Feb 21, 2011

New York Times lectures Pakistan on nukes - omits Israeli nukes


New York Times lectures Pakistan on nukes - omits Israeli nukes

by Michael Hoffman | Feb. 21, 2011

This column is online with additional research links:

Here is more of the same — the insufferable Talmudic double-standard 
which the NY Times, in its Zionist exceptionalism, regularly undertakes 
when self-righteously lecturing Muslims about their alleged moral 
failings and ethical lapses, in this case, in the realm of nuclear 
weapons. Pay attention, little Muslims, as the Times imparts to you its 
superior morality out of Animal Farm: Pakistani nukes bad, Israeli nukes 

The lead editorial in the New York Times:

 "..experts say, it (Pakistan) has already manufactured enough fuel for 
40 to 100 additional weapons. That means Pakistan...could soon possess 
the world's fifth-largest arsenal, behind the United States, Russia, 
France and China but ahead of Britain and India. Washington and Moscow, 
with thousands of nuclear weapons each, still have the most weapons by 
far, but at least they are making serious reductions."

—"Pakistan's Nuclear Folly," NY Times Editorial, Feb. 20, 2011 (emphasis 

The omission of "Israel" from the list is arrogant and brazen; the 
unwritten undercurrent being that the Judaic possession of nuclear 
weapons exists in such a vastly higher moral dimension of survival and 
security concerns with regard to the welfare of superior Israeli human 
beings, as to be off-limits to editorial consideration, journalistic 
scrutiny or analogies to other nations' WMD. It is an axiom: God's Holy 
People must possess the bomb, while, for unholy Pakistanis to do so in 
anything other than token amounts, is "folly." 

The Times, in finger-pointing at Pakistan's possession of weapons of 
mass destruction, enumerates the world's nuclear powers (Russia, France, 
China, Britain and India), while the unmentionable power in possession 
of those weapons is rendered invisible. This outrageous omission, which 
demonstrates the degree to which Zionist ideologues operate the Times 
under a patina of liberal universalism,  is in keeping with official 
policy of the "State of Israel," which decrees that Israeli nuclear 
possession is disputed, and should neither be confirmed nor denied by 
the media. 

Questions for the New York Times: 

How many nuclear weapons are there in the Israeli arsenal? Have they 
increased in recent years? Are the Israelis determined to gain 
additional nuclear weapons? If so, is this determination any kind of 
"folly" or cause for concern? What are the Israelis doing with the 
advanced, nuclear-powered submarine Germany donated to them? Are the 
Israelis under any obligation to reduce their nuclear stockpile, or is 
the "existential threat" posed by "militant Islam" a sufficient alibi 
for having no limits? How does the New York Times rank the Israeli 
nuclear weapon stockpile: sixth-largest, fourth-largest, third-largest? 
Under what onerous conditions of repression is Mordechai Vanunu — the 
Judaic nuclear technician and convert to Christianity, who was 
imprisoned for 18 years for the "crime" of confirming the existence of 
Israeli nuclear weapons -- living? Why, after all those years in prison, 
does he still face police harassment and restrictions on his freedom of 
expression in "the only democracy in the Middle East"?

I'll bet it is "anti-semitic" to ask these questions. 

We should all just be good scouts and limit ourselves to worrying about 
Pakistani nukes, while awaiting a signal from our high-caste commissars 
in New York to indicate to us when (if ever) it would not be 
"anti-semitic" to ask probing investigative questions about the 
existential threat which the enormous Israeli and American nuclear 
arsenals pose to sovereign Muslim nations, given the Israeli and 
American record of invasion, and mass murder of civilians, in Lebanon, 
Iraq, Afghanistan and Gaza. 


Michael Hoffman's writing and research is funded entirely by donations 
from readers, and the sale of his books, newsletters and broadcasts:


The HOFFMAN WIRE is a public service of Independent History and Research, Box 849, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83816 USA 

24 Hour Revisionist News Bureau:



Michael Santomauro 
@ 917-974-6367 

What sort of TRUTH is it that crushes the freedom to seek the truth?

Recent Activity:

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.

Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.



No comments: