From: <GiuseppeFurioso@aol.com>
Date: Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 9:12 PM
To: ReportersNotebook-owner@yahoogroups.com, jacobandesau@yahoogroups.com
Someone should tell this asshole that Jan van Pelt who testified for Lipstadt in the Irving trial trained as an architect ( although he had no formal degree which prompted Irving to call him a pseudo architect ), Raul Hilburg's degree is in Political Science and so is Goldenhagen's, Berenbaum the former director of the Holocaust Museum has his degree in theology. And then there is Elie Wiesel who has no degree except honorary ones that are abso;utely meaningless from a scholarly point of view. You should also ask this moron to cite a single world renowned historian of Holocaust who is not a Jew...the only one I can think of is Christopher Brownings. The big names of World War ll scholarship, the Keegans, the Taylors, the Trevor Ropers, the Bullocks, The Baldwins, The Charmleys are conspicuously absent for this area...how come. And lets not forget what Churchill, Eisenhower, De Gaulle had to say about the big '' H'' in their memoirs...not a single sentence. joe
-----Original Message-----
From: ReporterNotebook <RePorterNoteBook@Gmail.com>
To: reportersnotebook <RePortersNoteBook@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Mon, Nov 15, 2010 8:24 pm
Subject: Re:re: Another Jew bites the dust...Your professor of LITERATURE (Faurisson) is ...
From: ReporterNotebook <RePorterNoteBook@Gmail.com>
To: reportersnotebook <RePortersNoteBook@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Mon, Nov 15, 2010 8:24 pm
Subject: Re:re: Another Jew bites the dust...Your professor of LITERATURE (Faurisson) is ...
From: <jack.martin1@juno.com>
Date: Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:02 PM
Subject: Re: Another Jew bites the dust...Your professor of LITERATURE (Faurisson) is ...
To: ReportersNotebook-owner@yahoogroups.com
Cc: Gpduf@aol.com
Prof. C. Weinblatt says, "When will you get it? ....A LITERATURE professor making statements about HISTORY is not authentic....."
Who decides what's authentic... Mr. Weinblatt... a writer of "Holocaust" romance tales???.
Date: Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:02 PM
Subject: Re: Another Jew bites the dust...Your professor of LITERATURE (Faurisson) is ...
To: ReportersNotebook-owner@yahoogroups.com
Cc: Gpduf@aol.com
Prof. C. Weinblatt says, "When will you get it? ....A LITERATURE professor making statements about HISTORY is not authentic....."
Who decides what's authentic... Mr. Weinblatt... a writer of "Holocaust" romance tales???.
Albert Einstein famously said: "The foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
But, alas for poor Prof. Weinblatt, that's all he has to support his position.
And to make matters worse for him, a good many of the "historians" he would rely on are not accredited historians themselves. Gerald Reitlinger was an artist and art collector; Raoul Hilberg was a professor of "political science", Nora Levin was a research librarian when she wrote her book; Poliakov was the director of the World Center of Contemporary Jewish Documentation in Paris; Davidowicz, director of a chair in "Holocaust studies." All of these are Jewish... with a Jewish axe to grind. They presume to be like the Pope.... Infallible....
And to make matters worse for him, a good many of the "historians" he would rely on are not accredited historians themselves. Gerald Reitlinger was an artist and art collector; Raoul Hilberg was a professor of "political science", Nora Levin was a research librarian when she wrote her book; Poliakov was the director of the World Center of Contemporary Jewish Documentation in Paris; Davidowicz, director of a chair in "Holocaust studies." All of these are Jewish... with a Jewish axe to grind. They presume to be like the Pope.... Infallible....
Since Weinblatt has no concrete evidence for his case he relies on the pontifications of the "approved" authorities....; and he and his ilk gets to decide who is "approved."
In effect he is attempting to transform history into a religion and make the "Holocaust" a matter of doctrine. What's next? a Holy Inquisition?
In effect he is attempting to transform history into a religion and make the "Holocaust" a matter of doctrine. What's next? a Holy Inquisition?
Edward L. Bernays, Jewish, and nephew of Sigmund Freud, 1891-1995 wrote in his book "Propaganda", p. 71 as follows:
"If we understand the mechanism and motives of the group mind, is it not possible to control and regiment the masses according to our will without their knowing about it?
"If we understand the mechanism and motives of the group mind, is it not possible to control and regiment the masses according to our will without their knowing about it?
...The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our government.
We are governed, our minds molded, our tastes formed, or ideals suggested, largely by men we have never heard of."
We are governed, our minds molded, our tastes formed, or ideals suggested, largely by men we have never heard of."
"Oh, what a tangled web they weave when first they practice to deceive....."
"But once they practised quite a while, how vastly they improved their style"
"But once they practised quite a while, how vastly they improved their style"
Mossad Motto: "By way of deception thou shalt make war"
Another relative of Sigmund Freud and Edward L. Bernays, Murray C. Bernays, was heavily involved with "war crimes" problems.... and key member of Jackson's London staff ...
"He was given a commission in the Army in 1942, and in October 1943 was made chief of the Special Projects Branch, Personnel Division Army General Staff. His major project in this position was the preparation of plans for trials of German "war criminals". After each stage of negotiations with the White House and others he made the appropriate revisions in the plans being considered although, if one is to credit his account, he was the author of the plan that was eventually settled on. In any case, shortly after the appointment of Jackson, Bernays was awarded the Legion of Merit, the citation reading in part:
"Early recognizing the need for a sound basis in dealing with the problem of war criminals and war crimes, he formulated the basic concept of such a policy and initiated timely and appropriate action which assured its adoption as the foundation of national policy."
....He had certainly been an appropriate choice for something as novel as the formulation of the "legal" structure for the war crimes trials, since his views of justice were equally novel. After his return to the U.S. he had a chat with some editors (who characterized him as "the man behind the gavel"), and in answer to their queries as to "how the small fry are going to be hooked, he replied: "...But if we establish that the SS, for example, was a criminal organization and that membership in it is evidence PER SE of criminality the Allies are going to get hold of a great many more criminals in one swoop." You know, a lot of people here at home don't realize that WE ARE NOW the government of Germany in our zone and that no judicial system can exist other that one WE approve. We ARE the law... " See: A.R. Butz, "The Hoax of the Twentieth Century", p. 21 (1977 ed.)
Rabbi Meir Kahane in his foreword to Menachem Begin's Biography "The Revolt", second edition wrote:
"...It is terribly difficult to ascertain historical truth because history is at the mercy of the writer.
History is in the eyes of the beholder and his vision is all too often obscured by personal motives, political and economic considerations and intellectual bias.
History is in the eyes of the beholder and his vision is all too often obscured by personal motives, political and economic considerations and intellectual bias.
Worse, it is the victor who dictates the facts after a war. The political faction that emerges powerful informs the curious about the events of the struggle.
Those who have the wealth and the power can afford to be fools or knaves. They have the means to bury their mistakes and rewrite history in their own image.
That which history books tell us the way things happened is not always so: Truth must be sought with diligence and with respectful mistrust of the powers who insist that we believe their version....
Again: Truth must be sought with diligence and with RESPECTFUL MISTRUST of the powers who INSIST that we believe their version....
As Albert Einstein famously said: "The foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
__._,_.___
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment