
Mossad Motto:  "By way of deception thou shalt make war"
 
Another relative of Sigmund Freud and Edward L. Bernays, Murray C. Bernays, was heavily involved with "war crimes" problems.... and  key member of Jackson's London staff ...

"He was given a commission in the Army in 1942, and in October 1943 was made chief of the Special Projects Branch, Personnel Division Army General Staff.  His major project in this position was the preparation of plans for trials of German "war criminals".  After each stage of negotiations with the White House and others he made the appropriate revisions in the plans being considered although, if one is to credit his account, he was the author of the plan that was eventually settled on.  In any case, shortly after the appointment of Jackson, Bernays was awarded the Legion of Merit, the citation reading in part:

"Early recognizing the need for a sound  basis in dealing with the problem of war criminals and war crimes, he formulated the basic concept of such a policy and initiated timely and appropriate action which assured its adoption as the foundation of national policy."
 
....He had certainly been an appropriate choice for something as novel as the formulation of the "legal" structure for the war crimes trials, since his views of justice were equally novel.  After his return to the U.S. he had a chat with some editors (who characterized  him as "the man behind the gavel"), and in answer to their queries as to "how the small fry are going to be hooked, he replied:   "...But if we establish that the SS, for example, was a criminal organization and that membership in it is evidence PER SE of criminality the Allies are going to get hold of a great many more criminals in one swoop."  You know, a lot of people here at home don't realize that WE ARE NOW the government of Germany in our zone and that no judicial system can exist other that one WE approve.  We ARE the law... "
See: A.R. Butz, "The Hoax of the Twentieth Century", p. 21 (1977 ed.)
 
Rabbi Meir Kahane in his foreword to Menachem Begin's Biography "The Revolt", second edition wrote:

"...It is terribly difficult to ascertain historical truth because history is at the mercy of the writer.
History is in the eyes of the beholder and his vision is all too often obscured by personal motives, political and economic considerations and intellectual bias.

Worse, it is the victor who dictates the facts after a war.  The political faction that emerges powerful informs the curious about the events of the struggle.

Those who have the wealth and the power can afford to be fools or knaves.  They have the means to bury their mistakes and rewrite history in their own image.

That which history books tell us the way things happened is not always so:  Truth must be sought with diligence and with respectful mistrust of the powers who insist that we believe their version....
 
Again:  Truth must be sought with diligence and with RESPECTFUL MISTRUST of the powers who INSIST that we believe their version.... 
As Albert Einstein famously said: "The foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
 
 
 
 
 
 


__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___
Posted by at No comments:

Taibbi: the Tea Party Moron Complex By Matt Taibbi

 


 

 

 

AlterNet

Taibbi: the Tea Party Moron Complex

By Matt Taibbi, Random House Publishing Group
Posted on November 14, 2010, Printed on November 15, 2010
http://www.alternet.org/story/148855/

The following is an excerpt from Matt Taibbi's new book, "Griftopia: Bubble Machines, Vampire Squids, and the Long Con That Is Breaking America." published by Random House, 2010.

If American politics made any sense at all, we wouldn't have two giant political parties of roughly equal size perpetually fighting over the same 5–10 percent swatch of undecided voters, blues versus reds. Instead, the parties should be broken down into haves and have-nots -- a couple of obnoxious bankers on the Upper East Side running for office against 280 million pissed-off credit card and mortgage customers. That's the more accurate demographic picture of a country in which the top 1 percent has seen its share of the nation's overall wealth jump from 34.6 percent before the crisis, in 2007, to over 37.1 percent in 2009.   Moreover, the standard of living for the  average American has plummeted during the crisis -- the median American household net worth was $102,500 in 2007, and went down to $65,400 in 2009 -- while the top 1 percent saw its net worth hold relatively steady, dropping from $19.5 million to $16.5 million.

But we'll never see our political parties sensibly aligned according to these obvious economic divisions, mainly because it's so pathetically easy in the TV age to set big groups of voters off angrily chasing their own tails in response to media-manufactured nonsense, with the Tea Party being a classic example of the phenomenon. If you want to understand why America is such a paradise for high-class thieves, just look at the way a manufactured movement like the Tea Party corrals and neutralizes public anger that otherwise should be sending pitchforks in the direction of downtown Manhattan.

There are two reasons why Tea Party voters will probably never get wise to the Ponzi-scheme reality of bubble economics. One has to do with the basic sales pitch of Tea Party rhetoric, which cleverly exploits Main Street frustrations over genuinely intrusive state and local governments that are constantly in the pockets of small businesses for fees and fines and permits.

The other reason is obvious: the bubble economy is hard as hell to understand. To even have a chance at grasping how it works, you need to commit large chunks of time to learning about things like securitization, credit default swaps, collateralized debt obligations, etc., stuff that's fiendishly complicated and that if ingested too quickly can feature a truly toxic boredom factor.

So long as this stuff is not widely understood by the public, the Grifter class is going to skate on almost anything it does -- because the tendency of most voters, in particular conservative voters, is to assume that Wall Street makes its money engaging in normal capitalist business and that any attempt to restrain that sector of the economy is thinly disguised socialism.

That's why it's so brilliant for the Tea Party to put forward as its leaders some of the most egregiously stupid morons on our great green earth. By rallying behind dingbats like Palin and Michele Bachmann -- the Minnesota congresswoman who thought the movie Aladdin promoted witchcraft and insisted global warming wasn't a threat because "carbon dioxide is natural" -- the Tea Party has made anti-intellectualism itself a rallying cry. The Tea Party is arguing against the very idea that it's even necessary to ask the kinds of questions you need to ask to grasp bubble economics.

Bachmann is the perfect symbol of the Dumb and Dumber approach to high finance. She makes a great show of saying things that would get a kindergartner busted to the special ed bus -- shrieking, for instance, that AmeriCorps was a plot to force children into liberal "reeducation camps" (Bachmann's own son, incidentally, was a teacher in an AmeriCorps program), or claiming that the U.S. economy was "100 percent private" before Barack Obama's election (she would later say Obama in his first year and a half managed to seize control of "51 percent of the American economy").

When the Chinese proposed replacing the dollar as the international reserve currency, Bachmann apparently thought this meant that the dollar itself was going to be replaced, that Americans would be shelling out yuan to buy six-packs of Sprite in the local 7-Eleven. So to combat this dire threat she sponsored a bill that would "bar the dollar from being  replaced by any foreign currency." When reporters like me besieged Bachmann's office with calls to ask if the congresswoman, a former tax attorney, understood the difference between currency and reserve currency, and to ask generally what the hell she was talking about, her spokeswoman, Debbee Keller, was forced to issue a statement clarifying that "she's talking about the United States . . . The legislation would ensure that the dollar would remain the currency of the United States."  

A Democratic staffer I know in the House called me up after he caught wind of Bachmann's currency bill. "We get a lot of yokels in here, small-town lawyers who've never been east of Indiana and so on, but Michele Bachmann . . . We've just never seen anything quite like her before."

Bachmann has a lot of critics, but they miss the genius of her political act. Even as she spends every day publicly flubbing political SAT questions, she's always dead-on when it comes to her basic message, which is that government is always the problem and there are no issues the country has that can't be worked out with basic common sense (there's a reason why many Tea Party groups are called "Common Sense Patriots" and rally behind "common sense campaigns").

Common sense sounds great, but if you're too freaking lazy to penetrate the mysteries of carbon dioxide -- if you haven't mastered the whole concept of breathing by the time you're old enough to serve in the U.S. Congress -- you're not going to get the credit default swap, the synthetic collateralized debt obligation, the interest rate swap, etc. And understanding these instruments and how they were used (or misused) is the difference between perceiving how Wall Street made its money in the last decades as normal capitalist business and seeing the truth of what it often was instead, which was simple fraud and crime. It's not an accident that Bachmann emerged in the summer of 2010 (right as she was forming the House of Tea Party Caucus) as one of the fiercest opponents of financial regulatory reform; her primary complaint with the deeply flawed reform bill sponsored by Senator Chris Dodd and Congressman Barney Frank was that it would "end free checking accounts."

Our world isn't about ideology anymore. It's about complexity. We live in a complex bureaucratic state with complex laws and complex business practices, and the few organizations with the corporate will power to master these complexities will inevitably own the political power. On the other hand, movements like the Tea Party more than anything else reflect a widespread longing for simpler times and simple solutions -- just throw the U.S. Constitution at the whole mess and everything will be jake. For immigration, build a big fence. Abolish the Federal Reserve, the Department of Commerce, the Department of Education. At times the overt longing for simple answers that you get from Tea Party leaders is so earnest and touching, it almost makes you forget how insane most of them are.

This excerpt first appeared on DailyKos. Click here for a copy of "Griftopia: Bubble Machines, Vampire Squids, and the Long Con That Is Breaking America."

Matt Taibbi is a writer for Rolling Stone.

© 2010 Random House Publishing Group All rights reserved.
View this story online at: http://www.alternet.org/story/148855/

 

 

 

[Ilene Proctor]

[Ilene Proctor]




--

Being happy–is it good for the Jews? "Before Professor Dershowitz accused me of being an anti-Semite (news to me), I was a happy person. Since then, I'm still a happy person". –Michael Santomauro

An antisemite condemns people for being Jews, I am not an antisemite.--Michael Santomauro

Most of us are mentally trapped to think Jewish. Actually, it is safe to say that virtually every mainstream publication or or other type of media organ is "nothing more than a screen to present chosen views." The great battle over the last century has been a battle for the mind of the Western peoples, i.e., non-Jewish Euros. The chosen won it by acquiring control over essentially the complete mainstream news, information, education and entertainment media of every type, and using that control to infuse and disseminate their message, agenda and worldview, their way of thinking, or rather the way they want us to think. Since at least the 1960s this campaign has been effectively complete. Since then they have shaped and controlled the minds of all but a seeming few of us in varying degree with almost no opposition or competition from any alternative worldview. So now most of us are mentally trapped in the box the chosen have made for us, which we have lived in all our lives. Only a few have managed to avoid it or escape it, or to even sometimes see outside of it, and so actually "think outside of the (Jewish) box." --Michael Santomauro

Thank you and remember: 

Peace is patriotic!

Michael Santomauro
253 W. 72nd Street
New York, NY 10023

Call anytime: 917-974-6367

E-mail me anything:
ReporterNotebook@Gmail.com

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.

Find useful articles and helpful tips on living with Fibromyalgia. Visit the Fibromyalgia Zone today!

Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.

.

__,_._,___
Posted by at No comments:

Prof. Kevin MacDonald: Glenn Beck on George Soros PLUS blog: Soros Courts the Neocons

 


__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.

Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.

Find useful articles and helpful tips on living with Fibromyalgia. Visit the Fibromyalgia Zone today!

.

__,_._,___
Posted by at No comments:

Super Sampler ...

 


__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
MARKETPLACE

Find useful articles and helpful tips on living with Fibromyalgia. Visit the Fibromyalgia Zone today!

Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.

.

__,_._,___
Posted by at No comments:

Re: Another Jew bites the dust...Your professor of LITERATURE (Faurisson) is ...

 


From: <Gpduf@aol.com>
Date: Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:10 AM
Subject: Re: Another Jew bites the dust...Your professor of LITERATURE (Faurisson) is ...
To: ReportersNotebook-owner@yahoogroups.com, RePortersNoteBook@yahoogroups.com
Cc: joriz@aol.com, ccfile@gmail.com


 
It is possible to discuss the holocaust from a perspective other than outright denial or digging into the garbage heap to bring up accusations of Nazism or Antisemitism.
 
The same "professors," all answerable for their complicity in promoting the holocaust as part of an aggressive agenda to justify war crimes by Israel are also forced to find Zionists, Irgun/Stern in particular, who were allied to Hitler through the entire war.  The documentation here is overwhelming.
 
History has a bad "history" in this area.
 
Before anyone begins speaking for real holocaust survivors, we need to define them, clean out the huge number of phonies and ask them.
 
Then we need to ask the other groups who suffered similar brutality during the same period.  Those "legitimate" historians have been covering for Stalin for decades, not just Katyn, but the murder of millions of German civilians as well. 
 
Stalin also murdered 12 million Russians, minimum, maybe 5 times that many.
 
People really suffered at the hands of the Germans.  That can't be denied and I believe stressing technicalities about how many or gas chambers or not isn't helping.  The belief today by many is that, since Israel is only using guns, napalm, WP, and a variety of radioactive weaponry, not just DU, and not gas chambers, they are less brutal than the Nazis.
 
I have spoken with REAL holocaust survivors, Jews, who don't support this genocide or any other.  Their voice has been drowned out by the million phonies.  Why do we need to honestly examine the problem?
 
Why?
 
....so we can really say "never again" and mean it.  Stop the games.
 
Gordon Duff
Senior Editor
 
 
 
In a message dated 11/15/2010 2:52:30 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, RePorterNoteBook@Gmail.com writes:
 


From: <JoRiz@aol.com>
Date: Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 1:49 AM
Subject: Another Jew bites the dust.....
To: ccfiile@gmail.com


They just can't take the heat....
 
Joe Rizoli
CCFIILE.com
 
In a message dated 11/13/2010 5:19:14 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, csw2@bex.net writes:

FROM: Prof. Charles Weinblatt:


Your professor of LITERATURE (Faurisson) is respected by no one in HISTORY.  When will you get it?  You might as well ask a professor of English for an opinion about Engineering!  Get a life.  The Holocaust happened.  A LITERATURE professor making statements about HISTORY is not authentic.  Virtually every professor of History agrees that millions of innocent Jews were murdered.  Virtually no one besides virulent anti-Semites believe in Holocaust denial or historical revision of the Shoah. 

 

Joe, you are unable to proffer anything close to academic reality or Holocaust veracity.  You believe in snake oil salesmen; people beyond their own area of expertise who pretend to know more than PhDs in History. 

 

Since virtually every professional historian agrees that millions of innocent Jews were murdered by Nazi Germany, the only valid question is why someone (like you) would wish to deny that which has been proven empirically literally thousands of times.  Either you love Nazis and/or you hate Jews.  After all, the Holocaust is not conjecture, but fact, proven time and time again with empirical means. Nazi leaders themselves admitted to murdering millions of innocent Jews (see Nuremberg Trial transcripts). 

 

So, which is it Joe?  Do you love Nazis?  Do you hate Jews?  Or is it both?

 

Finally, please know that this is the last time I will respond to your e-mail messages.  I will debate those who comprehend and validate empirical data.  You provide bizarre conjecture, not valid data.  You use people who spout crap out of their area of expertise, not professional historians who have carefully researched the Holocaust.  Joe, if you want to know what I'm talking about, then please research web sites associated with esteemed institutions of higher education.  The truth lies within those Ivy-covered walls, not among Internet web sites devoted to denial. 

 

Goodbye.

Prof. Charles Weinblatt


 

From: JoRiz@aol.com [mailto:JoRiz@aol.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2010 1:52 AM
To: csw2@bex.net
Subject: Check out ROBERT FAURISSON: A look back at my discovery, on March 19, 1976, o

 

 I think its about time you start seeing the FACTS about the gas chambers.

 

Joe Rizoli

 

 

 

 




__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___
Posted by at No comments:

GERALDO says "more open-minded" -- possible that the OFFICIAL conspiracy theory is a lie..

 

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Shelby Tucker <shelby@amonginsurgents.com>
Date: Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 5:51 AM
Subject: The clearest evidence possible that the OFFICIAL conspiracy theory is a lie

Most of you know, or should know by now that THREE buildings collapsed into their own footprints on 9/11, the two Towers and Building 7, which was not struck by an airplane. The government's Nine Eleven Commission concluded that fire from the Towers caused Building 7 to collapse. Now look at this video, noting inter alia what the owner of the three buildings, Larry Silverstein, stated on television in the first minute of the video. 'They were not sure that they would be able to contain the fire. And I said, you know, we've had such terrible loss of life I think the smartest thing to do is to pull it. And they made that decision to pull. Then we watched the building collapse.'


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ckAUODUEJSk&feature=player_embedded











__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___
Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)