Published: December 17, 2009 09:42 pm Climategate a fraud and came as no surprise to some people Recently released e-mails reveal that a group of influential climate scientists manipulated data, stifled objective reviews of their work and flat out lied about man made global warming. It's called Climategate and the Obama media's silence on it is deafening.
This was no surprise to many of us who have watched this religion of global warming close factories, and raise the cost of heating homes and driving cars. These scientists claim that consensus trumps fact. Real science works when a theory is tested and verified against real results, something these fellows have never produced.
I wish consensus science really worked. We could solve our energy problems tomorrow. Just have a consensus that water boils at 50 degrees and there will be plenty of energy. Never mind that lakes would boil away if that were true. That's logical and like manmade global warming, we won't let reason get in the way of faith.
Many say that science that is contrary to the global warming religion is deceptive because it comes from people that have gotten funding from oil companies. Look, if I had to convince you that water boils at 212 degrees all I have to do is to demonstrate that, not call you a name and say that you got a check from Exxon.
And as far as funding, who is more suspect? Is it a scientist that receives a small grant from Shell Oil, among many others grants from many other types of companies? Or a 'scientist' whose entire living, first class seats for vacations, BMW's complete with Obama stickers, and huge McMansion, comes from institutions whose only mission is to prove that manmade global warming is true?
Billions of your dollars have gone to the Church of Climate Science. A two year old freedom of information request against NASA demanding they release their so called temperature data has yet to be complied with. Rocket scientists are proving one thing: It takes two years to really cook the books.
Hey, Congress, instead of stealing money from Medicare and the elderly investigate and stop this massive fraud on the taxpayers.
Carlisle, Pa., former resident
NOW AN AMAZON KINDLE BOOK ON YOUR PC, iPHONE OR KINDLE DEVICE
Debating the Holocaust: A New Look at Both Sides By Thomas Dalton
In this remarkable, balanced book, the author skillfully reviews and compares "traditional" and "revisionist" views on the "The Holocaust."
On one side is the traditional, orthodox view -- six million Jewish casualties, gas chambers, cremation ovens, mass graves, and thousands of witnesses. On the other is the view of a small band of skeptical writers and researchers, often unfairly labeled "deniers," who contend that the public has been gravely misled about this emotion-laden chapter of history.
The author establishes that the arguments and findings of revisionist scholars are substantive, and deserve serious consideration. He points out, for example, that even the eminent Jewish Holocaust scholar Raul Hilberg acknowledged that there was no budget, plan or order by Hitler for a World War II program to exterminate Europe's Jews.
This book is especially relevant right now, as "Holocaust deniers" are routinely and harshly punished for their "blasphemy," and as growing numbers of people regard the standard, Hollywoodized "Holocaust" narrative with mounting suspicion and distrust.
The author of this book, who writes under the pen name of "Thomas Dalton," is an American scholar who holds a doctoral degree from a major US university.
This is no peripheral debate between arcane views of some obscure aspect of twentieth century history. Instead, this is a clash with profound social-political implications regarding freedom of speech and press, the manipulation of public opinion, how our cultural life is shaped, and how power is wielded in our society.
Call anytime: 917-974-6367
Published: December 17, 2009 09:42 pm
Climategate a fraud and came as no surprise to some peopleTo the Editor:
Recently released e-mails reveal that a group of influential climate scientists manipulated data, stifled objective reviews of their work and flat out lied about man made global warming. It's called Climategate and the Obama media's silence on it is deafening.